has now been discovered that BBC 24 also reported the Building 7
collapse before it fell. Furthermore, CNN's Aaron Brown reported that
Building 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing" over an hour before it
both reinforce the shocking, newly discovered BBC coverage wherein Jane
Standley reports the collapse early-- with the building still standing
We are witnessing the unraveling of the 9/11 cover-up.
early timing of these reports is now verified twiceover-- the BBC 24
report is time stamped at 21.54-- or 4:54 P.M. Eastern Standard Time [See World Time Zones]
Secondly, CNN's Aaron Brown states the time as "4:15 Eastern Daylight
Time," announcing Building 7 has fallen-- more than one hour before its
both the BBC report with Jane Standley and the CNN report with Aaron
Brown clearly show Building 7 still standing, 'billowing with smoke' as
the collapse is reported-- so premature reporting is confirmed visually
as well .
no longer any doubt they were all reading off the same script. Reports
mirrored testimony of scores of fire fighters, police and emergency
workers who were told to get back from the building in the 2 hours
before Salomon Brothers building (better known as WTC 7) fell at
group that carried out the demolition of Building 7 was in a position
to feed the media and local authorities an official story. We have the
controlled demolition of Building 7 hidden in plain sight-- including
an admission by the building's 99-year lease holder Larry Silverstein .
We are witnessing the unraveling of the 9/11 cover-up.
video and audio clips of emergency workers who were told the Building 7
was to be purposefully brought down are coming out on an hour-by-hour
basis as thousands of 9/11 researchers investigate publicly available
Jones in his car on the afternoon of 9/11 also heard ABC News report
that the government was considering demolishing Building 7. Jones
didn't't realize what he was hearing for several weeks. Now the
evidence is coming out.
CNN'S REPORT IN-FOCUS AARON BROWN QUESTIONS SCRIPT ON-AIR, UNLIKE BBC
is interesting to note that Aaron Brown seems to realize the
incongruity of his reporting as he looks over his shoulder at Building
7-- still standing and emitting massive trails of smoke.
Just after announcing that WTC 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing," he lets onto his confusion, stating:
I—I—You, to be honest, can see these pictures more clearly than I, but
building number 7, one of the buildings in this very large complex of
buildings that is that is the trade center."
Brown, slicker than the BBC reporter, caught the errors in the script
during live coverage and revised his words, saying instead-- as he
looked at the standing structure:
"And now we are told that there's a fire there and that building may collapse as well as you can see. "
BBC 24 REPORT IN-FOCUS Time-Stamped BBC Broadcast Seals Media Foreknowledge of Building 7 Collapse and Use of Scripting
alternate local BBC report-- which included a live time-stamp-- now
positively establishes that BBC reported the collapse of WTC Building 7
at least 25-minutes prior to the actual collapse of the building.
The feed seen above (at top) reports at 21.54 London time that:
is continuing to come in as you can imagine. We're now being told that
another enormous building in New York has collapsed. It is the 47-story
Salomon Brothers building [better known as WTC Building 7] which was
situated very close to the World Trade Center, right there in this
21.54-- 5 hours earlier in New York-- is 4:54 p.m., well before the actual collapse at 5:20 p.m.
This live feed did not show WTC 7 standing during the announcement, as it was showing B-roll of rescue workers on the ground.
words used are very similar to the BBC report with Jane Standley, who
also reported the WTC 7 collapse prematurely-- with the building
visible in the live frame beyond the window. The latter coverage also
included an explanation by the co-anchor that the building was not
attacked, but, rather, was "weakened"-- perfectly in line with the
official story even before the collapse took place.
BBC'S ABSURD RESPONSE IN-FOCUS BBC Claims 9/11 Tapes Lost; CNN Archivist Contradicts This, Citing Multiple Copies Recorded
responded to news of the early report on Building 7's collapse,
claiming, amongst other excuses, that their 9/11 tapes have been lost.
A CNN archivist in Atlanta, and Infowars reader, corrected this erroneous notion:
an archivist with the CNN News Library in Atlanta, and I can tell you
with absolute certainty, the mere idea that news agencies such as ours
would "misplace" any airchecks from 9/11 is preposterous . CNN has
these tapes locked away from all the others. People like myself, who
normally would have access to any tapes in our library, must ask
special permission in order to view airchecks from that day. Multiple
tapes would have been recording their broadcast that day, and there are
also private agencies that record all broadcasts from all channels -
constantly - in the event that a news agency missed something or needs
something . They don't just have one copy... they have several. It's
standard procedure, and as soon as the second plane hit, they would
start recording several copies on other tapes machines all day long.
only information they need to give out is the source of the collapse
claim. No one is saying the BBC is "part of the conspiracy," we're
saying that someone gave that reporter the information ahead of time.
The source of that information is the only thing they can reveal that
would be meaningful."
WTC COMPLEX IN-FOCUS WTC 3 Was Structurally Destroyed by Falling Debris, Yet Did Not Uniformly Collapse at Free-Fall Speed Like WTC 7
World Trade Center Building 3
-- known publicly as the 22-story Marriott Hotel positioned between the
Twin Towers-- was heavily damaged during the collapse of WTC 2, yet it
did not experience uniform collapse either vertically or horizontally--
but rather a crater of inconsistent breakage.
WTC Building 3 Was Heavily Damaged by the Collapse of Tower 2, Yet Did Not Collapse Uniformly.
Building 7, which was comparably far removed from the two buildings hit
by airliners, suffered only minor fires and sudden, uniform collapse--
typically indicative of a controlled demolition.
the difference in damage between the two steel buildings is baffling
and untenable under the explanation offered by the government's
MORE INFORMATION TO COME AS THESE NEW DEVELOPMENTS CONTINUE TO SURFACE THROUGH INDEPENDENT 9/11 RESEARCH.
BBC Responds to Building 7 Controversy; Claim 9/11 Tapes Lost Pathetic
five paragraph blog rebuttal does not answer questions as to source of
report that Salomon Building was coming down, BBC claims tapes lost due
to "cock-up" not conspiracy
BBC has been forced to respond to footage showing their correspondent
reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it fell on 9/11, claiming tapes
from the day are somehow missing, and refusing to identify the source
for their bizarre act of "clairvoyance" in accurately preempting the
fall of Building 7.
Here is the BBC's response to the questions about the footage that was unearthed yesterday, with my comments after each statement.
1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on
September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going
to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of
didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down." If
this is true, then how on earth did the BBC report the collapse of
Building 7 before it happened? Psychic clairvoyance? Of course they
were told that WTC 7 was coming down, just like the firefighters, police, first responders and CNN
were told it was coming down. They had to have had a source for making
such a claim. The BBC is acting like the naughty little boy who got
caught with his hand in the cookie jar. No one here is claiming the BBC
are "part of the conspiracy," but their hideous penchant to just repeat
what authorities tell them without even a cursory investigation (and
with the Building they are telling us has collapsed mockingly filling
the background shot of the report), is a damning indictment of their
yellow journalism when it comes to 9/11.
2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I'm quite sure we said things
which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate - but at the time were
based on the best information we had. We did what we always did -
sourced our reports, used qualifying words like "apparently" or "it's
reported" or "we're hearing" and constantly tried to check and double
check the information we were receiving.
do "chaos and confusion" explain how the BBC reported on the collapse
of a building, a collapse that happened "unexpectedly" according to
their Conspiracy Files hit piece documentary, before it happened? In
one breath the BBC is claiming they were not told of the impending
collapse of the Building and in the next they are telling us that all
their information is sourced. Which is it to be? Did the BBC have a
source telling them the building was about to collapse or not? If not,
how on earth could they pre-empt its fall? Do BBC reporters have access
to a time machine? What was the source of this information?
3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the
attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her
mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember
minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day
she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being
told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were
monitoring feeds and wires services.
to make sense of what she was being told? She obviously didn't make
much sense of the fact that the Building she was reporting had
collapsed was prominently standing behind her! Unfortunately, for a
news organization that prides itself on accuracy and credibility, "she
doesn't remember" just doesn't cut it as an excuse.
BBC included a screenshot of yesterday's Prison Planet article in their brief response.
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv .
Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences,
speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15
cents a day! Click here to subscribe!
4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for
reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording
of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our
sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way
are asked to believe that the world's premiere news organization has
somehow lost all its tapes of perhaps the biggest news event of the
past 60 years. This is a copout. Whether they have lost the tapes or
not, the BBC simply doesn't want to verify one hundred per cent their
monumental foul-up, because they know it would only increase the
exposure of this issue and lead to further questions. What is there to
clear up? The reporter is standing in front of the building while
saying it has already collapsed! This is a blatant effort to try and
placate people making complaints while refusing to admit a monumental
faux pas that further undermines the BBC's credibility in the aftermath
of the Conspiracy Files debacle .
5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it
would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on
You Tube says today "so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what
was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy... "
now the BBC are so devoid of answers, they have to enlist the help of
some moronic comment on a You Tube blog? Instead of issuing official
statements and seeking the advice of legal professionals they produce a
cobbled together five paragraph blog and include the testimony of some
moron on a You Tube comment board. Pathetic! Answer the question BBC -
what was your source for reporting on multiple occasions that Building
7 had collapsed before it had collapsed, and identify the source that
enabled the anchorman to comment that the building had collapsed due to
it being weakened, an explanation still unanswered by NIST five and a
half years later.
If you had
reported the collapse of the twin towers before it happened would that
have been just an error too? This "error" translated as $800 million
plus in insurance bounty for Larry Silverstein - I'm sure Industrial
Risk Insurers would be interested to know the source of your "error."
In addition, two seperate sources reported that Secret Service Agent Craig Miller
died as a result of the collapse of Building 7. Do you think he would
have been interested in the "error" that led to your correspondent
reporting the building's downfall in advance?
"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. " - Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK Get TerrorStorm on DVD today