Did Hitler Really Die In the Bunker or in Argentina?
picture of Richard Koshimizu:
http://harmonicslife.net/Blog/2006/911TruthJapan/DSCN0066.jpg
Richard Koshimizu his page......( http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/meanwhile_j.htm )
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/sitemap.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/aratasensei.htm
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=c3c_1200357242
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/nanasi911/20070701/p1
http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/2007/06/07/japanese-holocaust-denier-forms-political-party/
http://renseradioforum.yuku.com/topic/1741
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1198911172610409375
http://richardkoshimizu.at.webry.info/
http://richardkoshimizu.at.webry.info/200804/article_19.html
http://rickoshimizu.proboards92.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1
'After
WW II, at least five German U-boats reached Argentina with no less than
50 high ranked Third Reich officials on board. During the trip they
sunk a US battle ship and the Brazilian cruiser Bahia with a death toll
of more than 400, including US citizens.
Both the US and the British Government
have systematically covered up the operation. Why? Did they take Hitler
to Patagonia?'
Hitler died in Berlin in 1945? No. He did not. U-boat took
him to Argentina.
Did
Adolf Hitler really commit suicide in bunker in Berlin on the day of
fall of Third Reich? We are told Soviet troops found Hitler's body and
buried somewhere in Berlin. Anyone saw it? Anyone checked its DNA to
specify? Wasn't it a corpse of Hitler's double? (Hitler had a double of
a close resemblance as witnessed by Angel Velasco.)
I understand
Hitler did not die in Berlin and fled to Norway where he took U-boat to
head for South America. According to Pravda of Russia, at least 5
U-boats have arrived at Argentina port with many of Nazi officials on
board. This is the confirmed fact in history.
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/November08/hitler-altersheim.jpg
Did Barron Adolf Rothschild Hitler
flee to Argentina after completing his Zionistic task to construct
Israel, then, live till 1980's there, protected by Jewish community? (By
richardkoshimizu)
.........
Appendix 2
WAS HITLER A ROTHSCHILD? by David Icke
http://www.davidicke.com/icke/articles/hitler.html
Rockefeller
financed "Cousin" Adolf
http://www.reformation.org/rockefeller-investigates-bush.html
Hitler was a Rothschild
"There
are some people who seriously doubt that Johann Georg Hiedler was the
father of Alois. Thyssen and Koehler, for example, claim that
Chancellor Dollfuss had ordered the Austrian police to conduct a
thorough investigation into the Hitler family. As a result of this
investigation a secret document was prepared that proved that Maria
Anna Schicklgruber was living in Vienna at the time she conceived. At
that time she was employed as a servant in the home of Baron
Rothschild. As soon as the family discovered her pregnancy she was sent
back to her home in Spital where Alois was born. If it is true that one
of the Rothschilds is the real father of Alois Hitler, it would make
Adolf a quarter Jew. According to these sources, Adolf Hitler knew of
the existence of this document and the incriminating evidence it
contained. In order to obtain it he precipitated events in Austria and
initiated the assassination of Dollfuss. According to this story, he
failed to obtain the document at that time since Dollfuss had secreted
it and had told Schuschnigg of its whereabouts so that in the event of
his death the independence of Austria would remain assured. Several stories of this general character are in
circulation. (Langer, The Mind of Adolf Hitler, p.107)." This
fact alone explain why the dunce
Hitler should come from
nowhere and become Chancellor of Germany.
Appendix 3
EICHMANN
WAS A JEW, FLUENT AT YIDDISH. NAZI WAS A ZIONIST'S ORGAN TO CHASE JEWS
OUT OF EUROPE TO ISRAEL.
June 11, 2001 NA (Network America)
More on the McVeigh / Oklahoma Cover-up
http://www.votefraud.org/News/2001/6/061101.html
Eichmann
spoke Yiddish, visited Palestine numerous times during the 1930s,
called himself a Zionist according to several participants in that era,
and was instrumental in setting up training camps in various parts of
Europe for the Israeli commandos and “freedom fighters” who would be
used in the brutal invasion and takeover of Palestine in 1948. Hennecke
Kardel, author of “Adolph Hitler: Founder of Modern Israel”, himself
said to be an Austrian Jew by at least some authors, insists that
Eichmann was himself Jewish.
Appendix 4
BECAUSE OF
HITLER, BIBICAL PROPHECY IN AMOS WAS FULFILLED. WITHOUT HITLER, NATION
OF ISRAEL NEVER EXISTS.
.......
From
Dust Jacket Piece (May 2004)
Dr.
Robert Faurisson has concluded from his research that the alleged
Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one
and the same historical lie, which has made possible a gigantic
political-financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of
Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German
people - but not their leaders - and the Palestinian people in their
entirety.
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/hitlerinargentine.htm
also:
NEW AND EXTREMELY
IMPORTANT!
DEAR 9-11 RESPONDERS, YOU ARE DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER AFTER WORKING AT
GROUND ZERO.
DO
YOU KNOW THE REAL REASON OF YOUR DISEASE? 9-11 PERPETRATORS DID USE
SMALL HYDROGEN BOMBS TO DEMOLISH WTC. YOU WERE EXPOSED TO NEUTRON RAY
THAT CAUSED YOUR CANCER.
DEAR PATIENTS OF WTC SYNDROME, YOUR
RESPIRATORY PROBLEM IS DUE TO RADIOISOTOPE OF TRITIUM CREATED BY
HYDROGEN BOMB. YOU INHALED IT WITH DUST WHICH KEEPS ON IRRADIATING BETA
RAY INSIDE YOUR RESPIRATORY ORGANS. YOU TOO MAY BE DIAGNOSED WITH
CANCER IN FUTURE. MUST TAKE PRECAUTION. ..........
ADL/SWC ARE TRYING TO
AVOID THE
WORLD TO KNOW THE USAGE OF HYDROGEN BOMBS AT WTC BY JEWISH MEGA POWER.
THUS THEY NEED TO LABEL RICHARD KOSHIMIZU ANTI-SEMITIC, HOPING THE
WORLD NOT TO LISTEN TO HIM. AND MANY OF AMERICANS ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO
DO SO. ////
At WTC Tritium's
level was 8
times higher than normal a few days after 911. Tritium cannot become
such high unless the hydrogen bomb is detonated. Though Jewish 911
perpetrators have tried to dilute the Tritium by means of discharging
huge volume of water, they could not erase the evidence.
1600 bodies of WTC victims
have
totally disappeared. The chief coroner said the bodies were evaporated.
If hydrogen bomb is detonated at the bottom of WTC1, 2 and 7, those who
were above the ground level in the buildings would have been perfectly
vaporised.
How the WTC dust could
have been
produced? Only the way to explain it is the moisture vapor explosion
inside the concrete caused by the extremely high heat of hydrogen bomb.
///
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/atamawaruineyudayajin.htm
.......
1- - .....A malicious
distortion.
What I said is that no Jew was killed in Auschwitz's gas chamber. Gas
chamber itself was fabricated post war by Jew occupied Soviet Union.
But, Holocaust did exist. 60,000 including 30,000 Jews such as Anne
Frank died of camp fever in Auschwitz as Nazi could not provide
sufficient Zyklon B to sterilize the camps. Anyhow it should be
regarded as Holocaust though 6 million death is a mere myth, thus,
Holocaust did exist. However, one should realize that this Holocaust
was in fact performed by Stealth Jews. Zionist Jews needed to
wipe out
Anti-Zionism Jews, thus, selectively sent Non-Zionist Jews into the
camps. A covert Jewish organization's top official also admits it in
his threatening e. mail to Richard Koshimizu. Holocaust was done by
Zionist Jews to chase European Jews into Israel, thus, Israel was
established after the war. Adolf Hitler is the father of Israel.
(meanwhile, we are not establishing any political party, therefore,
Jewish Liars are totally wrong in saying that "Holocaust denier
establishes party in Japan".
THREATENING MESSAGES FROM
JEWISH
PERPETRATORS WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 911 FAKE TERROR AND INVASION TO
AFGHAN/IRAQ AND SOME FROM USELESS MORONS, TOO.
2. Adolf Hitler was the
grandson of Solomon Meyer Rothschild
Richard Koshimizu is not
only the person to claim this. If one do not agree, read this and think
well.
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/yudayasensou.e.htm#hitler
Hitler was the direct
descendant
of Rothschild, thus, he was given power and fund. His task was to
establish the State of Israel and he managed it.
3. The Nazi dictator's rise to power was funded by Rothschild and other
Jewish corporations.
This is absolutely true.
Many
other than Richard Koshimizu share the same conclusion. Nothing new and
is a common sense in Japanese historical study. Nazi was a covert
faction of Zionist. ...
An Argentina
professor has
recently reported to me that Hitler could have stayed in the town of
Miramar near Cordova at a German Hotel and later spent a few years at
the hidden property of Mr. Jorge Antonio who was the employer of
Eichmann. .......
6. Jews were behind
the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Yes,
correct. WW2 itself was fabricated by Stealth Jews such as Roosevelt,
Eisenhower, Churchill and Stalin. And Hiroshima bombing was decided by
Roosevelt and another stealth Jew, Truman. Atomic bombs were invented
by Jewish such as Einstein and Oppenheimer. B29 who brought the bomb to
Hiroshima was packed with Jewish crews. Hiroshima bombing should be
regarded as a real Holocaust performed by Jewish.
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/jewish_intimidation.htm
http://www15.ocn.ne.jp/~oyakodon/newversion/atamawaruineyudayajin.htm
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5740
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3408801,00.html
http://www.israelforum.com/board/showthread.php?t=12672
(...)
Most viewed videos on Google in
Japan, July 2008: The Global Warming Swindle/Richard Koshimizu
Fukuoka Conference / Loose Change /Abe Yoshihiro lecture -
Part 1/ Abe Yoshihiro lecture - Part 5
Not all Japanese are dupes. A certain
amount of younger Japanese are waking up. In June 2007, the Zionist Y-Net
lamented that a young Japanese
named Richard Koshimizu set up a political group named the
"Independence Party.” Y-Net claims that Koshimizu said the
holocaust is a hoax, and that Jews funded Hitler.
Zionists responded that they
would “handle” Mr. Koshimizu “quietly.”
..........................................
.... . Leuren Moret,
the well known and internationally famous expert lecturer on the health
effects of depleted uranium (DU), presented testimony on the high
levels of radiation recorded in the area around the Pentagon in the
hours and days after the destruction that took place there, suggesting
that a cruise missile was the cause of the damage and NOT a passenger
plane as we have been told, as cruise missiles contain DU.
Mad
Amano,
a well known parody cartoonist spoke on how the mass media is using
movies like ‘Flight 93’ and ‘The World Trade Center’ to embed the
untruth of the events of September 11th, 2001 into the psyche of the
world...
Richard Koshimizu
gave a very annimated and powerful presentation covering many aspects
of the Sept. 11th government conspiracy.
............................................................................................
............................................................................................
Wednesday,
19 November 2008 |
Mass
Manipulation of Gold and Silver Prices Exposed
'Commodities
experts are in agreement that the price of gold and silver is being
manipulated by bankers and government officials in order to halt a mass
abandonment of paper currencies and the debt based economy.' The New
York Post today carries a column by John Crudele declaring that there
is a global run on gold coins and that
demand is not being met by government mints.....
“There’s another more puzzling
aspect to the recent
gold rush.” Crudele writes, referring to the fact that the market price
of gold is declining, despite the increase in demand.
Crudele quotes Bill
Murphy, chairman of the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee who states:
“Gold should be
moving up… How could
there be such a dichotomy between the historic high premium for coins
all over the world and the low Comex price?”...(...)
Murphy
and the GATA
has been attempting to expose the blatant manipulation for a number of
years now. “The gold market is managed by certain central banks and
their agents, the bullion banks” he wrote in 2005. “It is a
price-fixing case involving some very powerful people and institutions
… in fact it is a Gold Cartel.”
Murphy
and others
have revealed how the IMF and the central banks have sought to suppress
the gold price over the last 10 years in order to maintain their
monopoly over an economy based on debt and fiat paper currencies.
We
have previously reported on how the
official COMEX gold future numbers are completely divorced from reality
and banker manipulation is rife.
Recently,
influential private investment advisor Martin Hennecke echoed these sentiments
declaring that the anomalous price trends were partly a result of
temporary deleveraging as well as, “manipulation as the central bankers
and the politicians don’t want you to panic out of their debt and go
into gold.”
Hennecke
and other
investors such as Jim Rogers have predicted that gold prices will
explode towards $2,000 an ounce with future hyperinflation resulting
from the global central banks’ insistence on printing their way out of
economic turmoil.
|
.........................................................................
Wednesday,
19 November 2008 |
Kidnapped by the Israeli Navy
'Fifteen
Palestinian fishermen along with three internationals have been
kidnapped in Palestinian waters by the Israeli Navy. They were fishing
seven miles off the coast of Deir Al Balah, clearly in Gaza fishing
waters and well within the fishing limit detailed in the Oslo Accords
of 1994. The fishermen and the human right's observers were transferred
from 3 separate boats to the Israeli warships. Other Palestinian
fishermen reported that the 3 boats were seen being taken north by the
Israeli Navy.'
|
|
WHISTLEBLOWER'S
RESPONSE TO CASPER UPDATE OF NOV. 18, 2008
AND
.....
WE THE
PEOPLE CAN BY-PASS EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY and force them to answer;
why are you working for the banks not us?
why are you violating the Constitution every day?
why are you selling out our grandchildren's future?
why
can't I get so & so on the phone?
why
are all the lines busy?
why
was Cheney indicted?
why do you work for these criminals?
why
has every dept and agency of the government been incorporated?
why are you holding so many Americans as political prisoners?
how's
the weather?
what time is it?
Well what do
you say gang? Deliver by Friday ...OR..... WE go dialing for answers?
The task is
simple, lets prepare to begin Monday.
Should you
be asked "why are
you doing this"? The answer is "we are sick and tired of Washington's
corruption and we are responding to the televised call for action from
The National Taxpayers Union".
ATTENTION:
FOURWINDS READERS! FROM CASPER:DIALING FOR ANSWERS! next monday (( casper nov
19th no.1 ))
AND
U.S.
CONGRESS PHONE NUMBERS / PRES. BUSH / PRES. ELECT OBAMA
=============================================
Posted Nov. 18,
2008
This video
contains images depicting the reality and horror of war and should only
be viewed by a mature audience.
Ilan Pappe
1 hr 27 min 59
sec - Jul 12, 2007
Israeli
historian Ilan Pappe describes the period around the declaration of
Israel’s independence as one during which the indigenous Palestinian
population was ethnically cleansed from the land when they were forced
from their homes or fled in terror after hearing news of rapes and
massacres at other villages. Today, the situation is not much better
for the Palestinians under Israeli rule. “To make things so difficult
for the Palestinians so that anyone who wants a normal life will leave.”
TO VIEW THIS VIDEO CLICK ON:
...........................................
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Wednesday,
19 November 2008 |
Soros Think Tank Pulling Obama's Strings
'Thanks in part
to funding from benefactors such as billionaire George Soros,
the Center For American Progress has become in just five years an
intellectual wellspring for Democratic policy proposals, including many
that are shaping the agenda of the new Obama administration.'
.............................................................
Wednesday, 19 November 2008 |
BARACK OBAMA …
… THE NAKED
EMPEROR
The David
Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday With A 5,000-Word Special On The
Obama Myth
Obama’s
predominant mantra is ‘change’. Indeed, his massively-funded,
record-breaking campaign has been based on that one word – change.
This is a technique used by Bill Clinton and many others and it is
highly effective because, at any point, the system ensures that most
people are not happy with the way life is. So, when you don’t like the
status quo, ‘change’ can be a potent message, even if, like Obama, you
don’t say what it means.
It
has been vital to his success, and that of his controllers, that he has
never specified what his ‘hope’, ‘change’, and that other mind-control
trigger-word, ‘believe’, were referring to in terms of policy and the
way society in general will be affected. Hope for what?
Change what? Believe in what?
To answer those questions with specifics would have been fatal to
Obama’s appeal.
I
studied the military/government mind-control programmes and techniques
in great detail for many years during the late-1990s and across 2000,
and the Obama ‘phenomenon’ is the most blatant mass-mind control
operation you could wish to see.
At its core the plan has been
to make Obama the focus of everything you hope for, believe in and want
to change. This is why it has been crucial for him not to specify and
detail what is meant by his ‘hope, ‘change’ and ‘believe’.
However, I can tell you what those words mean in the context of the
Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide they mean or
want them to mean. The idea is for you to project all that
you stand for onto him and so he becomes the symbol of you and how you
see the world.
Specifics
would destroy that ‘I am whatever you want me to be’ scenario and so
you don’t get any detail, just ‘hope’, ‘change’, and ‘believe’.
‘I am whatever you want me
to be, for I am just a projection of you. And I got a big smile, see.’
............................................................
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SOTT:
Simon Davies & Donald Hunt
SOTT.net Mon, 17 Nov 2008
Extract from a letter written by
Rothschild Bros of London to a New York firm of bankers on 25 June 1863
"The
few who can understand the System (Cheque Money and Credits) will
either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on its favours,
that there will be no opposition from that class. While on the other
hand, the great body of people mentally incapable of comprehending the
tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear
its burdens without complaint and perhaps without even suspecting that
the system is inimical*
to their interests." -
* (hostile, hurtful)
Retail sales dropped
2.8% in the U.S. in October (compared to October of 2007), the worst
monthly drop on record. That sent stocks tumbling again, with the Dow
falling 5% for the week. Since the whole global economy depends on U.S.
consumer spending, the other major national stock exchanges also fell
for the week.
The U.K. seems to be entering the "capital flight"
stage that used to happen only to developing nations. The pound dropped
6% against the dollar last week.
With the world economy
officially in what economists call "crash and burn" mode (no, we made
that up, they actually euphemistically call it a "serious recession"),
governments, finance ministers, and central bankers are scrambling for
more actions to take. Trillions of dollars have been pumped in to the
financial system, interest rates have been lowered to almost zero, and
checks have been mailed to U.S. citizens (and already spent).
The
only thing left to do is invest in infrastructure improvements and
reinvigorate heavy industry. In the United States, the auto industry is
in dire need of a bailout, but they are an easy industry to hate, so
politically, there is some selling to do. The Democrats in Congress are
pushing for
an auto industry bailout but Bush is trying to sneak a free-trade
agreement with the narco-terrorist regime of Colombia into the bill -
nothing like a last favour for your friends.(...)
The situation is eerily
similar to the 1932-33
transition, when banks were failing before Franklin Roosevelt was
inaugurated. Herbert Hoover disagreed strongly with Roosevelt's
approach, but wanted Roosevelt to cooperate in joint action. Roosevelt
refused, not wanting to be tied to Hoover's policies and also feeling
that the worse things got the more power he would have to act once
inaugurated.
But what will Obama's policies be? The conventional way to get an idea
is to look at his advisors . As a
commentor on Postman Patel's
blog wrote,
What happens when
you replace a sociopathic
lunatic with an eloquent, sane man who espouses the exact same
policies? I think it will become even more apparent to the world that
America is helplessly in the grip of corrupt corporations and a
hopelessly corrupt Congress...
While Jonathan Weil calls
it as it is; in relation to Obama's advisors he says, "It's hard to believe that Barack Obama would even
think of calling this change."
It
may be, however, that events may push things far beyond the control of
the putative leaders. As things get worse, public anger may push more
radical solutions that would normally be considered (the 1930s again
offer a parallel).
Here is
a warning to U.S. corporate leaders from Shoshana Zuboff, a Harvard
Business School professor. Zubhoff identifies the almost total lack of
trust in business that holds sway across the US (and the UK and Europe
if she did but know it) as having its roots in the time when businesses
ceased to have any humanity and became solely money making machines;
the process of ponerization pushed through by free-market economics
that we discussed last week. The
problem is that she makes the process seem way more accidental than it
is. Naomi Klein in Shock Doctrine argues that the process was
deliberate and well thought-out.(...)
Solutions are sought when
there are problems so we
would be safe to assume that there is a problem, wouldn't we? So what
is the problem for which a solution is sought? Perhaps some of the G20
leaders see the problem encapsulating a lack of liquidity in the
banking system which has led to banks refusing to make new loans or
refresh old loans to businesses, but that one has already been
addressed; there is now unlimited central bank liquidity
available..........
With their financial
paymasters always at hand they
might also see part of the problem as excess debt for individuals,
businesses, regions and nations which they are now unable to refinance
or indeed even pay all the interest. Maybe it's extreme volatility in
the financial markets - some politicians will see the loss in value to
peoples savings due to stock market collapse, others will see the drop
in commodity prices causing losses of real revenue, others see food
prices rocketing beyond the reach of ordinary people or recession in
manufacturing causing loss of jobs. Certainly for the ordinary people
the latter are very real problems for which solutions are desperately
needed.
However, these are not problems for the
puppet masters of the world economic system; they are not facing
disaster, ruin or starvation. They are sitting pretty pulling the
levers of the global economy and thereby directing the show
exactly as planned.
What we have in fact for the puppet
masters is a solution, a global central bank, looking for a problem.
Does
it have to be this way?
Last week we said that there are alternatives, summarizing the ideas of
Herman Daly among which was, "Abolish fractional reserve
banking. Give the control of money back to governments and away from
banks".
Two very simple statements but ones that certainly won't be on the
agenda in Washington this weekend, for these two simple ideas go to the
root of the issue and to the root of global power.
We are all
agreed that the current banking bailout is larceny on a grand scale but
does everybody know quite how unbelievable we have all been screwed all
of our lives?
We were all born into this system, it didn't come
upon us; we have nothing to compare it to. For the most part we are
unaware that there might be alternatives and if so what those
alternative might look like. We take certain attributes of the system
to be fixed, immutable, but are they? ....
We are all slaves so why
are we so afraid of the
alternatives to our slavery that we are not actively seeking new ways
of doing things.
The basic answer seems to us that we are afraid
of the unknown, we are simply afraid of the dark; which isn't very
impressive when you think about it, is it?
Fear originates in the most primitive and
deepest part of our brain. This should give us pause for thought about
the nature of the beings - psychopaths - that control us and keep that
fear always there, always pressing in upon us, always stalking us. They
have been playing our fear for all it's worth for generation after
generation. Back when religion truly was the opium of the masses, when
widespread ignorance and superstition and limited travel and
communication were the standard, it is understandable that human's
seemingly innate fears were used against them. But in today's world of
high speed internet, lightning fast communication, and global travel we
would have thought that the ignorance would have been dispelled and
along with it the fear. But that is not the case.
(...) It simply doesn't have to be this
way. Money does not need to be borrowed by government from privately
controlled central banks, interest does not need to be charged and
banks do not need to be run as they are. The 'laws' that
govern the economic system are not natural 'laws', they are mechanical
laws and can change if we change the mechanism. (...)
Our
Money system
Imagine
a community based on agriculture. There are farmers, laborers,
merchants, storehouse owners and the various people who supply goods
and services to the community built around these people. The farmers
need seed to plant in spring so they borrow it from the merchants who
have some stored from the previous year. It is planted and grows.
Harvest arrives, the farmers hire laborers, the crop is gathered in and
a large volume of seeds are sent by the farmers to the storehouses. The
laborers are all paid in seeds, the merchants are repaid their seed
plus some extra ('interest') and the storehouse fees are paid in seed.
The remaining seed is then available for purchase as food for the
community. For each crop there is a value agreed in terms of the other
crops and services that all the community needs, the seeds being
physically exchanged in each transaction.
Many societies have
existed that used just such a system. Many soon developed the idea that
rather than exchange the physical seeds for every transaction, a token
that represented a certain amount of seeds (in the storehouse) could be
used. So the storehouse owners issued the tokens and the people used
them to effect day to day transactions. Eventually somebody in the
chain would want some seeds to either eat or plant and would go to the
storehouse to exchange the token for the seeds; a simple and effective
system.
Money
in the such forms is referred to as "Representative Money". The token
could be presented to the issuer at any time and 'demand' for the
underlying commodity made. The system relied upon the issuer being able
to deliver the specified commodity upon such 'demand'. (...)
The problems began when the
principles of repaying
loans with "interest" of the same material as the loan, seeds or
animals, was transferred to non-reproductive commodities such as
metals; for while seeds and animals can reproduce and yield a greater
amount than at commencement of a loan, metals cannot. So loans in
metal, with interest and principal payable in metal, are inherently
flawed as they require the conversion of things that can reproduce into
metals.
This then leaves the borrower at the mercy of the
fluctuating value of the thing they produce. A value that can be easily
manipulated by increasing or decreasing the supply of money.
We were discussing this at
the kitchen table the
other day. Imagine you are at the table with a friend, you each have a
coffee mug, these are the only two tradeable items in your economic
system. Your system has $1 in it. By definition therefore, each mug
must be worth 50 cents - the mugs being the only things that can be
exchanged in your system and money, the $1, being the only medium of
exchange. Now let us imagine that another $1 is introduced into the
system, nothing else has changed other than this addition yet the worth
of each mug has increased to $1 (2 mugs/$2 = $1). For every dollar
introduced into the system the value of each mug will increase by 50
cents. Inflation, the rise in price or value of things within the
system, is directly linked to the supply of money - this is the Quantity Theory of Money.
Let's
look next at how the dollars got into your simple 2 mug $2 economic
system. There are just the two of you so you have 2 choices; you can
take 2 pieces of paper, write "$1" on each and agree that you will both
respect that piece of paper as being a dollar or one of you could do
the writing and give one dollar to the other, it really doesn't matter
because the dollars are being given. They have no value in themselves,
they just represent value by agreement. Now imagine that 8 friends come
round and you need 8 more mugs. One of your friends makes mugs so
agrees to make 8 more for $1 each; but you only have $2 in your system.
So you agree among you that you will get 8 more pieces of paper, write
"$1" on each, and give them to the mug maker with the assurance that
you will all accept the paper as being a dollar. Now you have 10 mugs
and $10 in the system. Should you wish to sell your mug you know it is
worth $1 and you will accept a piece of paper with "$1" written on it
in exchange for it. The supply of money grows along with the supply of
goods. As long as there are new goods in the system matching the
increase in the supply of money then the price or value of each item
(in our case, mugs) remains the same.
If however more money is added to the system than goods then the price
or value of those goods goes up, there is inflation. Conversely, if the
supply of money is reduced then the price or value of the mugs goes
down. This is one of the games that bankers play; they increase and
then decrease the supply of money in the system. (...)
Under the fractional
reserve banking system, banks
can lend ten times the amount of cash or its equivalent that they have
available, their reserves. This means that if you go into your bank
today with $100 dollars which you put into your account your bank can
immediately legally lend $1,000. It does this by crediting a borrower's
account with $1,000. The borrower takes their cheque (check in the US)
book and, Hey Presto another increase in the money supply goes off to
shop; or if you prefer, the bank by creating credit has added
to the money supply. It is as simple as that. If you are
interested in the numbers a good summary is here. (...)
Forgive the rather long
tangent but we wanted to
illustrate just how easy it was for the banks to increase the money
supply and direct a large part of that increase towards housing.
Hopefully this will have dispelled any doubts you had as to the
manipulated nature of the situation.
The effects of the
manipulation go back to the Quantity Theory of Money. There was an
increase in the general money supply within which was an even greater
increase in the money supply going towards housing. As a result the
cost of goods generally rose and the cost of housing rose even more.
Debt Slavery
The
trap has now been sprung, the massive rise in the cost of housing has
left millions with debts that they have almost no hope of ever paying
off while the homes they bought are now worth a fraction of what they
were. This is the asset price deflation side of the Quantity Theory of
Money; there is now less money available in the housing system so the
value of housing is falling. (...)
The Bush administration
even made it harder to seek protection in bankruptcy in the Bankruptcy
Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005; yet
another piece of remarkably prescient legislation.
When signing this new law Bush commented, "The act of Congress I sign
today will protect those who legitimately need help, stop those who try
to commit fraud and bring greater stability and fairness to our
financial system,".
How Machiavellian can you get? Debt Slavery has been achieved and Bush
calls it fair!
The
Power of Compound Interest
Interest is evil because it enslaves
people.
It also enslaves entire nations for the power of compounded interest is
extraordinary and usually not appreciated, especially by borrowers. ....
Interest is not a
necessity, the entire Islamic
banking system is proof of that. The absence of interest does not mean
that a lender should not have a return for the use of their money;
rather that return should be linked directly to the use. If a business
does well then it is reasonable to share the benefits with the lender
of the money that facilitated that success in part. Similarly, if a
business does badly or a crop fails then the lender should share in
that risk.
The destitution and suicides amongst Indian farmers
would not be happening if the lenders were at risk for the success of
the crop. If they were at risk then they would not be so keen to force
the farmers to use genetically modified crops which are designed to
fail. Aligning the interests of the borrower and lender would
change many of the world's most dreadful practices.
National
Debt
There need be no national
debt.
That's a radical statement but it's also true. So why is it that all
our nations labor under such large debt burdens? The answer was
provided by Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744 - 1812), "Permit me to issue and control the money of the
nation and I care not who makes its laws."
The
Bank of England was established in 1694 as a private bank in exchange
for an initial loan to the government of William III (William of
Orange) of ₤1,200,000. Needless to say, the events surrounding the
granting of the Royal Charter do not speak of straight dealing.
Similarly, the events surrounding the establishment of the Federal
Reserve have a highly conspiratorial nature to them. Not surprising
when the entire venture is in breach of the Constitution and against
the interests of the American people. (...)
The
Money Power
It
is worthy of note that James Garfield, Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy
all held views that opposed the interests of bankers and that all three
men were assassinated while President of the US.(...)
All these men either
opposed or spoke up against
the Money Power, a term coined by L.B. Woolfolk in his book The Great
Red Dragon. Woolfolk laid the entire blame upon the people amongst
whose number were found the bankers who held the Money Power. It is
very tempting to lay the blame for all financial matters today at the
feet of that same group of people but it is not truthful to do so. The
blame lies with the psychopaths and sociopaths. That the most
successful of these psychopaths in the financial sphere come in large
proportion from one group of people is primarily a matter for that
group; for, in hiding under the skirts of Judaism, the evils of the
Money Power, Zionism and Bolshevism have harmed Jews as much if not
more than non-Jews. The issue for all of us is psychopathy and its
pathology. How to identify it, isolate it and neutralize it is a matter
for all normal people and not one of race, creed or colour.
The modern preeminence
of Jews in the money business
may have its roots in the ban imposed upon Christians until the early
16th century on usury and the extant ban on the same practice for all
Muslims. In the western world that pretty much just left the Jews. It
wouldn't have mattered who was left with such a monopoly for it
is in the very nature of modern money that it provides a means to
predate upon people like no other instrument in history.
It's very structure is the product of an evil genius for it is so
incredibly simple yet incredibly powerful and plays on man's weaknesses
of greed, avarice and jealousy.
Three steps have to be taken to break the Money Power:-
...The Federal Reserve, and
all similar central
banks that are not owned by the nation, should be taken into public
ownership and become part of the national treasury. The power to issue
money must vest in the national treasury only.
...Abolish fractional reserve banking.
...The
government of the US should stop the bailout theft and instead direct
new money, created not through debt but using the power vested in
Congress by the Constitution, towards rebuilding America's crumbling
physical and social infrastructure. (...)
Jim Rogers addressed this issue in a CNBC
interview in October when he decried the inevitable inflationary effect
of the governments of the world bailing out the banks. The effect is
inevitably inflationary because pumping money into banks, money that
isn't reaching the real economy, will not produce one iota of
additional goods in the economy. Even if some of that money if forced
into the real economy, coming via banks as debt with the inevitable
interest burden, it will be detrimental to the overall health of the
system. In fact it can only harm the economy in the current system
through both the inflationary effect and the expansion in government
debt.
The same money spent in the real
economy would
produce an increase in real goods, benefiting ordinary people through
job creation, while being broadly non-inflationary if not created as
government debt.
Once again, when
they tell you they have to save the banks THIS way - they are lying.
When they tell you there is no alternative way to run the economy, to
issue money and to run banks - that it just has to be THIS way - they are lying.
Sure, the majority
of mid-level contributors
to this mess were daft fools driven by greed and fear; with no
comprehension of where they were headed. But to believe that only
Nassim Taleb [who developed the Black Swan
concept, "large-impact, hard-to-predict, random, unplanned and rare
events beyond the realm of normal expectations."], and some net based
Loons, were the only people who could see a crash coming is nonsense -
and more than a little arrogant
It's also worth remembering that, at
the same time the seeds for the current crash were being sown, the key
components of a fully-blown surveillance and detention state were being
rushed into place in the same countries that were inflating the
bubble.
It's also worth asking yourself just how much, or little, wealth the
people responsible for inflating the bubble have lost personally
........(Something
which dawned on me whilst pondering the Conspiraloon vs the Non
Conspiraloon mental models for comprehending how the world of high
finance works is that the Loon looks upon the financial
markets as being a means of waging war on ordinary people....)
...
Once the savers have
been screwed over good and proper, that's everyone in the bottom 99.99%
of society accounted for, then
all the money our governments have released to the shadow banking
system can be unleashed to buy everything that's worth buying unopposed.
A massive transfer of real wealth will then take place and a glittering future of supercharged debt-serfdom secured.
...............................
best-of-web:
Jonathan
Cook The National
The latest tightening
of Israel's chokehold on Gaza - ending all supplies into the Strip for
more than a week - has produced immediate and shocking consequences for
Gaza's 1.5 million inhabitants.
The refusal to allow in fuel
has forced the shutting down of Gaza's only power station, creating a
blackout that pushed Palestinians bearing candles on to the streets in
protest last week. A water and sanitation crisis are expected to
follow.
And on Thursday, the United Nations
announced it had run out of the food essentials it supplies to 750,000
desperately needy Gazans. "This has become a blockade against
the United Nations itself," a spokesman said.
In a further blow, Israel's large Bank Hapoalim said it would refuse
all transactions with Gaza by the end of the month, effectively
imposing a financial blockade on an economy dependent on the Israeli
shekel. Other banks are planning to follow suit, forced into a corner
by Israel's declaration in Sept 2007 of Gaza as an "enemy entity".
There are likely to be few witnesses to Gaza's descent into a dark and
hungry winter. In the past week, all journalists were refused access to
Gaza, as were a group of senior European diplomats. Days earlier,
dozens of academics and doctors due to attend a conference to assess
the damage done to Gazans' mental health were also turned back.
Israel has blamed the latest restrictions of aid and fuel to Gaza on
Hamas's violation of a five-month ceasefire by launching rockets out of
the Strip. But Israel had a hand in shattering
the agreement: as the world was distracted by the US presidential
elections, the army invaded Gaza, killing six Palestinians and
provoking the rocket fire.
The humanitarian catastrophe
gripping Gaza is largely unrelated to the latest tit-for-tat strikes
between Hamas and Israel. Nearly a year ago, Karen Koning AbuZayd,
commissioner-general of the UN's refugee agency, warned: "Gaza is on
the threshold of becoming the first territory to be intentionally
reduced to a state of abject destitution".
She blamed Gaza's strangulation directly on Israel, but also cited the
international community
as accomplice.(...)
With embarrassing timing,
the Israeli media
revealed at the weekend that one of the first acts of Ismail Haniyeh,
the Hamas prime minister elected in 2006, was to send a message to the
Bush White House offering a long-term truce in return for an end to
Israeli occupation. His offer was not even acknowledged.
Instead, according to the daily Jerusalem Post,
Israeli policymakers have sought to reinforce the impression that "it
would be pointless for Israel to topple Hamas because the population
[of Gaza] is Hamas". On this thinking, collective punishment is
warranted because there are no true civilians in Gaza. Israel is at war
with every single man, woman and child.
In an indication of how
widely this view is shared, the cabinet discussed last week a new
strategy to obliterate Gazan villages in an attempt to stop the rocket
launches, in an echo of discredited Israeli tactics used in south
Lebanon in its war of 2006. The inhabitants would be given warning
before indiscriminate shelling began.
In fact, Israel's desire to seal off Gaza and terrorise its civilian
population predates even Hamas's election victory. It can be dated to
Ariel Sharon's disengagement of summer 2005, when Fatah's rule of the
PA was unchallenged. (..)
With embarrassing timing,
the Israeli media
revealed at the weekend that one of the first acts of Ismail Haniyeh,
the Hamas prime minister elected in 2006, was to send a message to the
Bush White House offering a long-term truce in return for an end to
Israeli occupation. His offer was not even acknowledged.
Instead, according to the daily Jerusalem Post,
Israeli policymakers have sought to reinforce the impression that "it
would be pointless for Israel to topple Hamas because the population
[of Gaza] is Hamas". On this thinking, collective punishment is
warranted because there are no true civilians in Gaza. Israel is at war
with every single man, woman and child.
In an indication of how
widely this view is shared, the cabinet discussed last week a new
strategy to obliterate Gazan villages in an attempt to stop the rocket
launches, in an echo of discredited Israeli tactics used in south
Lebanon in its war of 2006. The inhabitants would be given warning
before indiscriminate shelling began.
In
fact, Israel's desire to seal off Gaza and terrorise its civilian
population predates even Hamas's election victory. It can be dated to
Ariel Sharon's disengagement of summer 2005, when Fatah's rule of the
PA was unchallenged. (...)
The military bombed Gaza's
electricity plant in
June 2006, and has been incrementally cutting fuel supplies ever since.
In January, Mr Vilnai argued that Israel should cut off "all
responsibility" for Gaza and two months later Israel signed a deal with
Egypt for it to build a power station for Gaza in Sinai.
All
of these moves are designed with the same purpose in mind: persuading
the world that Israel's occupation of Gaza is over and that Israel can
therefore ignore the laws of occupation and use unremitting force
against Gaza. ....(...)
Jonathan
Cook is a writer
and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His new book is "Disappearing
Palestine: Israel's Experiments in Human Despair" (Zed Books). His
website is www.jkcook.net.
This article originally appeared in The National, published in Abu
Dhabi.
Comment: Do
you remember that a few years ago Israeli settlers were pulled out of
Gaza? Remember how their (relative) suffering at the loss of their
farms and houses was largely covered by the world media?
It was all part of a strategy of preparation for war.
Israeli Deputy
Defense Minister, Matan Vilnai, stated on Friday
that a large-scale invasion of Gaza is only a matter of time and added
that the army was prepared to invade the Gaza Strip and fight Hamas.
As
Jonathan Cook writes, the purpose was to persuade the world that the
occupation of Gaza was over - and now a logic of unremitting force
applies. Indeed, they couldn't completely destroy the people of a land
they partly occupied. But now they can.
Where is the world media
now that the real suffering of Gaza is reaching its climax?
..............................
Amira
Hass Information Clearinghouse
Let's
not be dragged into calculating how many tons of rice, flour and
cooking oil there are in the Gaza Strip 10 days after Israel once again
hermetically sealed all the crossings into the enclave. Let's not count
the number of children who wait for a nutritious meal at UN Relief and
Works Agency schools, and the number of families to whose doorstep
Hamas delivers boxes filled with grocery staples. (There are those who
swear that these groceries are only given to Hamas members and
supporters.) Let's not calculate the number of people dependent on
their families for sustenance. There is food in the Gaza Strip, and
there will continue to be. Does anyone really think that Israel, the
state of the Jews, would allow 1.5 million people to be tossed, crowded
and crammed, behind the barbed-wire fences and watchtowers surrounding
the narrow strip and starve to death?
Let's leave aside the
stories of darkness, of how
children do (or don't do) their homework by the light of a candle or
kerosene lantern. Let's even put off the discussion on the serious
environmental hazards - pollution of the groundwater and sea - posed to
the people of Gaza and Ashkelon alike as a direct consequence of the
intentional fuel shortage, or of Israel's refusal to permit the entry
of pipes to upgrade the water and sewage infrastructure. Let's not go
now into descriptions of how the sewage flows directly into the sea
because there's not enough electricity to operate the sewage treatment
plant.
Let's not talk about fears that sewers will back up
in the winter and flood residential neighborhoods
because parts needed to fix the treatment plant were not brought in.
Let's
not get dragged into that number crunching, into reducing the
Palestinians' lives to a near-animal level, to a humanitarian problem
that is easy to prove is not as bad as it can be.
The
deliberations over the Palestinians and the methods of coping with the
blockade should be converted into a discussion about the Israelis -
about those who make policy and the many diligent people who carry it
out, about the many citizens who support and encourage it. Instead of
discussing quantities of diesel fuel and flour, the talk should be of
the logic behind the siege and those who impose it. ....................
People
in the Israeli cabinet, Defense Ministry and Shin Bet security service
know full well what they are doing when they prohibit anything other
than essential food or medicines from passing through the checkpoints,
when they prohibit the entry of raw materials and the exit of
agricultural and industrial products and prevent normal human traffic
for studies, medical care, work or family. Don't underestimate them and
don't belittle their judgment. They knew perfectly well when they
decided more than two years ago on the tightest closure of the Gaza
Strip since the closure policy began in 1991, that industry would
collapse, agriculture would wither, tens of thousands of young people
would join the jobless and hopeless, that it would be hard for schools
to operate and education would suffer, that sewage would back up and
seep into the drinking water, that water would no longer reach the
upper floors of apartment buildings.
This policy
was presented to the Israeli public in a semiofficial manner as a
justified punishment of the Palestinians for electing Hamas (and to
hell with international law). "Quarterofficially" we know there was an
expectation, or a prediction, that the siege would cause the Gazans to
loathe Hamas and end its government in Gaza (after it lost its official
grip on the West Bank). That was certainly the hope of the Ramallah
government.
Gazans have a bellyful of complaints, and
rightfully so, about the Hamas regime. It has already proven itself -
mainly to Fatah members - as a regime of fear and repression. But the
kind of punishment tactic currently in force is exactly what
strengthens Hamas. Instead of the movement being judged according to
its ability to run a government and meet its governmental obligations
to ensure its citizens' welfare, it can blame the emergency situation
created by the siege for every manifestation of immaturity and
unprofessionalism.
The
public feels that the government is part of it. Like the public, the
government is a target for the occupation's cruelty. The brutal siege
also saves Hamas from having to cope with the contradiction between its
platform (the liberation of all of Palestine) and its integration,
despite its denials, into the institutions created by the Oslo Accords.
If Israel jeopardizes the lives of premature babies and causes business
owners, including supporters of Oslo and Yasser Arafat, to go broke,
the Hamas government can present itself as resisting the occupation by
its very nature. The extraordinary conditions of the extreme siege and
the disconnection between Gaza and the West Bank (another intentional
Israeli policy) have made the possibility of holding new Palestinian
general elections a very distant one. Hamas can thus bolster its rule
with coercion, wages, charity and the consoling power of religion.
And perhaps that is exactly what the Shin Bet, Israel Defense Forces
and government want?
Dean
Andromidas Executive Intelligence Review
(EIR) Fri, 18 Jan 2002
Comment: As
it happened Sharon succeeded and managed to undermine Arafat and thus
bringing Hamas to power. This gave Israel the perfect excuse to up the
ante and we now see the Palestinian genocide
gathering speed.
........................................................................
The
latest tightening of Israel's chokehold on Gaza - ending all supplies
into the Strip for more than a week - has produced immediate and
shocking consequences for Gaza's 1.5 million inhabitants.
The
refusal to allow in fuel has forced the shutting down of Gaza's only
power station, creating a blackout that pushed Palestinians bearing
candles on to the streets in protest last week. A water and sanitation
crisis are expected to follow.
(...)
Comment:
"Israel is at
war with every single man, woman and child."
What
is happening in Gaza and the occupied territories is nothing short of
Genocide, pure and simple evil. People in the west may feel powerless
to do anything about this extremely dire situation; but you can empower
yourself to gain knowledge about what is really happening in the world,
away from the drone of the MSM. You can inform those who really want to
know and understand, by discussing Psychopathy and Ponerology.
......................................................................................................
Matthew Alford and
Robbie Graham The Guardian
(...)
So, altering scripts, financing films, suppressing the truth - it's
worrying enough. But there are cases where some believe the CIA's
activities in Hollywood have gone further - far enough, in fact, to be
the stuff of movies. In June 1997, the screenwriter Gary DeVore was
working on the screenplay for his directorial debut. It was to be an
action movie set against the backdrop of the US invasion of Panama in
1989, which led to the overthrow of dictator Manuel Noriega. According
to his wife, Wendy, DeVore had been talking to an old friend - the
CIA's Chase Brandon - about Noriega's regime and US counternarcotic
programmes in Latin America. Wendy told CNN: "He had been very
disturbed over some of the things that he had been finding in his
research. He was researching the United States invasion of Panama,
because he was setting the actual story that he was writing against
this; and the overthrow of Noriega and the enormous amounts of money
laundering in the Panamanian banks, also our own government's money
laundering."
At
the end of that month, DeVore had been in Santa Fe, New Mexico, working
on another project. He was travelling back to California when, at
1.15am on June 28, he called Wendy, a call she says has been excised
from phone records. She told CNN she was "terribly alarmed" because he
was speaking as though he were under duress. She was sure "someone was
in the car with him". That was the last time Wendy DeVore heard from
her husband.
Juan
Cole Hasht-e-Sobh
Comment: The
Taliban have not
made such threats in the past, being concerned mainly with defending
Afghanistan. It is highly likely therefore that this is a piece of
French of American or Israeli propaganda designed to scare the French
into supporting the troops and bolstering Sarkozy's fascistic policies
and the NATO war effort in Afghanistan.
...But watching this revealing
French documentary changes the rumours into disturbing facts. "Bin
Laden, the failings of a manhunt", produced by Emmanuel Razavi and Eric
de Lavarene,
two French filmmakers and reporters, assesses and confirms the claims
of French soldiers that they could have killed Usamah within two
operations, but the American forces prevented them. This film has not
been broadcast publicly yet and is to be broadcast by Planet, a French
network.
(Description
of Source: Kabul Hasht-e-Sobh in Dari Kabul Hasht-e Sobh in Dari -
Eight-page secular daily launched in May 2007; editor-in-chief, Qasim
Akhgar, is a political analyst and Head of the Association for the
Freedom of Speech. )
Text of article,
"Bin-Ladin on the run? The rumour which was fact", by Afghan
independent secular daily newspaper Hasht-e Sobh on 29 September
...
BF said...
This
report sheds light on the oft-repeated claim by Senator John McCain
during his Presidential campaign, that he knew how to capture Mr Usamah
Bin Laden. He was repeatedly confronted with the question whether it
was not patriotic that he shared his knowledge with the Bush
Administration then, months in advance of possibly becoming President
himself. Remarkably, he always found a way to escape answering this
straightforward question.
As an aside, the above story contains at
least three remarkable coincidences. Firstly, the Persian/Dari words
"Hasht" and "Sobh" mean "Eight" and "Morning", respectively (thus, Hasht-e
Sobh means Eight in the Morning). Now, the time difference
between Tehran and Kabul is exactly
one hour,* and such that 8 am Kabul's time is exactly 7 am Tehran's
time. Secondly, and remarkably, there is an Iranian feature film named
"Tehran Sa'at-e Haft-e Sobh"** (Tehran, Seven O'clock in the Morning
--- in
Persian/Dari, "Haft" stands for "Seven"), made in 2004, which not only
is extremely hilarious, but is one of the most intelligent observations
of causally unrelated but meaningfully related events in the lives of a
number of apparently randomly-sampled dwellers of a large city (in this
case Tehran --- the story-line of the film is rendered continuous by
showing the main, but unrelated, characters in the same but limited
number of frames). Thirdly, and again remarkably, the Director of this
film is Mr Amir-Shahab Razavian.** This name is to be contrasted with
Emmanuel Razavi, one of the co-produces of the French documentary at
issue. Of course, Razavi is different from Razavian,
but both names refer to the principal name Reza (they mean of,
or related to, Reza; Razavian is also the plural of Razavi).
BF.
_____
* For the international time zones, one may consult:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/
** For details, the reader is
referred to:
http://www.citwf.com/film344824.htm
I
was dismayed to discover that one of the stories in this film is in
fact entirely based on an account in the biography of the Persian Sufi
poet Farid ud-Din Attar Neyshabury (1145-1221), without this fact being
explicitly acknowledged in the film credits (Attar became a mystic as a
result of the very event described in this account).
..................
BF said...
For Randi
and others who might be interested.
According to the analysis by Representative Press, Ms Bhutto
misspoke the name; she had meant to say "Daniel Pearl". For details,
please watch the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IIn_UnLO9I
and consult its corresponding Information
Box on the right-hand side of the screen (more info should
be clicked on).
BF._____
ps) In my previous comment, "co-produces" should have been
"co-producers".
...................
...............................................................................
..............................................................................
The
big bang is not that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's majority
Shi'ite/Kurdish 37-member cabinet in Baghdad has approved the draft of
a security pact with the George W Bush (and Barack Obama)
administrations allowing the US military to stay in Iraq for three more
years; it's that the 30-strong Sadrist bloc will move heaven and Earth
- including massive nationwide protests - to bloc the pact in the Iraqi
National Assembly.
....................
Paul J.
Balles Redress Information & Analysis
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
casper and fw10:
casper nov-18-08
Today's news is delivery today just as it has been everyday
for at least two weeks.
Bernake to
Ron Paul, House Banking Committee today, "No Mr. Paul, in the meetings
I have been attending around the world we are not discussing any new
monetary system to replace the existing Dollar System and no, there are
no discussions about gold other than how much the Central Banks intend
to sell".
Congressman
La Touche (Ohio) to Paulson, "Why have you and your representative John
Dugan (Comptroller of the Currency) refused to accept an application
from National City Bank/Cleveland for Tarp funds (taxpayer funds) while
allowing PNC Bank to sell 15% of their equity to Treasury then use the
money to acquire under duress Nat'l City, a Bank with level one capital
in excess of PNC Bank"? Nat'l City is a well capitalized Bank. You are
FORCING their takeover by PNC. You are not only picking winners and
losers, you are financing the winners and helping them take over Natl
City at no cost, a bank which survived the Civil War and the great
depression. John Dugan was PNC's Corporate Attorney prior to becoming
Comptroller of the Currency. WHY"? Spin and B.S. was Paulsons answer.
PNC doubles its size using taxpayer funds and its stock to do so,
becomes fifth largest bank in U.S. (deposits).
CORRUPTION
on display for the entire world to see. Friends of Paulson survive and
grow. Not a friend? Into the toilet with you and your 29,000
employees.
One
hundred large banks (Financial Services Roundtable) and the
Consumer
Federation of America make application to Treasury to forgive up
to 40%
of a borrowers credit card debt to help get through this crisis. First
time in history banks and consumers on same side. NO says John Dugan,
Comptroller of Currency on behalf of Paulson. Not allowed. Why?
Probably because the debt has been securitized and sold to foreigners.
Still think they work for you?
Where
did the 3T created OFTH go? Won't tell says Bernake. Fox News and
Bloomberg suing Fed Res under Freedom of Information Act to force
disclosure. This is your grandchildren's slavery being discussed here.
Why
was "big man" lying last week? Because the bad guys "moved" the money
again and "our side" has egg on face and not wanting to admit they
can't protect the money. BTW, all money retrieved from the VATICAN
leaving them broke and a bit upset. Why have they been lying this week?
"They" haven't. They have said nothing all week. Why no deliveries day
by day? Unknown.
G-20 given some cards, staying here till we receive to be
sure it happens. One more reason delv expected at any moment.
HUBER,
please don't discuss our numbers on the net. 78 is a reference to
number of programs not countries and is itself incorrect. There
were/are 112 IMF programs not counting the big six and this is just
domestic stuff not counting projects, etc...
BUSH-from
the G-20. "We are not here to change the system". Prime Minister ASO
(JAPAN) issues statement, "the U.S. Dollar should remain the worlds
reserve currency". Statement from BEIJING, "the U.S. has used the
Dollar to plunder the world and the system must be changed". U.S.,
England, Germany, Japan, Israel, Vatican vs France, China, Russia,
Brazil, India, European Union and 160 other countries. Do the
countries
decide? Or is it the behind the scenes banking powers?
AIG bailout now at 167B (up from original 85B) and
counting.
Credit card debt, commercial real estate and credit
default swaps ticking time bombs. Tick, tick, tick.
Russian stock markets (2) closed 30 times so far, Ruble and
Russia crashing.
Insurance
Companies (Hartford, Transamerica, etc.) say gimmie some of that
there taxpayer candy, apply to acquire S&L's or Banks to get
at it.
BUSH says
"I'm a free marketer but must be new rules and transparency". (He is
describing Basel II and III). WE hear he walked out of the meetings
when didn't get his way with others laughing, cheering and clapping.
BUSH mentions World Depression greater than great
depression. Also mentioned elsewhere around the world.
Kissinger says "gotta have Hillary". Obama must be stupid or
"on board".
Can
use em one time only agra seeds from MONSANTO causing massive
number of
suicides in INDIA and Latin America (crop failure and can't afford
re-buy). Is it any wonder we are so hated?
HENNEGAN says WANTA says "all bad guys getting immunity".
WANTA sold out to Satanic Cult known as Illuminati.
After BERNAKE finished meetings in GERMANY last week he
went-guess where? ITALY.....guess whats in ITALY.
As
Secretary of State Hillary gets Immunity. Who appoints Secretary of
State? Whats next, ERIC HOLDER the facilitator of the MARC RICH
pardons as Atty. General? Poor OBAMA supporters, they have
already been
fleeced and don't even know it. They have their "King" so
now its back
to work at two jobs and blind ignorance. They are not stupid, just
uninformed and way to busy to become informed. It's a damn shame
really. I for one was rooting for his supporters to be right and me and
mine to be wrong. I knew better but I was hoping. One must be blind in
both eyes not to see this in your face betrayal.
53,000 layoffs at CITI just announced.
540B just announced for mutual fund bailout. Somebody keep
track my calculator is out of zero's.
Bush
and Paulson say NO to 25B to bail auto industry but "here you are boys"
to three banks @ 25B EACH. This gang of financial criminals continue
greasing each others palms while the real world crashes.
PLEASE read the
article about Glass Stegall on www.fourwinds10.com.
It explains the ongoing never ending bribery and corruption of
congress
and how 300M was paid to them to eliminate this last line of
defense
against what is now happening. None of this is an "accident". It
was
bought and paid for, all roads lead to Congress and Wall Street
pocketed hundreds of billions along the way and were happy to share
the loot scammed from the world with those who eliminated the laws
which allowed it to happen. And now? And now they are into round two,
the taxpayer bailout of the criminals who pulled the heist in the first
place. Welcome to modern day America.
While
most of the world speaks daily about a "new financial order" every
other word out of Gordon Browns mouth is Global this Global that. He is
the number one pimp for One World Order, New World
Order Illuminati and
the enemy of every countries national sovereignty.
SARKOZY/BUSH
in deep freeze at meetings. Sarkozy issues statement U.S. intent to
surround Russia with "defensive missile shield" not in anyone's best
interest. BUSH livid.
Hmmm,
lets see now, States, Cities, pension funds, Bear Stearns, Banks large
and small-foreign and domestic, AIG-(3), credit card companies, mutual
funds, auto industry, Freddie/fannie, increase in jobless benefits, new
stimulus (600B being discussed), and on and on and on it goes. There
will be consequences. Spa treatments for them, the poor house for us.
What now follows is guess work and small talk.
Only
after the day passes are we sure deliveries are not today. It is not
just "us" who receive daily assurances of deliveries followed by some
excuse or another followed by more assurances for "tomorrow". After
days turn into weeks we of course know something just ain't right but
we don't know what. Others, at higher levels, receive assurances of
their own only to be stiffed when we don't receive allowing them to
receive.
There
is a degree of comfort knowing that big people are receiving the same
assurances as little people. For a little while. Then it becomes
clear
their assurances are no more valuable than our own and we learn there
are only liars and those being lied to. They don't understand it any
more than we do. There is always identifiable "progress" but it
does
not result in deliveries. It is preparation so that when they occur
dominoes are ready to fall without interruption. And it progress's
every day in a variety of locations. "Leaks" result in people getting
fired. Big people. The secrecy is intense. WE have lots of "secret"
info not appropriate to this venue or the net. It's all very positive
and spells delv at any moment. WE have enough of this info to believe,
truly believe, that delv's may arrive at any moment. WE are just as
frustrated and flabbergasted as you are but our proximity to
dependable information allows us to understand these delays better
than
you perhaps and to know that the desired outcome is imminent. So
please
take comfort in our confidence even if yours is waning.
Naturally
we are concerned with such things as the Bernake comments to Paul
televised worldwide on C-Span. WE cannot explain but we can guess that
neither he or the Fed Res are part of the NEW. Besides, we know "they"
are all bald faced liars anyway. Perhaps parallel systems will operate
side by side for a while as we heard so many years ago. Perhaps the NEW
is Global and controlled from abroad. Our side is not going to allow us
to be exposed to HLS and the P.Act, to BUSH and PAULSON and
CHERTOFF,
so whatever is going on we will be safe we think. With trillions in tax
receipts available to them upon funding it is obvious the best interest
of the country means nothing to them, only staying in power and
avoiding announcements, exposure and arrest. WE have heard little
to
nothing about arrest, etc. for the past two weeks except the occasional
statement "they are not going to be allowed to get away with it". We
know about meetings and we hear about "deals" but get no details.
The
MELTDOWN continues. It is serious beyond words. There is no other
"source of funds" sufficient to "save the world". The BUSH/PAULSON/FED
RES/CONGRESSIONAL bailout endeavor, currently at several trillion plus
more mentioned every day is a Band-Aid. "THEY" may be attempting to
kill time to get closer to "presidential pardon time". They are
obviously saying "to hell with tomorrow, to hell with six months from
now, print money, push those computer buttons". Let the crash, the
greater greatest depression, the hyperinflation, come on "their"
watch.
The issue is not what are they doing and "they" now includes OBAMA. The
issue is what in the world are our guys doing? WE don't know. Decisions
are now occurring above our sources sources pay grade. Besides, they
are pros, we are amateurs.
In spite of this WE believe deliveries will occur at any
moment.
Follow the instructions and keep your head down.
casper 11-18-08
AND
casper
11-19-08 #2
The
net is full of opinions including today's response to Casper by
Whistleblower
who
is obviously a very nice well intentioned individual with whom I have
never spoken.
OUR
Intel does not agree with
his. WE are informed the Germain Trust, which is for humanitarian
purposes only, is open now and will not close again (it usually opens
at Easter and Christmas only then closes if deliveries do not
occur
timely). What we are now awaiting is unrelated to this trust.
WE
hear more about it than
what is included here. ALL of it disagrees with Whistleblowers Intel.
He does his best, we do our best. Our Intel originates within the World
Court.
WE
cannot "guarantee" accuracy in all we say but by now you understand we
go to extremes in our efforts to be accurate.
WE
hear tomorrow and those behind us are being told Friday.
casper nov.-19-08 no.2
AND
WHISTLEBLOWER'S
RESPONSE TO CASPER UPDATE OF NOV. 18, 2008
AND
.....
WE THE
PEOPLE CAN BY-PASS EVERYTHING AND EVERYBODY and force them to answer;
why are you working for the banks not us?
why are you violating the Constitution every day?
why are you selling out our grandchildren's future?
why
can't I get so & so on the phone?
why
are all the lines busy?
why
was Cheney indicted?
why do you work for these criminals?
why
has every dept and agency of the government been incorporated?
why are you holding so many Americans as political prisoners?
how's
the weather?
what time is it?
Well
what do you say gang? Deliver by Friday ...OR..... WE go dialing for
answers?
The
task is simple, lets prepare to begin Monday.
Should
you be asked "why are
you doing this"? The answer is "we are sick and tired of Washington's
corruption and we are responding to the televised call for action from
The National Taxpayers Union".
ATTENTION:
FOURWINDS READERS! FROM CASPER:DIALING FOR ANSWERS! next monday (( casper nov
19th no.1 ))
AND
U.S.
CONGRESS PHONE NUMBERS / PRES. BUSH / PRES. ELECT OBAMA
=============================================
Posted Nov. 18,
2008
This video
contains images depicting the reality and horror of war and should only
be viewed by a mature audience.
Ilan Pappe
1 hr 27 min 59
sec - Jul 12, 2007
Israeli
historian Ilan Pappe describes the period around the declaration of
Israel’s independence as one during which the indigenous Palestinian
population was ethnically cleansed from the land when they were forced
from their homes or fled in terror after hearing news of rapes and
massacres at other villages. Today, the situation is not much better
for the Palestinians under Israeli rule. “To make things so difficult
for the Palestinians so that anyone who wants a normal life will leave.”
TO VIEW THIS VIDEO CLICK ON:
...........................................
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
Comment: Do you remember that a few years ago Israeli settlers were pulled out of Gaza? Remember how their (relative) suffering at the loss of their farms and houses was largely covered by the world media?
It was all part of a strategy of preparation for war. As Jonathan Cook writes, the purpose was to persuade the world that the occupation of Gaza was over - and now a logic of unremitting force applies. Indeed, they couldn't completely destroy the people of a land they partly occupied. But now they can.
Where is the world media now that the real suffering of Gaza is reaching its climax?