icke............http://www.davidicke.com/content/blogcategory/30/48/
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 
from archives:

David Icke on animal welfare as Green Party spokesman in 1989

The seeds of what was to come ...
Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke - 'Top British Hero'

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on the term he invented - Problem-Reaction-Solution

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on the Mystic Challenge

(in 1999)

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on Bohemian Grove and Satanism

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on GM food and artificial additives

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke - Talking about 'Repeaters'

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on 'intelligence'

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke on the 'Hassle Free Zone'

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke- How We're Controlled: Part One

(Delivered in 1996)

Click here to watch ...

Part Two ...
........................................

David Icke on Religion

Click here to watch ...
........................................

David Icke ... thoughts on a crazy world

What he said in ... 1994

Click here to watch ...

Media, Interview Requests and PR

Please direct all interview requests, media appearances and public relations matters to our PR representative Charlie O'Connor from Archipelago PR

info@archipelagopr.co.uk
 
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

David Icke and Richard War-man

How a war-man from Canada - a 'human rights lawyer' - has tried to stop David Icke and so many others having the right to express their freedom of speech.
Does anyone know anything that we should know about Richard War-man?
If so contact ... info@archipelagopr.co.uk
Here is a documentary on David Icke and featuring War-man in 2001 (not all that is said in the reporter's commentary about David Icke is true).
Click here to watch ...
..................................................

Who is Richard War-man?

Richard War-man receives award from the Canadian Jewish Congress (Bronfman family) which has also campaigned to deny David Icke's freedom of speech. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about.
'I’ve come to the conclusion that I can be most effective by using what I like to describe as a ‘maximum disruption’ approach. … If I think that they’ve violated the Canadian Human Rights Act, then I’ll look at all of the potential targets and file complaints against them starting on a ‘worst offender’ basis, although sometimes if I just find people to be particularly annoying this may move them up the list a bit'
Warman continues:
'The ‘maximum disruption’ part comes in because wherever I think it will be most helpful, or even if I just feel it will be the most fun, I strongly believe in hitting the neo-nazis on as many of these fronts as possible either at the same time or one after the other. I say this because it keeps them off-balance and forces them to respond to things that focus their energies on defending themselves …'
Read more ...
.........................................................

War-man's Fake Personas

On Warman pretending to be a woman named: Mary Dufford.
'It's an account that I previously used to correspond with Mr. [Eldon] Warman. Whenever there were questions about issues surrounding the case, or if there was something that I wished to know more about his theories, then I would simply send him e-mails using this pseudonym account, posing as a supporter of his.
I apologize for the wording of the initiating e-mail, but I have found in the past that you tend to get a better response or a more rapid response if you pose as a supporter who accepts the theories, or at least is interested in knowing more about.'
Testimony of Richard Warman
Read more ...
..........................................................

Libel Suits By Richard War-man

(And these are just a few)
Read more ...
..............................................................
Please circulate all of the above information far and wide....................
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
and more:
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Yes! Canadian Human Rights Commission Exposed in Federal Court
'Despite an Eastern Ontario snowfall that delayed the appearance of his counsel, Barbara Kulaszka, for an hour and a half, Marc Lemire walked out of Federal Court in Toronto today a happy man. By sheer persistence, he had wrung out of the Canadian Human Rights Commissions some amazing admissions.
At least one investigator for the Canadian Human Rights Commission has adopted a false Internet persona and trolled the Internet engaging in conversations with prospective victims. In other words, the CHRC is spying on Canadians, not observing and investigating, but participating and instigating ...'
  
   ... 'Ironically, this was the biggest crowd of supporters ever to attend one of the Lemire hearings and it included several victims of Richard Warman. The atmosphere was enthusiastic but peaceful. “The bogus threat of security and the drama queen scene of Mr. Warman and Commission lawyers even being accompanied to the washroom by bodyguards has been a costly and deliberate tactic to vilify the victims, to make us appear to be a threat. I’m glad that this time, both sides were allowed to approach the bench on a level playing field,” Paul Fromm commented.'
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Canadian Human Rights Commission (massively used by former employee Richard Warman) called before the Federal Court of Canada to justify Spying Operations on Canadians
'The evidence Marc Lemire is challenging before the Federal Court is explosive and will blow the whole agenda of the CHRC into the open. In a 300 page record, prepared by lead counsel Barbara Kulaszka, the abuse of Section 37 by the Commission was laid out in amazingly clear detail. Those 300 pages decimate the Canadian Human Rights Commission’s claims and expose the spying operations of Canada’s Thought Control apparatus.'
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
'Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place … And that place was NOT in public!' - Richard Warman referring to Senator Anne Cools 
 
Senator Cools
'Is Richard Warman a racist bigot, or was he "just following orders" issued by his masters at the Canadian Human Rights Commission when he posted the headlined message above on a Freedomsite forum on September 5, 2003? Whatever the answer, the same CHRC that has ruled Bible verses to be hate speech doesn't seem to consider these words to be a problem.

But they are a big problem, for both Richard Warman and the CHRC, and the rest of what he wrote only makes matters worse.

“Not only is Canadian Senator Anne Cools a Negro, she is also an immigrant! And she is also one helluva preachy cunt. She does NOT belong in my Canada. My Anglo-Germanic people were here before there was a Canada and her kind have jumped in, polluted our race, and forced their bullshit down our throats.
Time to go back to when the women nigger imports knew their place…
And that place was NOT in public!
"

It may be mere coincidence that Richard Warman is in fact an Anglo-German, but it is not likely a coincidence at all that the owner of the website where Richard Warman posted this racist screed against Sen. Anne Cools came under attack by the CHRC shortly after Richard Warman began his complaint-less investigation there.'
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
At last, the mainstream media is asking the obvious question ... who the hell is Richard Warman?
 
Warman pulls down a David Icke talk poster 
Why should Richard Warman be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition?
From Macleans Magazine 
'Who has availed themselves of the "human rights" protected by Section XIII? In its entire history, over half of all cases have been brought by a sole "complainant," one Richard Warman. Indeed, Mr. Warman has been a plaintiff on every single Section XIII case before the federal "human rights" star chamber since 2002 — and he's won every one.
That would suggest that no man in any free society anywhere on the planet has been so comprehensively deprived of his human rights. Well, no. Mr. Warman doesn't have to demonstrate that he's been deprived of his human rights, only that it's "likely" (i.e. "highly un-") that someone somewhere will be deprived of some right sometime. Who is Richard Warman? What's his story? Well, he's a former employee of the Canadian Human Rights Commission: an investigator. Same as Shirlene McGovern.

Isn't there something a little odd in a supposedly necessary Canadian federal "human rights" system used all but exclusively by one lone Canadian who served as a long-time employee of that system? Why should Richard Warman be the only citizen to have his own personal inquisition?'
A must see. 
Another fact: In the three decades of the Canadian 'Human Rights' Tribunal's existence, not a single 'defendant' has ever been 'acquitted'.
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Killing the Hundredth Monkey

'The Battle for Control and Censorship of Canada’s Internet by the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress.'

Read more ..

 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
What 'human rights' lawyer Richard Warman thinks of David Icke's right to free speech and your right to hear it
 
This is what Canadian 'human rights' lawyer Richard Warman told the London Independent on Sunday when asked why he sought to have David Icke's public events banned:
'He has taken all the conspiracy theories that ever existed and melded them together to create an even greater conspiracy of his own. His writings may be the work of a madman, or of a genuine racist. Either way they are very dangerous ...
... 'If he's unstable then so are his followers, who hang on his every word. What benefit can there be in allowing him to speak?'
That's right, a self-styled 'human rights' campaigner actually said: 'What benefit can there be in allowing him to speak?'
No, actually, they are also the opinions of David Icke 
Please circulate all of this information far and and wide. Thank-you.  
 
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Three quarters of Brixton Academy tickets now gone four months in advance (see how effective you are, Mr. Warman?)
 
David's seven-hour presentation with hundreds of illustrations takes place on Saturday, May 24th 
 
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Teleportation: fact or fiction?
'Making someone vanish in New York and appear an instant later in Tokyo is way beyond current technology but just might be possible in the far future, physicists told an audience at MIT attending a preview and panel discussion about the movie Jumper on Wednesday.'
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Unbelievable -- What Are the Odds of This Happening?
'Life can sometimes produce fascinating, extraordinary coincidences. Here are a few of the most amazing ones ...
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Who Killed Martin Luther King?
 

 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
Black Americans Hosed By Obama

'Senator Barack Obama voted for the June 2007 immigration amnesty that would have doubled current immigration levels to two million annually.  He voted for complete amnesty for in excess of 20 million illegal aliens.  He voted for the Dream Act that took hundreds of millions of dollars out of the hands of black American college kids' hands- only to give it to illegal alien students.  Fortunately, senators under enormous pressure from American voters ­ defeated both bills, over and over again.
 
What's the problem here?
 
Barack Obama represents the best of African-Americans.  Yet, he fails black America miserably!  He stands in favor of flooding this country with lower wage labor that destroys any chance for African-Americans to gain a living wage.'
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
 Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9/11
 
'Think of this as part two of Recherche du trillions perdu, my Online Journal article on Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as I mentioned, was buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch.'

Read more ...

 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
The EU fascist dictatorship rolls on ... lawyers say no to Poland's biotech ban
'European Commission lawyers have stopped Poland's move to ban trade and plantings of genetically modified (GMO) seeds, saying it had no scientific justification, the EU's Official Journal said on Monday. Poland's plans for what amounts to a national GMO ban, announced last year, quickly drew criticism from experts at the EU executive who routinely scrutinize any such proposals to check that they comply fully with EU law.'
.............................................
 EU treaty 'will shift power to Europe'
  
  'Where do I sign, sir? Here sir? Thank-you sir, it's an honour, sir, thank-you sir ...' 
'The EU Reform Treaty backed by Gordon Brown paves the way for "a massive and fundamental" shift of power to Europe, a senior Labour MP charged by Parliament with assessing its impact will tell the Commons today.
The comments from Michael Connarty, the pro-European chairman of the all-party European Scrutiny Committee, will mark an explosive start to five weeks of Parliamentary debate on the Treaty - and stoke the growing clamour for a referendum.'
Read more ...
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Sunday, 20 January 2008
Canada Adds US and Israel to List Of Nations That Torture
 'In Canada, the United States has joined a notorious group of countries -- Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Afghanistan and China, among others -- as a place where foreigners risk torture and abuse, according to a training manual for Canadian diplomats that was accidentally given this week to Amnesty International lawyers.'
... But then says 'sorry' to its masters ...
Canada foreign minister regrets 'torture list'
'The Canadian foreign minister has apologised for including the US and Israel on a list of states where prisoners are at risk of torture. Maxime Bernier said the list, which formed part of a manual on torture awareness given to diplomats, "wrongly includes some of our closest allies". Mr Bernier insisted the manual was not a policy document and did not convey the official views of his government. The listing was criticised by the US and Israel, who demanded it be changed.' 
  
 
'Please don't waterboard me, sir, please sir, sorry sir ...' 
 
Sunday, 20 January 2008
World not running out of oil, say experts
'Doom-laden forecasts that world oil supplies are poised to fall off the edge of a cliff are wide of the mark, according to leading oil industry experts who gave warning that human factors, not geology, will drive the oil market.'
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Tuesday, 22 January 2008
 Israeli satellite to spy on Iran
 
'Israel has successfully launched a spy satellite which will be used to gather intelligence on Iran's activities, a new report says. The TECSAR satellite is particularly important for Israel since it can be used to 'keep tabs on Iran's nuclear program', the report said citing unnamed Israeli officials.'
 
Monday, 21 January 2008
Bad Day At The Casino
'Global stock markets have tumbled amid growing fears of a recession in the US, and despite recovering slightly in the afternoon, were heading for big losses. London's FTSE 100 index fell 4.2% to 5,653.2. In Paris the Cac-40 fell 5.5%, and Frankfurt's Dax dropped 5.9%.'
 
Monday, 21 January 2008
Republicans: FISA spying authority in Constitution

'Authority to conduct warrantless electronic surveillance comes from the Constitution and is vital to stopping foreign terrorist attacks and spies, says a Republican staff assessment of the revised Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.'

Read more ...

 
Monday, 21 January 2008
Hands down, it's the law
 
'Red tape and resistance have tripped up the state's first crack at collecting fingerprints for an estimated 1 million people who work in Texas public schools. Most of the troubles are rooted in bureaucracy, but some bubbled up out of protest. An Austin teacher this week refused to give her fingerprints, a move that will cost her teaching license under state law.'
 
Monday, 21 January 2008
Spychief Plan To Police Internet Is Likely Tied To S 1959

'Would Americans be outraged if the government decided to read every piece of our personal mail? Think about it, letters and notes which are sent to a lover, things we all say in anger, regret later, and never follow-through on? What about confidential financial information, plans to trump your competitor with a new product or service, and a host of personal issues that are too numerous to mention?'

Read more ...

 
Monday, 21 January 2008
Controlling Cell Behavior with Magnets

'For the first time, researchers have demonstrated a means of controlling cell functions with a physical, rather than chemical, signal. Using a magnetic field to pull together tiny beads targeted to particular cell receptors, Harvard researchers made cells take up calcium, and then stop, then take it up again.'

Read more ...

 
Monday, 21 January 2008
David Icke on Kerrang Radio
..........................................
..........................................
......................................... 
 
Monday, 21 January 2008
David Icke on Secret Societies
 
Monday, 21 January 2008
David Icke 1991 ( 911?)  and 2006
..............................//////////////////////////////////////////....
 
 
............................telepportation...
http://www.newscientist.com/blog/space/2008/01/teleportation-fact-or-fiction.html
...........///////////........odds.unbelievable......
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/1/22/unbelievable-what-are-the-odds-of-this-happening.aspx
..............///////////.............who  killed mlk   http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/89.html
.............////////////.......black-americans...........
http://www.rense.com/general80/hosed.htm
................////////////.........following  trillions....
http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1047.shtml
.......good-good!.........///////////...........eu-facist-poland..
http://www.enn.com/sci-tech/article/29656
................//////////////////...........eu-treaty.......
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml%3Bjsessionid%3DNXOS41G1MHGRXQFIQMFCFGGAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/21/neu121.xml
.............../////////////........israeli-satellite to spy on iran...
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=39679&sectionid=351020101
..........write-to-us...
http://www.presstv.ir/contactus.aspx
.....////////////........bad-day....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7199552.stm
..............//////////.........fisa....
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080121/NATION/884596216/1001
.............///////////..........hands-down...
http://www.dallasnews.com/s/advertising/interstitial/index-dallas.htm?fw=http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-fingerprint_19cco.ART.North.Edition1.3777676.html
,...........////////////...........spychief....
http://justanothercoverup.com/?p=387
.......good-good!......////////////..........
..........cell-behavior...
http://www.technologyreview.com/Nanotech/20087/
................/////////////......
 
.....kerrang............
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-685655814036456747&q=David+icke&total=1757&start=20&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=9
 
..............
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5573442369375537281&q=David+icke&total=1756&start=40&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3
 
 
......................
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-9083701434635041030&q=David+icke&total=1756&start=40&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1
 
..................///////////...........secret societies......
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=1270081493781521177&q=David+icke&total=1757&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7
...................////////////....
......1991....????   .....  on-911              ...............
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=1505950948532590200&q=David+icke&total=1757&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
 
.............//////////......satanist?...........
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=AlnR3l8cqOo&feature=related
...............///////////.........the-ballad......
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=A0zYkruN0mM
.............////////////......not-alone....
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=4160158855712039004&q=song+about+David+icke&total=16&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0
 
...........///////////..........gaza.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/meast/01/20/israel.palestinians.ap/index.html
 
............////////////.....mac.cain...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7198524.stm
.........../////////.........nevada-second.........
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/19/politics/horserace/entry3732071.shtml
..........///////////////.....green-party..........
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=e6fe6VBG3e0&feature=related
................////////////........hero.....
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=18tRLhMMnNc&feature=related
........////////........PRS...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=82iQeHCabJU&feature=related
.........///////........mystic-challenge.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SPKV3rq_D9k&feature=related
.........////////.......bohemian-grove...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=v1U-Z-8mvJY&feature=related
..........//////////.   gm-food......and aspartame...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kelCN8J84_I&feature=related
 
 
/////////..............repeaters.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=MoXkTg-Uoz4&feature=related
..........////////.......intelligence..
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=j82oX7RGGcc&feature=related
........///////////...hassle-free-.......
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=tONyd5lLp50&feature=related
........
//////........controlled...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=12j1_rKbUUM
........and.........
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=H7u_UgjjO4s&feature=related
............
 
///////////..........religions.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoK_JaWJeBE&feature=related
........../////////.....said in 94...........
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBJKCz6Xhzs
 
............/////////////................
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Saturday, 19 January 2008
Minnesota Man Tasered to Death for 'Non-Compliance'
'Authorities are investigating the death of a 29-year-old Fridley man shot with a Taser by state troopers, who said he had become “uncooperative” after a rush-hour crash Tuesday evening. The victim was identified by his father as Mark C. Backlund. Gordon Backlund said his son was on his way to pick up his parents at the airport after they had taken a short trip to Florida.'
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1708
...........................................................................
 
Saturday, 19 January 2008
Tough questions for Taser executive

As Toronto police consider spending millions on stun guns, forum audience comes armed with critical research

 
'The packed auditorium listened in silence as the co-founder of Arizona-based Taser International Inc. explained at a public forum in Toronto last night the science behind the stun guns, but it was during the 75-minute question period that Thomas Smith found he had to defend himself from stinging accusations. Mr. Smith, who was in town as the Toronto Police Services Board weighs a request by Police Chief Bill Blair to spend $8.6-million to equip and train every front-line officer with a taser, was confronted by the sister of a man who died after being tasered by Vancouver police.'
(...)
During the forum, Patti Gillman, whose brother, Robert Bagnell, died after being tasered by Vancouver police in 2004, said she was speaking on behalf of the more than 300 North Americans who have died after being shot by the guns since 2003.
"[My brother] was unarmed, he was of no credible threat to police or to the public and there were 13 police officers there the night that he died," she said. "I know that most thinking Canadians would concur that the use of tasers was not only unjustified the night my brother died, but was also likely unjustified in the majority of cases."
Ms. Gillman - who lodged a formal complaint after learning that a veteran Victoria police officer who played a pivotal role in a 1998 pilot program that led to his force adopting the weapons permanently had received several payments from Taser International since 1999 - asked Mr. Smith how many other Canadian police officers had been paid by the company.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080118.wtaser18/BNStory/National/?cid=al_gam_nletter_newsUp
.................................................................................
 
Saturday, 19 January 2008
Putting Orwellian tribunals on trial
'Canada's human rights commissions are a threat to freedom of speech in America, says Ezra Levant, the latest in a long string of conservative writers to be brought before Canada's quasi-judicial panels for speech about Islam. But Mr. Levant is not taking it lying down and is using the Internet and his own legal savvy and flair for publicity to put the tribunals themselves on trial before the public, in Canada and elsewhere.'
Canada's 'Human Rights' Tribunals are being used to suppress freedom of expression and, by some professional 'suers', or is it sewers, as an extortion racket. 
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080117/CULTURE/576105764/1015
........................
I don't answer to the state ...
From: EzraILevant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6n3SdV2cwn4
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
Friday, 18 January 2008
CLEARING YOUR HEAD … BY REBOOTING YOUR BRAIN
                                               (PICTURE)
 
( The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday )
It is the same with emotional trauma which we experience constantly to a larger or lesser extent during our lives. Each time the brain responds to the emotional charge it mostly retains that response pattern.

 So we are all carrying old reaction neuron-networks that are the result of old traumas because, while the experience may have passed, the brain’s reaction to that experience is still there.
 
If it was a physical trauma the reaction state may be causing continuing disablement in limbs or elsewhere which could be removed or at least eased if the brain would revert to its pre-reaction state.

 Once again it is the same with emotions. When the brain has reacted to meet an emotional challenge we would be fine if it just returned to its former state when the challenge has been dealt with. But it doesn’t. It associates its reaction to the challenge with surviving the challenge and so it stays that way because that reaction state = survival in its reality.  
The brain’s ‘philosophy’ can be summed up thus: If fighting or running in the face of danger has ensured you have survived a threat then keep fighting and running even though the threat has gone.

 What this means, however, is that these ‘reaction networks’ in the brain go on filtering and observing reality indefinitely and can fundamentally distort the way we see ourselves and our experiences. It is like clouding the lens through which we observe life.
But the brain can be 'rebooted' and these redundant reaction patterns removed.
.....................................................................................................................
 
Friday, 18 January 2008
The Banking Scam
( picture) 
 One woman's story ...
Tom-heneghan  Monday, January 14, 2008 ...  at:
(  Bank of America Are Thieves ) 
 
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 
fw10
 
INTRODUCTION To:
THE BRITISH LEGAL SYSTEM OF
MIXED COMMON AND ROMAN LAW
HAS BEEN USED TO ENSLAVE US(A)
 
PRESENTED IN THIRTEEN PARTS
PRESENTED AND EDITED BY ELDON G. WARMAN
 
Calgary, Alberta, Canada  
http://www.detaxcanada.org/cmlawintro.htm common-law-intro
 
http://www.detaxcanada.org/cmlaw1.htm
Proceed To PART TWO THREE  FOUR  FIVE  SIX  SEVEN  EIGHT  NINE  TEN  ELEVEN  TWELVE  THIRTEEN
 
GoTo: MY OTHER SITE ABOUT
 DETAX CANADA (Home Page)
 
 
 
detaxcanada:
THE MEN AND WOMEN HOLDING
POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY IN
THE HOAX GOVERNMENTS OF CANADA
AND THE IMPOSTOR CROWN OF CANADA
ARE COMMITTING HIGH TREASON
AGAINST THE CANADIAN PEOPLE
Posted: March 1st, 2002
Latest update: Nov 30, 2007
.........................................
Thomas Jefferson wrote in the USA Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
    It is obvious that Jefferson gained his inspiration from:
    Virginia Declaration of Rights (June 12, 1776) Drafted by: George Mason
    Article I: That all men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.
It should be noted here that the primary unalienable (meaning: a value cannot be ascertained) right is 'life'. The secondary unalienable rights are 'property' and 'liberty'. 'Property' is absolutely necessary for the maintenance of life - the maintenance of one's body. 'Liberty' is absolutely necessary to take one's produce to market - to travel to one's place of work where labour, the primary property, may be exchanged for the necessary property to maintain life - food, shelter and clothing.
The 'Pursuit of Happiness' (Hope of Happiness) is vital for one's mental and physical health.
Notice that Jefferson 'conveniently' left the property right out of the Declaration of Independence. Modern charters of rights use the term 'security of person'.
Since 'person' is a legal status (corporate slave status) attached to one's body, the statement is meaningless relative to rights.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
    Article II: That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.
    Article III: That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation or community; of all the various modes and forms of government that is best, which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and that, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
..........................................................................................................................
Conclusion drawn from the above quote:
    1. We, the People are creations of God - NOT creations of government.
    2. The RIGHTS of LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY and the PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS are bestowed upon us by our Creator - NOT by government.
    3. We, the People create government and install kings, queens, prime ministers or presidents as our servant.
    4. As creator of government, we are the "MAJESTY", and government is our servant.
    5. When the men and women, acting as members of a SERVANT government, scheme to overthrow the "MAJESTY" of the MASTER and subjugate or destroy the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, there exists the crime of HIGH TREASON.
    6. The Canadian People have NOT had one iota of opportunity to participate in deciding whether we will have the Monarch of Great Britain as the Crown of Canada, what form of government we will have in Canada, or any opportunity to write or ratify a constitution.
From the 1893 Dictionary of Law:
Treason. Betrayal, treachery, breach of faith or allegiance.
Treason may exist only as between allies: it is a general appellation to denote not only offenses against the king and government, but also accumulation of guilt which arises whenever a superior reposes a confidence in a subject or inferior, between whom and himself there subsists a natural, a civil, or even a spiritual relation, and the inferior so abuses that confidence, so forgets the obligations of duty, subjugation, and allegiance, as to destroy the life of the superior.
When disloyalty attacks majesty itself it is called, by way of distinction, high treason, equivalent to the 'crimen loesoe majestatis' of the Romans.
High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power.
..................................................................................................................................
The Treasonous Acts Against Canadians
The Canadian Governments, at all levels, by use of a "STRAWMAN", a sound alike name of the name by which you have been called all your life, but usually spelled in all capital letters or family name first, and called a "PERSON". The deceit is in the government's (Crown) making the family name as the paramount name, a "surname", where the root word "sur" means over, above, primary, and the given name(s) as a reference name. This is opposite to the intentions of one's parents, and opposite of the origin and status of a "family" name - that being a reference name for the primary, or given names. That fraudulent name is then inscribed on a government money value instrument called a 'birth certificate'. In one's using/acknowledging the birth certificate name as being "one and the same" as oneself, that fraud intended name, it carries with its use, the status of 'plantation slave'.
The 'all caps' spelling is a code signifying that the slave has been pledged as a debtor in the bankruptcy of the Crown. All western nations were declared bankrupt in 1930. The deceit by government in teaching people to use the birth certificate name through the educational system makes all Canadians SUBJECT to the CROWN by changing our status to that of a FEUDAL SERF of the MIDDLE AGES. For several hundred years, the British Monarchy bestowed 'privileges' (falsely called rights) on 'subjects' (sometimes called 'citizens'), but this ceased with the 1930 bankruptcy.
Since that time, these 'privileges', including 'due process of law' has been slowly removed, and the 'slaves' have been subjected to increased forced extraction of their labour and life (life is time spent) by way of taxation and inflation of fiat counterfeit money. This is how people have been deprived of the protections of such documents as the Magna Carta 1225, the Habeas Corpus Act, the Bill of Rights, The Petition of Rights, and more recently, Diefenbaker's Canadian Bill of Rights.
The Romans had an expression for disobedient slaves, called "homo sacer", where the disobedient slave was deprived of all rights of due process of law. The disobedient slave could be murdered at will by "officers of Caesar" without any reprisal, just as modern police can murder people with their guns or tasers without fear of criminal justice, based upon their own testimony of right.
This is a deliberate act of HIGH TREASON against the People of Canada, as it results in the loss of the Creator bestowed rights of LIFE, LIBERTY and PROPERTY, and the right to a common law court (due process of law).
Queen Elizabeth II has allowed her name to be prostituted to this evil scheme in direct violation of her oath of office as Monarch of the British Commonwealth of Nations. In her oath, she swore on the Holy Bible that she would uphold and defend the rights of the People over which she reigns as Monarch.
There is a question as to whether the Monarch of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland has any right to be called the Monarch or the Crown of Canada, as the right to succession in the BNA Act (section 2) granted to the successors and heirs of Queen Victoria was struck by the British Imperial Parliament in 1893.
Any claim of absolute sovereignty rights by the English Monarchy was shown to be non-existent in the Magna Carta of 1215. [Actually 1225, as the 1215 Magna Carta was voided by the Pope.] Yet, over PERSONS, be they natural persons (man under contract of servitude with the Crown, and without right of free will - except for obedience) or artificial corporate bodies, as created by the Crown, there is absolute rights of the MASTER over the servant exhibited by the Crown over the People.
The Crown, whether it be in so-called right of Canada or of a province, by deviously changing our status before their corrupt courts as being corporate members created by the Crown, has deprived us of our lawful courts and plundered our lives which have been expended in labour to obtain the very necessities of life.
In ALL cases in a court in Canada, where Canadians are taken to court for disobedience to a statute, or regulation therein, they are considered a 'CORPORATE ENTITY/NATURAL PERSON/MEMBER'. This fact is an unknown to most Canadians. People believe that they are dealing directly with the Canadian Justice system as a full liability man or woman with full rights.
England has been under the Roman system since King John signed over England FOREVER as a vassal state to the Holy Roman Empire/Pontiff/Vatican in 1213. All human institutions are make-believe ships/incorporations in the Roman system. Thus, All corporations and corporate (crew)members are a legal fiction, and are SUBJECTS of the Crown. The British Crown is subject to, or under the Crown of the City of London, the Vatican owned financial, legal and professional controls capitol of the Holy Roman Empire. So, the Crown referred to in Canada is most likely the 6 pointed City of London Crown (a corporation), not the British Crown. The Canadian people have a basic RIGHT to Common Law , and as such, are NOT SUBJECTS of the Crown for the imposition of corporate ADMINISTRATIVE Law - the ONLY type of law which is found in the Canadian Court system. This subterfuge is totally in the realm of legal sleaze and trickery for the purpose of denying your God Given RIGHTS.
In using the term "Common Law", I refer to the Anglo-Saxon Common Law. The English Monarchy began the defrauding of the English people of their individual rights protecting Anglo-Saxon Common Law in a concerted effort by King Edward I in conspiracy with the Pope of Rome sometime around 1300 AD. The term "common law" and "English common law" was concocted as a fraud; and, is in fact, a system derived directly from Roman civil law - commonly called "dictator's law". As Roman Municipal Law, it points to Mercantile Law used against debtors, as 'municipal' means a debtor territory. Considering that Anglo-Saxon Common Law period of England preceded the Norman Conquest of England by some 500 years, we have evidence of this fraud posted on the Canadian Federal Justice website:
    "The common law, which developed in Great Britain after the Norman Conquest, was based on the decisions of judges in the royal courts. It is called judge-made law because it is a system of rules based on "precedent". Whenever a judge makes a decision that is to be legally enforced, this decision becomes a precedent: a rule that will guide judges in making subsequent decisions in similar cases. The common law is unique in the world because it cannot be found in any "code" or "legislation"; it exists only in past decisions. However, this also makes it flexible and adaptable to changing circumstances."
The primary feature of Roman Municipal Law, a variation of Roman Civil Law, [derived from Maritime Law], used by the deceitful English Monarchy, and it's so-called justice system, was/is the "notwithstanding clause". The Monarchy called this 'Equity'. This clause derives from the fact that Roman Law is based upon all commercial and political organizations, in fact all human institutions, being make-believe ships.
All 'ship's orders' - laws, rules and regulations concerning the ship, have within them the necessary right and duty of the captain to disregard any such rules or regulations when he deems it necessary for the 'good' of the ship. The complete "flexible and adaptable" feature of so-called English or British common law is nothing more than the common usage of the notwithstanding clause to insure that the Crown's pleasures, prerogatives and privileges come before the individual rights of the people.
Thomas Paine (1737-1809), the great American philosopher of man's individual rights and freedoms, wrote in his book Rights Of Man (page 218): "Government by precedent, without any regard to the principle of the precedent, is one of the vilest systems that can be set up." In Paine's day, government's primary reason for existence was the justice system.
We can see how "flexible and adaptable" this fraudulent English common law is by the way Canadian and American judges use the Anti-Government Movement Guide Book to institute treasonous actions against Canadians (and Americans, as the case may be) when people use unalienable rights or statute and/or constitutional law to defend themselves against government extortion rackets.
    So, What is my understanding regarding the nature of Anglo-Saxon Common Law?
    The Anglo-Saxon Law had no Statutes, Acts, Rules, Regulations, Edicts, Precedents or Magistrates[Judges]. There was only ONE Law - "Do not unto others as you would not have others do unto you." A sheriff was administrator for keeping the peace, and jury assembly. He was then enforcer of jury decisions. The jury was selected from the community of other free will men [peers = equal in status]. The jury decided whether the accused, [or the accuser] was using his/her free will in a moral manner, basing their decision solely on the Golden Rule - God's Law. The assembled jury appointed a foreman as the speaker and administrator.
As the above quote from the 1893 Dictionary of Law states: "High treason is the most heinous civil crime a man can commit. If indeterminate, this alone is sufficient to make a government degenerate into arbitrary power."
Government, bodies politic, are corporations wherein men in administrative positions supposedly have protection against the actions they do by the "corporate veil". All corporations are "make-believe" ships, based upon the Roman Empire system, which itself was based upon the ancient Persian model whereby the ship was the entity, and the men on board as crewmembers were non-volitional (non-free-will minded) body parts with only the duty to obey the captain's orders.
But, this make-believe corporate veil protection to do as they please is only a fictional game. Men (and women) who do damage to another while in a contract (oath of office) to be a servant to the People are full liable for their unlawful actions when it entails HIGH TREASON. The PENALTY for HIGH TREASON is DEATH BY HANGING - and that penalty is still in effect in Canada.
In the USA Supreme Court records, we find:
TREASON:
Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.
U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980);
Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
...........................................................................................................................
What's To Be Done??
    I would suggest reading a Discourse on Voluntary Servitude
    written by Éttiene de la Boétie of France around 1560.
    To learn about legal rights of which you should become
    very aware, study: Tyranny
    My primary answer is the Magna Carta Kanata Project.
     
     
    Eldon G. Warman
    ++++++++++++++++++++++
    (See #2 attachment at the bottom of this article)
    Learn the facts about the Vatican's and British Crown's continued claimed ownership of the USA; and, their continued collection of 'tribute' from Americans through the Pope's 'Holy Roman Empire'.
    Read about this here.
    (See #3 attachment at the bottom of this article)
    Additional, and VERY IMPORTANT information on this topic is available through LINKS at the end of PART THIRTEEN.
    ...................................................................................................
     
    Some of the writers of the Constitution thought it was a little too restrictive. It was generally conceded, for instance, that the people had the right to bear arms, but they also knew that if we ever were placed or allowed ourselves to be brought under Maritime Admiralty Law concerning our persons and property, we would have dire need of a guarantee for our rights -- thus, the ten amendments were added to the Constitution, and that became the substantive part of the Constitution. Article III, Section 2, of the Constitution defines the Maritime Admiralty jurisdiction.
    How have we been tricked out of our Common Law rights; and, into the Admiralty courts? How has equity as well as Admiralty been corrupted? How has the Federal Government made it almost impossible for us to receive our constitutional rights -- our substantive rights in the Constitution?
    Now, to understand the Constitution -- we must examine the Declaration of Independence and those 56 men who signed it, and pledged their lives, liberty, family, property, and their honor to this sacred trust. All of these men were very knowledgeable and learned in the Common Law -- they knew the law because they studied the law, they may not have had a high school education (many of them). But they could read, and they read and studied law. They were men of the age of reason and they knew and they understood. They knew exactly what the king was doing. They knew the law.
    Knowledge is a very important thing. And, as James Madison wrote years ago: "Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." Education should never be terminal! The First Amendment to the US Constitution cites "Freedom of Religion" that in actual fact is "Freedom of Education" since the church controlled education, at the time of its writing.
    Now, there is a chronological sequence of events that placed us where we are today. We can almost assure you that you will reject, or want to reject, parts of what you are about to see and hear. There is a theory known as the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (TCD) that holds that the mind involuntarily rejects information not in line with previous thoughts and/or actions. Brace yourself, the following message may be entirely different from anything you heretofore believed to be true. If you are unaware, you are unaware of being unaware!
    Proceed to PART TWO  THREE  FOUR  FIVE  SIX  SEVEN  EIGHT  NINE  TEN  ELEVEN  TWELVE  THIRTEEN  Any Questions? cmlaw1.htm
     
    PART 1:
    Have You Been Hornswoggled?
    About the author: Richard McDonald is a California Citizen domiciled in The California state Republic. He does legal research and has his own site on the web, The Citizens Forum File area. hornswog.htm
     
     
    PART 2:
    DETAXCANADA
     
    PART 3:
    An Expose'
    THE UNITED STATES
    IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
    EXTORTING TAXES FOR THE CROWN!
     
     
     
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
     
    another s-letter
     
    Comments On "Hoover Planned Massive Arrests"
    (...)   The Hoover agenda is but a glimpse and fractal of an overall and much greater “Plan”, to be implemented over a long-period of time over multiple generations of the People of the planet and the nations thereof.  Titles 26 and 18 are judicially implemented through Title 28;  the Federal Magistrate Act is key, as well, because it is usually a Federal Magistrate, having only the ‘law authority’ of a federal park ranger [who can deal with only infractions of violations of federal law on federal lands legally owned and/or ceded to the “United States”], that is enjoined to contract on charging instruments, ie. Affidavits of Cause and  Application for Search Warrant, tendered [commercial term] by real men acting as ’agents’ of/for the fiction ‘government’  to make, grant, and issue Search Warrants, which are then to be delivered [commercial term] or ‘served’ [legal term] on the target property.  The same is true of Arrest Warrants.  All are brought against ‘citizens of the United States’ when involving anyone within the continental limit of the 48 states of the United States of America who was born on the land of one of said states.  As a matter of law and jurisdiction, said ‘states’ are deemed to be distinct, diverse, and outside the territorial [jurisdiction] limits of the federal United States, ie. District of Columbia, and are not federal territories under exclusive territorial legislative control [regulation] of Congress or the Executive.
    The above attachments are taken from a recent [2007] Supreme Court case, filed on behalf of a number of federal inmates, who’s federal judgments and incarcerations are all brought under alleged authority of the Constitution and the federal Statutes at Title 18.  Conclusive research had been done over a period of six years by those who were instrumental in bringing the subject matter of the action forward.   Their conclusions are verified and certified by the Clerk of the National Archive and Clerk of Congress, and fully establish that Title 18 was never lawfully enacted on June 25, 1948, which also implies that Titles 3, 28, and the Federal Magistrate Act were not as well.  The certified Archive documents of the legislative proceedings were included in this action for certain relief.  The Supreme Court just recently ‘denied’ the action, refusing to hear the case, and dismissed it, without any written findings of fact or conclusions of law, which is at the ‘discretion’ of the court not to do so.  The case may be dead, but the subject matter is not.
    The conversion of the  lawful American people of the several republic states, being ‘non-resident aliens’ to the District of Columbia, into corporate ‘citizens of the United States’, within the District of Columbia, as ‘U.S. persons’ or ‘personnel’, ‘res idents of the United States’, who then become corporate FRANCHISE TRUST ‘taxpayers’, deemed to be engaged in an excise taxable privileged [regulated] activity of a ‘trade or business’ in the “performance of a public office or official duty’ is what Title 5 was in-part intended to lay the groundwork for.  Americans had to be converted and reclassified under regime of “law authority”, to be brought under or harnessed under the emerging regime of administrative [socialist-fascist] ‘law’, which itself was/is brought about by the declared emergency of 1933 and subsequent Executive, Legislative, and Judicial measures in support thereof.
    What is also of subtle significance as related to the “Plan” and the architects of it, who act through U.S. hegemony and superiority as the last ‘super power’, is the recent passing of the Military Commissions Act:  See below and take note that the Bill # is 6166, the same number as the draconian E.O. 6166, June 10, 1933:
     H R 6166      RECORDED VOTE      27-Sep-2006      4:45 PM
     QUESTION:  On Passage
     BILL TITLE: Military Commissions Act
     
    A friend of mine who is a Biblical researcher shared some recently disclosed information originating with some Biblical scholars recently reporting to the effect that the ‘number of the BEAST’ was/is not in fact “666”, but was wrongly mis-interpreted and is in fact “6166”.  
    E.O. 6166 is the actual [military-executive] Order which created the current fascist STATE.  And, House Resolution (HR) 6166 is the Act that redefines and expands the presumed ‘law authority’ of the fascists, and reiterates E.O. 6166 of June 10, 1933..
    Other pending ‘legislation’, if passed, will put the perverbial ‘nail’ in the coffin of the People and the Republic.  Both E.O. 6166 and HR 6166 go to Senate Document 43, 1933 and HJR-192 of June 5, 1933, now rescinded, but still acting under full force and effect as “public policy” and “public interest” within the “PUBLIC TRUST”.
    In order for any legislative act of Congress to bear on any real man or woman of  any American state, ‘they’ had to first convert the People of the states into legislatively controlled and fictionalized ‘persons’ having the same status as a COMMERCIAL FRANCHISE or corporation under presumed exclusive jurisdiction and authority of  U.S. municipal-territorial commutarian contract “law” [in admiralty-maritime venue].  Hence, the bankruptcy of 1933 was not a move to subjugate and usurp the alleged ‘states’ of the Union Republic, but to subjugate by inducement, misrepresentation, extreme duress, and obfuscation of material facts,  the American People, who’s energy and capacity was needed for all kinds of nefarious purposes besides ‘payment of the public debt.  It was a concerted programmatic move to usurp the status and standing of the People under the Laws of Nature and God, on the Land, and to circumvent and controvert any of their Rights under the BILL OF RIGHTS, within the organic Constitution for the united States of America.  All of this still operating under force of occupation, known as the “FEDERAL CORPORATION”, sited in the District of Columbia, which itself is controlled fully by private foreign and domestic principals.(...)
     
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++