----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: Today's Post " Stop Paying
Taxes Legally" (This Video has been deleted from Fourwinds)
Please read my blog on the Name Game, and
logic on how people are being forced to comply with the income
(Title 26 USC) or face fines, imprisonment and confiscation of
The NAME GAME Explained
Recent research here in Canada shows that
income tax, and all other statutory law, is imposed based upon
'property right', and that property right is the property right
corporate Crown in Canada, and corporate State (be it a State or
UNITED STATES) in the USA.
The same scheme can be found in any
country that is
a subject country of the Pontiff of Rome's Holy Roman Empire.
actuality, the assumed 'property right' is that of the corporate
Roman Empire, as the Crown or incorporated State is an agency for
Holy Roman Empire.
The 'Crown' is the administrative
the Pontiff of Rome owned City of London, the financial, legal
professional standards capitol of/for the Vatican, The City of
is a square mile area within Greater London, England, and is an
In the USA, the administrative
corporation for the
Pontiff of Rome is the UNITED STATES, and that corporation administers
the Vatican capitol, for, primarily, military purposes, called
Columbia, or the District of Columbia. The UNITED STATES also
administers the 50 sub-corporate States of the United States of
America, identified with the 2 cap letters- CA, OR, WA, etc.
All adult humans are deceived into using
fiction name, as imprinted on the copy of the birth certificate
receive when ordering it from Provincial/State Vital Statistics,
whatever source you apply. Although the birth certificate is of
somewhat recent origin and used to formally offer 'citizens' as
chattel in bankruptcy to the Pope's Holy Roman Empire owned
Rothschilds' Banking System, the false use of the family name
back into the Middle Ages in England. Thus, it is with the family name
made a primary, or surname, (example - Mister Jones), and
names of the child (example - Peter) made a reference name to the
primary name. This is the reverse or mirror image to reality. A
'family name' is NOT a man's name - it is a name of a clan - a blood
relationship. [Replace the example names with your given and
We are then 'forced' or 'obliged' to use
in all commercial and Government dealings and communications. So,
we do use it, as 99.99% of the human inhabitants of North America
most of the world) do, we supposedly 'voluntarily' attach
the free will adult human, to the Crown/State owned property, called
the 'legal identity name' as an accessory attached to property owned by
The Crown/State then invokes the legal
accessio cedit principali, [an accessory attached to a principal
becomes the property of the owner of the principal], where the
principal is the legal identity name as 'intellectual property', the
owner is the corporation called the Crown/State or UNITED STATES, and
the accessory is the free will human who has supposedly volunteered
himself to be 'property by attachment' of the Crown/State. An adult
human who is property is, and by any other name, a 'slave', be it
citizen, subject or freeman.
I would point out here that all concepts
that the relationship between free will man and Government/corporate
bodies is contractual are incorrect. All supposed remedies in contract
law, American UCC or Canadian PPSA are 'red herring' diversions - some
intended, and some in ignorance by the teachers.
As a slave, one's property in possession,
body and labor, belongs to the slave owner 100%. And, the property
right is a bundle of rights - own, use, sell, gift, bequeath and
Thus, ALL 'income' resulting from the
slave's mental and/or physical labor belongs to the slave owner. That
which is left with or granted to the slave for his own use and
maintenance is called a 'benefit'. In Canada, the 'return of income'
[the phrase itself tells the story] is called a T1 'tax and benefits
package'. The T1 or 1040 is an accounting by the slave of his fruits of
labor that belongs to the slave owner, and the prescribed 'benefits'
that he may keep or have back from withholding.
Thus, all income tax cases', in reality,
from fraud, illegal concealment and theft by the accused slave of the
slave owner's 'property'.
Going back to an above paragraph, we find
attachment of oneself to the Crown/State owned name is 'assumed to be
voluntary', as the Crown/State has no valid right to impose slavery
upon adult humans against their will. And, constitutional prohibitions
of slavery only encompasses ' involuntary servitude', not 'voluntary
servitude'. Anyone working as an employee is in a contract of voluntary
servitude - direction and time control by, and obedience and loyalty to
the employer. Until we 'assumed to be slaves' get our heads around this
key to the lock that holds our chains of slavery around our necks and
ankles, we will continue to attempt to swim with that 100 lb ball
chained to our leg.
Reports of unsuccessful attempts at
government imposed debts using the Canadian Bills of Exchange Act or US
UCC provisions of settling an account proved that there was no contract
issue between a Canadian or American adult human and the Government as
is commonly taught by some patriot gurus.Under contract, a 'bill' is a
method of equalizing a contract - like value exchanged for like value.
However, under the 'property right' of a slave owner in regard to
property in the possession of an owned slave, a 'demand' for the
property by the slave owner, or the slave
owner's agent (such as the IRS, or county
collector, or for a court imposed fine),is all that is necessary,
without regard to due process of law. Remember, ALL that a slave
possesses belongs to the slave owner. I am NOT saying you ARE a slave.
I just point out to you that Government, and its employees, judges and
officers SEE you as a SLAVE.
Further, when any 'officer' of the
be it 'peace officer or police', all the way to King or President
choose to declare someone 'homo sacer' (meaning a man who has been
stripped of his status of 'person' - that being an obedient corporate
slave member of the corporate body politic) - he is stripped of the
rights of due process of law, and can be fined, punished, tortured or
killed without repercussion to the officer, or officer involved. This
happens all the time in the world of the Holy Roman Empire.
"In no trial or hearing under this act
testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence; and the
certificates in this and the first [fourth] section mentioned, shall be
conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor
granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Territory from which
he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons
by any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person
Three major points here: 1. The accused
slave cannot enter evidence in his own defense. Sound familiar? The
Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and German 'Holocaust Denial' litigation
courts declare that "truth is no defense". Judges constantly
offered defenses by Government accused defendants, especially in
traffic and income tax issues. And, this may be acceptable if the judge
were to explain why he need do that, but almost 100% of the time, no
explanation is offered, and that is to hide the 'homo sacer' doctrine,
and the fact that a slave is being tried for disobedience to the rules
within the slave owner's property right.
2. The 'certificate' presented by the
agent of the property owner (declaration of property ownership) is
sufficient for conviction of disobedience.
3. No molestation (such as criminal or
complaints) can be made by, or on behalf of the accused or convicted
disobedient slave. Anyone know of successful
litigation against a police officer or
severely abused the unalienable rights of a man? Yes, there may be a
few in well publicized cases, where the system has to hide their
despotic Roman scheme, but that is rare.
A POSSIBLE REMEDY
However, since we are 'forced to', or
use the Crown/State owned legal identity name in all commercial and
government dealings, services and communications, we can make a 'claim
of right' under the Rule of Private Necessity - with the necessity
being the means to sustain and maintain our life, as all food, shelter,
clothing, means of travel and that which answers our need for happiness
all has to be obtained or used in the realms of commerce. Briefly,
commerce is all communications, contracts, and other interrelations and
interactions with other parties, which includes government.
This should counter the claim that we
attach ourselves to Crown/State property. Repeating - The Private
Necessity is that we cannot do anything in relation to life, liberty,
property or due process of law without using the Crown/State owned
name, and thus we cannot sustain or maintain our lives without that
The name separation is only a court
tactic, as the
legal identity name is always the one charged. The Government intent,
of course, is to get to the adult man (m or f) attached to that name -
the attached accessory - you. Otherwise you, and your children
'use' that legal identity name in all commerce (communication), and you
do so under private necessity. So, only in court do you need to prove:
1. That you are a separate party from the
2. That you only use the legal identity
as defendant, under private necessity to sustain and maintain your
life, and that you are not voluntarily attached to it permanently as an
accessory to Crown property.
3. That you have Her Majesty's permission
that Crown owned legal name according to Vital Statistics Acts of the
4. That the copy of the birth certificate
myself has been surrendered to the Court, and I deny any fiduciary
responsibility for that Crown property or the name thereon. [Should
have been previously surrendered, along with the Canada affidavit, to a
judge in chambers hearing.]
5. It all comes right down to this:
consent'. You do not have to consent to identified as being the name
found on the birth certificate. "I do not authorize you to recognize me
as being one and the same as the legal identity name you find on your
documents. I do not consent to that."
Also, a Freedom Of Information Demand
sent to the Minister, or Representativerequesting the authority, date,
means and methods by which you, a free will man (m or f) became a slave
owned by the corporate Crown or State.
A process that has worked recently in
Texas is the
'surrender' of the copy of the birth certificate one has in possession
to a judge, or the judge assigned to a case where you, in the legal
identity name, are the defendant, in an 'in chambers' hearing. Some
call this 'surrender' of the defendant (the legal identity name) as
being on the 'private side' using the Biblical method of settling
disputes privately if possible.
This is preferred to 'surrendering it in
that is on the 'public side', and as a human presence in the
room, the assumption that you are an attachmentto the legal identity
name has already been made. And being attached as an accessory
to it, you become surety, guarantor and
do 'represent' the legal identity name defendant.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Addendum 1 Name Game
I don't promote or use the Commercial
Redemption system. I just suggest showing the
'authorities" that I, and the 'legal
identity name' are not one and the same party.
The Statement of Live Birth and the Birth
Certificate can be used as proof of that,
since, as a child, you had nothing to do
with the registration of your birth, nor
with the choice of names you were to be
called as a child.
1. The Birth Certificate shows that it
belongs to the State/Province where you were
born, and thus, is the property of the
State or Crown in right of the Province.
2. The name on that shows your family
name to be the primary name of the 'legal i
dentity name' - a 'surname', and the
first and second names being referential to
it. That is fiction. The family name is a
clan name. It is not the name of an
individual man (m or f).
3. The Statement of Birth shows that the
first and second name is a gift (given names),
and as such is a contract. An infant
(under age 21) cannot be party to a contract.
An acceptor of a gift must 'accept', and
accept voluntarily. Thus, you have never
'accepted' the given names. There is no
mechanism to do that in the Roman Law we
are under. The Roman law only sees the
legal identity name, a name that belongs
to the corporate Roman Empire of the Pope.
4. An adult man is actually a mind
inhabiting a physical human body. Only things
can be named. A mind is a process, not a
Thus, when a human becomes an adult, that
is akin to the launching of a new ship.
The adult mind is equivalent to the
captain of a ship at sea. The captain is sovereign
or supreme on his ship. The only way a
captain of a ship can lose that sovereignty
is by putting his ship 'in tow'
voluntarily behind another ship. It is then that
the tow ship captain gains sovereignty
over the captain of the ship in tow.
The legal identity name is the rope that
ties our vessel to the corporate Crown of
the City of London (owned by the
corporate Holy Roman Empire).
The Name Game Blog explains the rest.
Addendum 2 Name Game
The name "they" use on all their
documents, including indictments, is the legal
name. I believe there is no argument with
that. In fact, the courts are usually
ready to agree with that classification
By presenting the Statement of Birth
(SOB) to them and asking them to do an
investigation with a view to answering
just two simple questions, will repel all
attacks from the "system". The two
1. Who has secured the rights (legal and
equitable) in the legal name??? (insert
name exactly as it appears on the Birth
Certificate even though the all caps aspect
is a red herring); and,
2. What rights do I have in the legal
The answers to these two questions will
prove (in Ontario SOB's are admissible
in any Ontario court as Proof, not just
evidence, of the facts so certified) that
1. the government secured the rights
(a.k.a. the secured party) in the legal name
and, therefore, I have no rights in the
legal name. 2. If I have no rights in the
legal name, then how can I have any
obligations related to the legal name?
The party that the law holds legally
responsible for the financial and other
obligations of the property (legal name)
is the secured party, which is the
government in the case of the legal name.
This is all proven by the SOB!
It would seem to me that there is no
place for the system to go once this truth
is on the table. Certainly CRA can be
easily defeated with this approach.
However, the judge may make the
assumption that by your 'permanent' use of the
legal identity name, you have become an
accessory attached to that Crown owned
name, and thus you are the property of
the Crown by the legal maxim, which
arises out of the property right,
accessio cedit principali. Thus, to complete
the above procedure, you must, by
affidavit or notice, make a claim of right
of free will status and claim that the
Crown owned name is used by permission
of Her Majesty and used under private
necessity in commerce to sustain and
maintain your life. As such, your use of
the Crown owned name is not a voluntary
act by yourself. End of blog
For those people who get a demand to
file, they can safely use my filing method:
Since one never again 'owes taxes' using
my method, no one need file unless
demanded to do so by the IRS or
CRA(Canada). That rule is in both the Canadian
Income Tax Act and Title 26 USC. Of
course, if people wish to try to get back
withheld (wages) taxes, they must file.