InfoChrono20080729a

http://impeachforpeace.org/impeach_bush_blog/wp-content/uploads/
2007/08/051206impeach-bush-poster2.jpg

Call HOUSE JUDICIARY to vote IMPEACHMENT ARTICLES onto House floor
(Hold Mr. Bush & Congress accountable)

If House Judiciary Committee (by simple one-vote majority) votes one of 35 articles of impeachment onto the House floor, the entire House must vote on the article(s). If the full House (by a simple one-vote majority) approves one article(s), President Bush is formally impeached (indicted) and required to stand trial before a vote in the Senate to immediately remove him from office (conviction).

202-225-3951—Dem. Judiciary Office / 202-225-6906—Repub. Judiciary Office

202-225-4965 / 202-225-0100—House Speaker Nancy Pelosi

202-225-5126—Dem. House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers

http://bush-hitler.com/Graphics/Liberty.jpg
http://www.ushistory.org/brandywine/images/sold06.gif

Lafayette remains at Brandywine and Albert Gore Jr. remains the REAL president of the United States .

Non-inaugurated, duly elected
President Albert Gore Jr.,
http://www.linktv.org/sitecontent/seriesthumbs/algorespeech2.jpg

TOM HENEGHAN'S EXPLOSIVE INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
International Intelligence Expert, Tom Heneghan, has hundreds of highly credible sources inside American and European Intelligence Agencies and INTERPOL -- reporting what is REALLY going on behind the scenes of the controlled mainstream media cover up propaganda of on-going massive deceptions and illusions.

EVER VIGILANT 24/7
http://foreignerinformosa.typepad.com/the_foreigner_in_formosa/images/
2007/07/22/commando_squirrel.jpg

NOTICE: Occasionally the Bush-Clinton Crime Family Syndicate controlled NSA and FBI Division 5 and/or Israeli Mossad, invade this intelligence blog changing or removing images, pictures and phraseology and even disconnect the link from the internet for the purpose of trying to keep you, the American People, ill-informed.

Make special note of the pics and images they remove off these intelligence briefings and/or are scrubbing off the internet.

Must Read on Cell PHone Hazard

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America is dead, says Robert A. Pastor, the American University professor who for more than a decade has been a major proponent of building a North American Community.

"The new president will probably discard the SPP," Pastor wrote in an article titled "The Future of North America," published in the current July/August issue of the Council on Foreign Relations magazine Foreign Affairs.

The SPP, which critics contend is a step toward a North American Union, is an agreement to increase cooperation on security and economic issues signed by the leaders of the U.S., Mexico and Canada in 2005. Despite having no authorization from Congress, the Bush administration launched extensive working-group activity to implement the agreement. The working groups – ranging from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration – have counterparts in Mexico and Canada.

"The April summit meeting was probably the last hurrah for the SPP," Pastor wrote, referring to the fourth annual SPP meeting held in April in New Orleans.

Pastor attributes the failure of SPP to its largely bureaucratic nature and the decision policy makers made to keep SPP largely below the radar of public opinion.

"The strategy of acting on technical issues in an incremental, bureaucratic way and keeping the issues away from public view has generated more suspicion than accomplishments," Pastor admitted.

Pastor blames critics for the failure of the SPP, charging it has come under attack from both ends of the political spectrum.

"From the right have come attacks based on cultural anxieties of being overrun by Mexican immigrants and fears that cooperation with Canada and Mexico could lead down a slippery slope toward a North American Union," he wrote. "From the left came attacks based on economic fears of jobs lost due to unfair trading practices."

"These two sets of fears came together in a perfect storm that was pushed forward by a surplus of hot air from talk-show hosts on radio and television," he continued. "In the face of this criticism, the Bush administration was silent, and the Democratic candidates competed for votes in the rust-belt states, where unions and many working people have come to see NAFTA and globalization much as (commentator Lou) Dobbs does."

"Dobbs, among others, viewed a report by a 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force (which I chaired), 'Building a North American Community,' as the manifesto of a conspiracy to subvert American sovereignty," he asserted. "Dobbs claimed that the CFR study proposed a North American Union, although it did not."

Pastor has argued consistently for a "North American Community," as suggested by the title of his 2001 book entitled "Toward a North American Community."

Pastor argued the two were different in that North American Community would involve "three sovereign governments that seek to strengthen bonds of cooperation."

Noting that the European Community was a transitional state between the European Common Market and the European Union, Pastor conceded to WND that, "I don't think a political union of North America is an inherently bad idea, nor do I think it is a good idea for right now."

Despite the SPP setback, Pastor remains determined to advise a different approach to his continued goal of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a North American Community.

"The three heads of state must also commit to building a new consciousness, a new way of thinking about one's neighbors and about the continental agenda," he said. "Americans, Canadians and Mexicans can be nationals and North Americans at the same time."

To correct the defects of the SPP bureaucratic closed-door process, Pastor's CFR article recommended creating new North American institutions, including a North American Investment Fund of at least $20 billion a year "to connect central and southern Mexico to the United States with roads, ports, and communications."

In his CFR article, Pastor also called for the continuation of annual North American heads-of-state summits and the appointment in the next administration of a national adviser for North American affairs, who would chair a cabinet-level committee to formulate a comprehensive plan for North America.

Pastor also encouraged creating a dozen university centers for North American studies "to educate a new generation of students to think North American."

WND reported on the fourth annual North American Model Parliament held this year in Montreal, Canada, for 100 university students from the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

The North American Model Parliament is sponsored by the North American Forum on Integration, on which Pastor serves as a board member.

................................................................................

Tom Bearden

...just lay an ordinary permanent magnet on the table. On top of it, lay an electret so that the E-field of the electret is at right angles to the H-field of the magnet. Costs $2, perhaps takes a minute or two. Then just leave it alone, and don't let anything change it.

You see, that "windmill" system we now need is a priori an "asymmetric" system. And eerily, by their own highly mutilated model, our electrical engineers are totally prohibited from building such asymmetric systems, even though asymmetric systems occur in Maxwell's actual theory. Our EEs have been deliberately conditioned to only build symmetrical systems since the very birth of electrical engineering itself.

Quoting Tesla: “Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].

Here's how he stated it when speaking to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, in 1891:

"Ere many generations pass, our machinery will be driven by a power obtainable at any point in the universe. This idea is not novel... We find it in the delightful myth of Antheus, who derives power from the earth; we find it among the subtle speculations of one of your splendid mathematicians...Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic? If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic – and this we know it is, for certain – then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature." [Nikola Tesla, in a speech in New York to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 1891. Quoted from back cover of his biography, Margaret Cheney, Tesla: Man Out of Time].

Was Tesla "nuts" or had he really discovered how to freely extract EM energy from the local active medium? In other words, had he uncovered asymmetric circuits that allowed this to be done? (...)

By destroying J. P. Morgan's (and Edison's) dreams of a vast DC power plant empire, Tesla had incurred the undying hostility of Morgan, who was a ruthless empire-builder. Morgan recognized Tesla as his mortal enemy, and he set up procedures that destroyed Tesla. Morgan also destroyed Westinghouse, Tesla's backer.

But Morgan was also concerned about this new-fangled "electrical engineering" that was to be set up. So he called in his scientific advisors, and demanded to know if that Heaviside model contained any of those confounded Tesla "energy from the active medium" systems. (..)

[For who did what and who took credit for it, see particularly J. D. Jackson and L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p. 663-680. Discusses roots and history of gauge invariance, verifies that Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with the “t”) as being first.] (...)

In 1892, Lorentz simply appropriated some work already done by Lorenz (without the "t") and symmetrized the Heaviside equations, taking credit for it himself. That meant that Lorentz deliberately and arbitrarily discarded all remaining Maxwellian asymmetric systems -- from the equations that a little later were used for the electrical engineering model itself.

Oops! There went all the original Maxwellian EM energy flow "windmill" systems! They were all deliberately discarded by Lorentz, at the elicitation of Morgan in order to prevent teaching any theory that made possible those confounded Tesla "energy freely from the active medium" systems.

That mutilated Heaviside-Lorentz model is what was then adopted as the model to be used by the new "electrical engineering" just being formed and to be taught in the universities worldwide. And that mutilated model is still what is sadly being taught in all electrical engineering departments in all our universities worldwide.

And all the proper "EM energy windmill" systems were already totally excluded from that EE model. Since its very inception, electrical engineering has thought, designed, built, and deployed only symmetrical Maxwellian systems -- none of which can freely extract and use excess free EM energy from the local environment. Indeed, the symmetrizing of their EE model was deliberately done so that all future young electrical engineers would never think, design, build, and deploy free EM energy "windmill" systems a la Tesla's energy from the active medium discoveries.

So since 1892, none of our electrical engineers has ever dealt with a single asymmetrical Maxwellian system. And none do so today.

Eerily, that is the reason -- and the total reason -- for the present world energy crisis, our dependence on fuel and big nuclear power etc. -- and for electrical engineers not even being taught what actually powers every electrical circuit.

It ISN"T cranking the shaft of the generator! All that cranking the generator shaft does is continually restore the internal source dipole of the generator, that the silly EE symmetrical circuit keeps deliberately destroying faster than it uses some of the free EM energy -- freely extracted from the local vacuum by the proven broken symmetry of that source dipole formed inside the generator -- to power its loads.

Our engineers are, and always have been, trained to build systems which (1) use their internal source dipole's asymmetry to extract the free flow of EM energy from the vacuum, which then pours out of the generator terminals and through space along the external conductors. If the circuits and systems were ASYMMETRIC and just left the source dipole alone once it was formed, it would not be destroyed once made. Then we would not have to crank the shaft of the generator at all, once the dipole was made at the beginning. Then all such asymmetrical circuits would exhibit COP>1.0, and -- with addition of clamped positive feedback -- they would be self-powered by energy already freely extracted directly from the seething virtual state vacuum (by the broken symmetry of that source dipole that is now being preserved).

................

Note that the discovery of modern broken symmetry, predicted by Lee and Yang, was a great revolution in physics. With Lee and Yang's startling prediction, the major experimental physicists leaped on it immediately, and Wu and her colleagues proved it experimentally in Feb. 1957. So dramatic a physics revolution was this, that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang in the same year, in Dec. 1957. (...)

So every EM system and circuit ever built is already powered by energy taken directly from the seething modern vacuum. If we would just let the formed internal source dipole alone and not continually destroy it, we would never have to input any more mechanical shaft energy, once the source dipole had been formed.

Our input of energy is necessary only because we very stupidly build only symmetrical EM circuits, which continually destroy their own source dipolarity (cutting off the free extraction of EM energy from the vacuum) faster than they use a bit of that free energy to power the loads.

As Nobelist Lee remarks, when we have a broken symmetry, then something virtual has become observable. Every source charge is actually a part of a dipolarity when its polarized modern vacuum is considered.

....................

In Conclusion

It is tragic and ironic. In this universe, God has given us unlimited free EM energy pouring forth continuously from every charge and dipole in the universe. We continue to use a sadly mutilated "half theory" to deal with this EM energy, and we deliberately continue to teach packs of known lies in our EE classes worldwide. Specifically, we teach all our electrical engineers to only build symmetrical systems that will destroy their collection of energy from the vacuum faster than they use part of it to power our loads.

We have had group theory (necessary to deal with symmetry and asymmetry) in our universities since 1870. Morgan's scientific advisors circa 1890-91 had no difficulty in doing a group symmetry analysis of the Heaviside equations, being set up for use in a new endeavor to be called "electrical engineering". And they easily found that those equations -- while being severe truncations of Maxwell's actual theory -- still contained some of those undesired "asymmetrical Maxwellian systems" that Tesla had uncovered, so that he was hell-bent on giving the world cheap, clean, free energy. Quoting Tesla:

“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world's machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels." [Nikola Tesla].

“We have to evolve means for obtaining energy from stores which are forever inexhaustible, to perfect methods which do not imply consumption and waste of any material whatever. I now feel sure that the realization of that idea is not far off. ...the possibilities of the development I refer to, namely, that of the operation of engines on any point of the earth by the energy of the medium...” [Nikola Tesla, during an address in 1897 commemorating his installation of generators at Niagara Falls.].

"Whatever our resources of primary energy may be in the future, we must, to be rational, obtain it without consumption of any material." [Nikola Tesla, 1900].

Tesla gave us AC power, the rotating magnetic field that makes modern generators possible, radio, and many other things. His training was in physics of his day, not just what we would call "electrical engineering". Here's what Tesla had to say about the present electrical engineering model -- the Heaviside/Hertz/Gibbs mutilation of Maxwell's theory (which theory was actually 20 quaternion-like equations in 20 unknowns):

"The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history." [Nikola Tesla, "The True Wireless,” Electrical Experimenter, May 1919.]

And this "crippled Hertz theory" itself, contained in the Heaviside equations, was deliberately further curtailed by Lorentz, just before the birth of electrical engineering, in 1892 and at the bidding of a ruthless J. P. Morgan who intended that we continue to have to consume fuel and material to get most of our energy (because of our stupid symmetrical electrical power systems).

Ironically, this has led to a most amazing but absolutely true fact, presently not recognized at all by our scientific community. Quoting:

“This has led to one of the greatest ironies in history: All the hydrocarbons ever burned, all the steam turbines that ever turned the shaft of a generator, all the rivers ever dammed, all the nuclear fuel rods ever consumed, all the windmills and waterwheels, all the solar cells, and all the chemistry in all the batteries ever produced, have not directly delivered a single watt into the external circuit’s load. All that incredible fuel consumption and energy extracted from the environment has only been used to continually restore the source dipole that our own closed current loop circuits are deliberately designed to destroy faster than the load is powered.” [Thomas E. Bearden, “Extracting and Using Electromagnetic Energy from the Active Vacuum,” Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 2. Second Edition, Advances in Chemical Physics, Volume 119, Edited by Myron W. Evans. Series Editors I. Prigogine and Stuart A. Rice, John Wiley and Sons, 2001, p. 691-192].

For rigorous proof that removing that arbitrary 1892 Lorentz symmetry from the EE equations will result in vacuum currents becoming available for actual use in resulting asymmetric systems, we quote:

"Abstract: It is shown that if the Lorentz condition is discarded, the Maxwell–Heaviside field equations become the Lehnert equations, indicating the presence of charge density and current density in the vacuum. The Lehnert equations are a subset of the O(3) Yang–Mills field equations. Charge and current density in the vacuum are defined straightforwardly in terms of the vector potential and scalar potential, and are conceptually similar to Maxwell's displacement current, which also occurs in the classical vacuum. A demonstration is made of the existence of a time dependent classical vacuum polarization which appears if the Lorentz condition is discarded. Vacuum charge and current appear phenomenologically in the Lehnert equations but fundamentally in the O(3) Yang–Mills theory of classical electrodynamics. The latter also allows for the possibility of the existence of vacuum topological magnetic charge density and topological magnetic current density. Both O(3) and Lehnert equations are superior to the Maxwell–Heaviside equations in being able to describe phenomena not amenable to the latter. In theory, devices can be made to extract the energy associated with vacuum charge and current." [P. K. Anastasovski, T. E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W. T. Coffey, L. B. Crowell, G. J. Evans, M. W. Evans, R. Flower, S. Jeffers, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Mészáros, P. R. Molnár, J. P. Vigier and S. Roy: "Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum," Physica Scripta, Vol. 61, 2000, pp. 513-517.].

Very best wishes,

Tom Bearden, LTC, U.S. Army (Retired)

MS, Nuclear engineering.

Tom was born and raised in Cheniere, Louisiana.

(...)

From: Tom Bearden

Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 (...)

As you know, I had a heart attack in 2001, after undiagnosed 33 years of biological warfare poisoning done by my own governmental "guys". I was diagnosed with it finally in Dec. 2001, spent 2002 as my "year on antibiotics", and thereby finally rid my system of the BW-modified mycoplasma in my red blood cells after 33 years. But everything was damaged in that 33 years -- brain, nervous system, muscle system, skeletal system, internal organs, blood vessels and heart, etc. And nothing known to medical science can restore all that.

(...)

www.cheniere.org

http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html table of contents

http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/index.html

Howard JOHNSON Magnet Motor:

http://www.rexresearch.com/johnson/1johnson.htm

The Deliberate Curtailment of Nikola Tesla's Primary Energy Source:

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Deliberate_Curtailment_of_Nikola_Tesla%27s_Primary_Energy_Source

PESWiki.com -- Pure Energy Systems Wiki -- your publicly editable site about new energy technologies. Power to the people!

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Tom_Bearden

http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Nikola_Tesla

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Nikola_Tesla

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Electromagnetic

http://energysuppression.com/ Overview

This page is a compilation of specific cases in which the emergence of a new energy technology development is impaired in some way by an entity outside themselves, whether it be a competing interest such as an oil interest or an oppressive government, or some other faction whose control over the people or whose monopolistic income will be impaired by the emergence of the technology. There are however some hopeful signs that a new succesful physics theory (http://peswiki.com/index.php/Suppression_Suppressed) might deter the government's misrecognition. http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Suppression

...................

Nikola Tesla was ultimately murdered in 1943 when he attempted to make contact with FDR regarding 'energy extraction from the active medium' currently known as the 'vacuum of space-time' (in its virtual state) and ZPE (in the observable state). It was obviously feared that since Einstein was able to influence FDR to mobilize the 'atomic energy paradigm' with a massive 'governmental' effort, then quite possibly Tesla would have enabled just such a program for 'energy from the active medium' currently known as 'Energy From The Vacuum.'

The Coroner’s report did say he had been poisoned. Now it turns out that the only medium to my knowledge it actually cites that Tesla had been poisoned is the Yugoslavian film on Nikola Tesla called, “The Secret of Nikola Tesla.” So everybody can rewatch the introduction, because they say it right at the beginning. And they also say perhaps that he was killed by the Nazi’s."

Source: http://www.crest.org/discussion/green-power/200205/msg00011.html

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:The_Deliberate_Curtailment_of_Nikola_Tesla%27s_Primary_Energy_Source

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/science_technology/energy_free_energy/news.php?q=1217367766

................................................................

COPS TASE BARELY CONSCIOUS BOY WITH BROKEN BACK 19 TIMES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE !! (with video)

July 29, 2008

Police: Taser use is “not one of the unanswered questions” surrounding the case

You couldn’t make it up if you tried. Police in Ozark, Missouri repeatedly tased a critically injured sixteen year old boy after he “refused to comply with the officers”.

The cops were called to investigate reports of a boy walking along a busy overpass, but when they got there they found young Mace Hutchinson had fallen 30 ft to the ground below, breaking his back and and foot in the process.

When he did not co-operate with the cops they pulled out their stun guns and fired them into his body, shocking him up to nineteen times with 50,000 volts.(...)

The police are now trained that “pain compliance,” a euphemism for torture, is acceptable in apprehending anyone even if that person poses no physical danger.

The heart of the issue is that this was another act of wanton police brutality and torture by means of tasing.

http://www.infowars.com/?p=3621

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/health/abuse/news.php?q=1217365618

.................................

ACTION ALERT FOR FARMERS AND RANCHERS

July 28, 2008

Date: Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:21 AM

Dear Farmers and Ranchers,

Have you ever had trouble with Monsanto? Ever seen others you know have trouble? Has your community been affected over the last many years? Want a chance to do something serious about it finally?

OCM Organization for Competitive Markets held a meeting on Monsanto ... "Taking It Back"

http://www.dailyyonder.com/letter-langdon-talking-seeds-and-freedom-mark-twain-state-park and after that (July 22nd) OCM sent a letter to 23 state attorneys general explaining the economic implications of Monsanto's seed prices on rural communities and continues encouraging several state attorneys general to expand their antitrust investigation into Monsanto's suspected anticompetitive practices in the U.S. seed industry.

As you know, anti-trust cases are based on information about anti-competitive practices. Who has that information? You do.

You have information. And that information is power after so many years of powerlessness.

You have lived through what Monsanto has done to farmers, communities, seed businesses, seed-cleaning businesses, and families. You've seen and you've heard and many of you have suffered directly.

Monsanto has destroyed farming communities not just through its economic weight and patents and lawsuits but by bringing fear and shame in general. Neighbors felt spied on and people stopped trusting each other. People were ashamed by bankruptcy or loss of a business. Farms and businesses got picked off one at a time, throwing a chill into everything that once was connected and good.

OCM is fighting back - "Taking it back." Help them do it. Give them the information they need to win as many anti-trust cases against Monsanto as possible, state to state to state, by telling everything you know, with as much detail as you can provide.

Get together with you neighbors and tell them the time has come to fight back for American family farming and that telling the truth is how it's going to be done.

In fighting back together, you will be reconnecting your farming communities, using openness and courage and truth-telling as the glue, patching where shame and fear and secrecy tore things apart.

Please write your letters to:

Organization for Competitive Markets

Lincoln, NE 68506

www.competitivemarkets.com

For Immediate Release: July 22, 2008

Lincoln, NE - The Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) says Monsanto's market power is driving up seed prices and devastating farmers and their communities. OCM sent a letter explaining the economic implications of Monsanto's seed prices on rural communities to 23 state attorneys general today. The organization continues to encourage several state attorneys general to expand their antitrust investigation into Monsanto's suspected anticompetitive practices in the U.S. seed industry

"Monsanto's market power has been quietly accruing over several years and has now begun materially impacting price," said Keith Mudd, OCM's board president. "The lack of competition and innovation in the marketplace has reduced farmers' choices and enabled Monsanto to raise prices unencumbered."

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/environment/agriculture/news.php?q=1217365771

.....................

'It Feels Like A Sci-Fi Film' -- Accidents Tarnish Nuclear Dream (France)

(...)

Areva has been criticised by France's nuclear safety watchdog over the Tricastin leak for not adequately informing local authorities and for unsatisfactory measures and operational procedures. The leak rated at level one of the seven-stage scale of nuclear incidents.

It was detected on the night of July 7 but the town hall and locals who continued to drink water contaminated with uranium were not informed until the following afternoon. Areva's chief executive, Anne Lauvergeon, called the leak an "anomaly" which posed no danger to humans or the environment. The treatment plant has been shut and the subsidiary's director removed.

But in recent days there have been other, lesser incidents at nuclear sites. In Romans-sur-Isère, north of Tricastin, at another site run by an Areva subsidiary, officials discovered a burst underground pipe which had been broken for years and did not meet safety standards. A tiny amount of lightly enriched uranium leaked but not beyond the plant. This week, about 100 staff at Tricastin's nuclear reactor number four were contaminated by radioactive particles that escaped from a pipe. EDF described the contamination as "slight".

The French government has now ordered tests on the groundwater around all nuclear sites in France. The environment minister, Jean-Louis Borloo, said there were 86 level-one nuclear incidents in France last year and 114 in 2006.

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/environment/humans/nuclear_du_radiation/news.php?q=1217365320

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

tom-hen - july29th -35 Articles to Impeach Bushfraud ( 3 versions)// fw10 (6)

Must Read on Cell PHone Hazard

Tom Bearden