c-story..- - -
jeudi 5 juin 2008 22 h 06
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
25% REPORTED CREAMED OFF THE TOP OF SETTLEMENTS
LAST-MINUTE BLACKMAIL DEMAND 'AGREED TO' BY G-8 FINANCIAL POWERS
Friday 6 June 2008 00:22
CRIMINALIST CADRES RECOUP THEIR LOSSES UNDER GUISE OF 'HUMANITARIAN'
PETITION FOR 25% 'SLICE' BY WORLD BANK SANCTIONED BY THE WORLD COURT,
25% 'RANSOM MONEY' CONDITIONAL ON IMMEDIATE COMPLETION OF SETTLEMENTS
GIVEN BASEL-II 'SOURCE OF FUNDS', WILL THE CRIMS GET TO USE THEIR
POWERFUL COUNTRIES SIGNAL THEY MAY TAKE MATTERS INTO THEIR OWN HANDS
By Christopher Story FRSA,
Editor and Publisher, International
Currency Review, World Reports Limited,
London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your
subscriptions and our 'politically incorrect', hence correct,
intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.
• BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited
has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The
Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine,
by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The
European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The
New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The
Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are
permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.
• NOTE: The Subs/Books panel on the Home Page is a means to enable us
to communicate with subscribers, the purpose being to announce when
issues of our serials have been published, and also to provide updated
information on our Books. On 23rd May, the Editor appended an essay for
the specific benefit of subscribers to International Currency review,
the purpose of which was to inform them of progress on the publication
Volume 33, Numbers 3 & 4, which runs to almost 1,000 pages, and
will provide a massive historical record with detailed documentation
and updated information on the worst financial corruption crisis in
This private communication was lifted by
another website and placed onto their space out of any context, causing
some confusion. The reason for the confusion was that the information
published in the second panel, though accessible to anyone, represents,
as indicated, this Editor’s private communications with subscribers to
our printed intelligence publications. Therefore, what we say in the
second panel is nothing to do with anyone other than our actual or
• Please Make a Donation, if you
feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's
ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance
will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference,
hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and
linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor's $35,000 Wanta
bail-out money has been stolen.
LONDON, 6th June
2008: It has been reported to us that the World Court agreed to the
terms of a petition, believed to have been lodged by the World Bank,
providing for 25% to be sliced off the top of the aggregate Settlements
figure for redirection to ‘humanitarian’ purposes.
According to sources, the last-minute demand was accompanied by what
amounted to a threat that if this concession were not forthcoming, the
Settlements would be aborted. (The latest information at posting was
that they are moving forward, but such assertions, as we know, are
Pragmatic arguments presented to the World Court
may have focused on the ‘urgent’ requirement for additional finance to
enable the World Bank to come to the assistance of developing countries
that are being brought to the edge of destitution by rapidly rising
food and fuel prices.
No doubt every kind of
‘reasonable-sounding’ pleading that can be imagined, including ‘climate
change’ (previously known as global warming), will have been thrown
into the petition, for good measure. Also presented, no doubt, was the
argument that the global refinancing would be skewed if the World Bank
were not to be refinanced on a scale commensurate with the global
Settlements operation in parallel, given the importance of the World
Bank per se. And so on and so forth.
CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT TO THIS BLACKMAIL BY THE G-8
Our several sources inform us that, faced with this last-minute demand,
immense pressures (see below) were brought to bear, with the end-result
that the Group of Eight (G-8) financial powers finally AGREED to 25% of
the Settlements aggregate being creamed off the top, as requested.
HOWEVER, this concession was made contingent upon the following two
• The releases must have been completed by
Monday 9th June 2008.
In the event that there are any further delays, the 25% concession will
cease to apply and certain major countries will take matters into their
own hands. We have been requested not to elaborate on what this means,
at least at this juncture.
‘HUMANITARIAN PURPOSES’ IS CODE FOR PAYOFFS TO CRONIES
Being interpreted, what this latest disgraceful state of affairs means
is that, through one or more collectivised international financial
institutions, which are understood to have acted as cover for hidden
financial corruption on a massive scale over the years, payoffs may be
intended for all the usual suspects, headed by the Bush-Clinton crime
As the Editor knows from his observations and
reporting on embedded fraud inside the European Commission’s
structures, all these globalist collectivised institutions are riddled
with corruption or ‘creative accounting’, in their privileged,
taxation-free environment, not least since they report to nobody, are
subject to no meaningful external accounting disciplines, and nobody
takes ultimate responsibility for wrongdoing since the institution,
being a collective, takes decisions collectively, with the buck
Moreover, given this state of affairs, they develop their own
self-serving ‘ethic’ – which permits transactions to take place that
would be criminal if undertaken in the outside world.
Recipients of secret payoffs ultimately derived from this 25% ‘slice’,
aggregating multiple trillions of dollars, may, however, discover that
they could face ‘unanticipated’ difficulties to which they have never
been accustomed – such as having to provide ‘source of funds’
information, a consideration which suggests that, in practice, actual
enjoyment of their 'restored' funds may prove problematical.
Given the size of the Settlements overall, 25% would certainly RESTORE
the finances of the Bush Crime Family, which were decimated by
President Bush Jr., as a consequence of naked shorts and other
unfortunate operations (as we reported), and would FLOAT OFF Mrs
Hillary Clinton, so that her renewed financial muscle would enable her
to bribe whoever she needed to bribe, in order to avoid the fate that
otherwise may (or should) await her.
Mrs Clinton’s theatrically ‘delayed’ announcement of her withdrawal
from the competition to be the the Democratic presidential nominee for
the forthcoming US General Election is believed to have been DIRECTLY
RELATED to this coup against the Settlement funds, we understand.
For Jezebel is thought to have demanded, not least as a price for her
political cooperation and in lieu of no longer being able to ‘run’
stolen or diverted monies, a slice of the ‘clean’ Settlements funds – a
demand coordinated with the Bush Crime Family.
As a Senator
who has taken her oath of office, such behaviour is treason; but since
the holders of the highest offices in the United States have been
committing treason daily ever since they came to power, this
consideration is hardly likely to have weighed with this notorious CIA
THE CENTRAL ROLE TO DATE OF THE CIA’S HILLARY CLINTON
To appreciate this dimension, we need to rehearse a few basics about
Mrs Clinton’s role here.
Hillary Clinton, a long-term CIA operative with a reputation for
ruthlessness, was ‘promoted’ behind the scenes to run as candidate for
the Democratic nomination, by none other than Herr Godfather George H.
W. Bush Sr., inter alia so that she could ‘look after’ Bush Sr.’s
interests. Some the mists surrounding Jezebel’s activities in the
background have recently lifted, especially the blanket of fog that has
masked her alleged financial operations. Let us explain.
the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion was brought over from the People's Bank of
China in May 2006, as described in our Wantagate reports and confirmed
in the text of Mr Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [see
Wantagate reports dated 24th June and 5th July 2007], the funds were
hijacked by Bush Jr.’s newly appointed Treasury Secretary, (the late)
Henry M. Paulson, and were then ‘run’ by Mrs Hillary Clinton. This FACT
has been confirmed to us by several sources of late, but, although
previously mentioned in these reports, had not hitherto fallen into
Mrs Clinton competed for the Democratic nomination for a number of
motives, of which the least understood were that she was fronting for
George H. W. Bush Sr. (the Bushes and Clintons work together), was
tasked with running Wanta’s hijacked money, and was relied upon to
emerge as the Democratic candidate so that, the forthcoming election
having delivered the ‘necessary’ outcome, she would, as President, be
able to restore the financial corruption status quo, signalling
‘business as usual’ for the Bush Crime Family and its myriad associates
in the corrupted elements of the US intelligence, financial
intermediary and banking sectors – as though nothing had ever happened.
THE $6.2 TRILLION IN THE CITIBANK SUSPENSE ACCOUNT
The original $4.5 trillion that we were told had been earmarked for the
Wanta Settlement having first been replicated (several times over) and
then stolen, ‘replacement’ LOAN funds, believed to have been made
available by order of Her Majesty The Queen (probably deploying funds
furnished by a branch of the Rothschilds, although obviously this
cannot be confirmed), were delivered via the Bank of England into the
hands of Bank of New York Mellon, which was supposed to act as the
conduit for the funds, as we reported on 30th July 2007.
The ‘replacement’ monies, aggregating $6.2 trillion, were subsequently
established to be located with Citibank (as we also reported), where
secret bank accounts were discovered in the names of the key
highest-level criminalists, including the Clintons.
of these secret accounts was, and remains, Mr Robert Rubin, Clinton’s
former Treasury Secretary. Although Sir Win Bischoff, the senior
British banker originally from Schroders, who had apparently managed
some of Wanta’s funds many years ago, was sent over to Citibank in 2007
from London, together with Mrs Catherine Weir, as we believe, in order
to act as the eyes and ears of Her Majesty The Queen, the real power at
Citibank, given the state of affairs summarised here, has evidently
remained all along in the hands of Robert Rubin. He sat (and sits)
there, protecting the secret bank accounts and historically blocking
what was supposed to have been the Leo/Lee Wanta Settlement and Plan,
as approved in June 2007 by the Group of Eight financial powers.
THE SITUATION FACING MRS CLINTON IN EARLY JUNE 2008
Before continuing, we can take a quick glance at Mrs Hillary Clinton’s
political options prior to any decision on her part to step ‘out of the
nomination race’. It is known that the vote tallies in the New
Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Kentucky Democratic primaries were
rigged (using the same, long since exposed, electronic voting machine
scamming procedures that had enabled the Bush-supporting components of
the criminalised US intelligence community to steal the 2000 and 2004
Presidential Elections). It follows that, since the rigging of
electronic voting handled inter alia by the Diebold machines, continues
(exposure of this scandal having made no difference), voting in the
forthcoming US General Election will also be scammed. That can be taken
Since the Republican candidate, John McCain (Mr Cain), has indicated in
no uncertain terms that he will take steps that will de facto
facilitate a ‘reversion’ back to the (financial corruption) status quo,
should he be elected President, it is probable that Mrs Jezebel H.
Clinton could ‘arrange’ for (a) a proportion of her supporters to
switch to Mr John McCain (as has ALREADY been hinted at) and/or (b),
more to the point, for blatant electronic vote-rigging to take place,
as before, so that the outcome is again ‘thrown’ in favour of the
This sounds far-fetched, and it
may have become unlikely now, but it is EXACTLY the sort of thing that
these crooks are believed to have had in mind.
As we know, the
fact that Bush Jr. ‘stole’ the 2000 and 2004 General Elections has not
prevented him from ‘preaching democracy’ in the Middle East, in
repeated displays of hypocrisy so obnoxious that it has nauseated all
who could bear to absorb this information. But since WHEN was SHAME a
word that featured in the vocabulary of these criminalised mental
THE REAL REASONS MRS CLINTON SOUGHT THE NOMINATION
Notwithstanding that many influential Democratic Party figures had been
clamouring, both publicly and behind the scenes, for Mrs Jezebel to
retire from the ‘race’, her earlier confidence against the background
of mounting evidence of failure, and her behaviour in clinging to her
old status as the former Democratic front-runner, have puzzled all who
have been unaware of the REAL reasons that Mrs Clinton has been running
at all, which can be summarised as follows:
She has been fronting for George Bush Sr., guarding his flank and
illegally running the Wanta money as quid pro quo for facilitating an
intended reversion, come the new Presidency (Clinton or McCain), BACK
to corrupt business as usual.
She has been protecting her own future (as she may see it) from the day
of reckoning that may await her ‘down the pike’, given sealed
indictments against her and her vulnerability to retribution, e.g. for
the 'diversion' of that undeclared $500 million from Crozier Bank,
Grenada, and for other alleged crimes that would be much too tedious
and unpleasant to mention here. (When four US operatives went down to
Grenada to investigate that theft, it was discovered that the bank’s
video camera system tapes were blank during the precise period that
Jezebel was present in the bank).
presence on the US political stage contending for the Democratic
nomination buttressed the position of Robert Rubin, who as noted is the
guardian of the secret bank accounts held at Citibank in the names of
high-level US criminal operatives, all of whom have been diverting
The sudden demand for 25% of the Settlements aggregate
may have represented a bold Bolshevik throw of the dice by the
Bush-Clinton organised crime circles, along the lines of: as you won’t
let us continue to undertake our usual untaxed financial operations
below the radar, and as the British police have seized our collateral
[see below], we will take 25% of the ‘clean’ Settlements money, thank
you. Otherwise we’ll see to it that George Bush Jr. continues to block
5TH JUNE: WORLD BANK SUDDENLY SOLICITS G-8 ‘PROJECTS’
On 5th June, sources advised us that, all of a sudden, the Group of
Eight financial powers were being solicited by the World Bank for
(‘humanitarian’) ‘projects’, to be funded by the 25% that has been or
is to be creamed off the top of the Settlements aggregate. We know how
much money is involved, but it has been suggested that we should not
reveal this information.
The kind of scenario would be that a given Group of Eight country would
respond to such urgent solicitations by informing the World Bank that,
oh, we’d like, say, five hundred billion to upgrade our entire mass
transit network, or: we need ten new nuclear power stations, at, say,
$2.0 billion a piece, please. Response: Great, we will allocate $X
billion for this, that and the other project, and another $Y billion
for your second choices. Or whatever – ‘projects’ being the standard
cover for corrupt, hidden fiat financial operations and payoffs.
Remember: every corrupt financial operation has to be ‘covered’ and
therefore masked by a ‘plausible’ front project (preferably labelled
with a marketable humanitarian or global warming dimension, for public
In other words, the sudden World Bank requests for ‘project’
information from the Group of Eight countries that reportedly 'agreed
to' the 25% ‘tax’, represent a collective OBFUSCATION initiative to
provide the necessary ‘justification’ to cover the ‘expenditure’ of the
25% ‘penalty’ or blackmail money hijacked from the Settlements
aggregate at the last moment, as reported.
We need hardly be
fooled by these sudden ‘feelers’ requesting the Group of Eight
countries to submit ‘project’ proposals, knowing, as we do, that only a
small proportion of such projects (a few cosmetic ones) will ever
materialise – with the bulk of the funds earmarked for the
aforementioned payoffs, including huge remittances to the Bush and
Clinton Crime Families.
So Mrs Clinton will, according to
this analysis and on the basis of these reports, be ‘floated off’ after
she has left the nomination stage; and because of her new ‘bribery
power’, she will (it may be cynically assumed) become ‘untouchable’
again. Back to Square One.
These solicitations for ‘humanitarian projects’ from the G-8 countries
which started on 5th June, provide us with indirect confirmation (on
top of other indications) that the 25% ‘charge’ levied at the last
moment by the criminalist cadres, fronted by the World Bank, has been
THE 25% DEMAND: BACKDROP TO BUSH’S TRIP TO GERMANY?
It is likely that Mrs Jezebel stalled, with respect to her conceding to
Obama, while this last brazen piece of treasonous blackmail against the
whole world, was attempted and conceded by the Group of Eight financial
powers. It is easy to see how the G-8 countries will have fallen for
this ruse: after all, not only would some key leaders have been made
aware of ‘tempting offers’, but the prospect of huge projects’ being
financed and offering untold further opportunities for graft, will have
been mouth-watering. Exactly how long this particular obfuscation
process may take, is anybody’s guess.
Ominously, President George W. Bush Jr. is reported to be scheduled
imminently to visit Germany, as was the case in June 2006 and again in
June 2007. Given that George Bush Sr. implements long-range strategy
developed by the Pan-German Abwehr (Deutsche Vertiedigungs Dienst)
operatives working from their Dachau headquarters, these visits by
George Bush Jr. to Germany, always timed to coincide with the most
sensitive phases of this crisis, are naturally disconcerting.
THE SEIZURE OF THE SAFETY LOCK BOXES IN LONDON
In the light of the above, we can now perceive more clearly how the
seizure of 7,000 safety lock boxes and vaults by 300 heavily armed
British police undertaken on Monday 2nd June, which has been continuing
ever since, fits into the picture. Each of the 7,000 boxes or vaults is
being treated as a separate crime scene. We can also understand more
easily why the Metropolitan Police made sure that the press were
briefed ahead of these raids, so that photographers and reporters could
be present at the scene of the Mayfair operation.
In our report on 4th June, we noted that the splurge of orchestrated
publicity that followed the raids in Mayfair last Monday, was not
replicated in the press the following day, and we suggested that this
indicated the likelihhod that further press coverage of the
unprecedented British police operation had been officially discouraged.
But given the heightened international tensions of which the
police raids were symptomatic (see below), any de facto ‘gag’ was
almost immediately lifted, since on 5th June, reports on the police
lock box and vault seizures appeared in The Independent, The Sun, the
London Evening Standard and the Belfast Telegraph, to name some of the
UK newspapers monitored.
The purpose of the preplanned
Scotland Yard publicity on Tuesday 3rd June was to signal to the
criminalist cadres, governments and elements concerned with the
Settlements that they have lost control of the situation and that they
will be held to account, that the $6.2 billion 'replacement' loan funds
held in the suspense account with Citibank is now hostage to the
British authorities, and that matters had better proceed seamlessly,
without further ado.
We are reliably advised that our assessment of the importance of this
police operation has been correct, because the safety boxes are indeed
believed to contain nothing less than many of the original stolen
assets and documentation, including possibly some Wanta assets, that
have been used since the 1980s as collateral for the vast hypothecation
and leverage operations which have brought the world financial system
to the brink of collapse.
As we pointed out in the report
dated 4th June, original underlying assets and collateral have tended
to be held in safety deposit boxes outside the banking system, at
commercial operations such as Safe Deposit Centres Limited that are
believed to be controlled by intelligence cadres – with the ‘derived’
assets, rather than the original collateral, being held in safety lock
boxes at financial institutions (although this pattern is thought to be
very far from universal).
In this connection, the British police investigations may well identify
the whereabouts of the gold confiscated during the ransacking of the
Central Bank of Iraq, which was reportedly brought to London. Some or
all of this gold could have been stored in the vaults with Safe Deposit
Centres Limited in Mayfair or Edgware.
It has also been
suggested to us that Rafidain Bank assets/collateral, seized after the
Central Bank of Iraq had been taken over, could turn up in these safety
deposit lock boxes and/or vaults. One motive for the Bush Crime Family
attacks on Iraq will have been the recovery or stealing of assets used
or held by Saddam Hussein from the days when George Bush Sr. et al and
the Iraqi dictator, trained along Nazi lines, were 'buddy buddy'
partners in crime.
INVESTIGATIONS WILL LEAD TO GROUP OF EIGHT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
It stands to reason that the drastic mass seizure of the safety lock
boxes by the Metropolitan Police raises pertinent questions about these
original assets and will inevitably direct police enquiries to
financial institutions, including some of the biggest financial names
in the United States, Canada, Britain, Japan, Germany, Switzerland, the
Netherlands and Israel. We COULD name the institutions that are liable
to find themselves subjected to police enquiries, the senior personnel
of which will wind up under investigation and interrogation; but we
won’t, for the time being.
Now, given that the banks in
question ‘belong to’ Group of Eight countries, some idea can perhaps be
gained as to the nature of the immense pressures that have been/are
being brought to bear on the Group of Eight financial powers:
On the one hand, the leaders of some of these countries are said to be
beside themselves with anger at the brazen Bolshevik blackmail
perpetrated via the World Bank on behalf of the criminalist cadres, in
demanding a 25% ‘cut’, accompanied by the threat, implied or otherwise,
that, if this were not to be forthcoming, the entire Settlement process
would be aborted.
• On the
other hand, given the timing of the raids on the lock boxes and vaults
in London by the British police, some of the Group of Eight's biggest
institutions and their senior personnel are in imminent danger of being
exposed as criminal enterprises, like Citibank and the other American
institutions that we have identified as such in the past.
BRITISH POLICE HAVE SEIZED THE UNDERLYING COLLATERAL
So what, then, was the real significance of the timing of the British
We speculate that the seizure of the safety deposit boxes and vaults
represents a long overdue retaliatory measure by the British
authorities which ‘just happens’ to provide immense leverage against
ALL concerned, to ensure that the Settlements process is completed –
and at the same time to signal to the criminalist forces hiding behind
the cover provided by the World Bank that if they imagine that they can
revert to ‘business as usual’ by exploiting the 25% ‘tax’ that has been
abruptly imposed at the last minute, they have another shock coming.
At the same time, if they interfere with the Settlements now (as was
clearly continuing to happen as this report was being prepared,
although we were still being told that matters were ‘progressing’), the
British authorities may hold all the trump cards and (put it this way)
the police investigations will ‘run their full course’. And remember,
this devastating cornucopia of prospective sanctions is quite separate
from the measures that several very powerful countries have made it
clear, behind the scenes, that they will take, if the US and German
criminalists continue to overplay their hand.
One can also imagine certain tense ongoing international exchanges,
including such equations as this: ‘Halt the British police
investigations’. ‘No, we don’t do that kind of thing in Britain. We
have no powers to do so, even if we were so inclined, which we aren’t’.
‘Then we’ll carry on sabotaging the Settlements’. ‘Go right ahead:
we’ll recall the $6.2 trillion (CASH) from Citibank’. ‘Why don’t you
try that? You’ll destabilise the entire international banking system,
including banks in the United Kingdom’. ‘Not relevant. The police are
in the driving seat’.
Finally, we have to say that we have
been advised, within the past 36 hours, by TWO completely separate
informed sources, one British, one American, that the level of tension
behind the scenes, arising from this Luciferian intelligence war over
money, has reached the stage at which certain preparations are being
made just in case the outcome fails to meet demands and expectations.
That’s all we can safely say at this juncture. (...)