HOW BUSH, CHENEY RIPPED OFF THE
CIA AND THE PENTAGON
SCAMMING OPERATIONS SET UP INSIDE BOTH ORGANISATIONS
Monday 26 May 2008 19:09
INTERNAL STEALING STRUCTURES ESTABLISHED UNDER BUSH’S EXECUTIVE
RAPIDLY WIDENING SCOPE OF EXPOSURE OF HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS
STAGGERING BREACHES OF NATIONAL SECURITY DUE TO CHENEY’S CORRUPTION
168 CIA DEATHS ATTRIBUTED TO CHENEY'S BLACKMAILED HALLIBURTON SCAMSTERS
PLUS: UPDATED INFORMATION ON THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL SETTLEMENTS
By Christopher Story
Editor and Publisher, International
, World Reports Limited
London and New York.
HELLISH STRUGGLE AGAINST THE DARK FORCES
the severe setback delivered to the Dark Forces by the international
community, which has demanded and is procuring the return of stolen
moneys with compound interest, a ‘Black’ struggle has been raging
behind the scenes as various poisonous heads of the Octopus are
repetitively stamped on and finally put out of action.
struggle is more dreadful, by an order of magnitude, even than the red
hot intelligence war (over MONEY) that has been raging behind the
scenes against the background of the raping of the dollar fiat money
system by the most dangerous claque of world-class financial criminals
ever to darken the face of the Earth, headed by the Bush Crime Family
and Cheney (detained).
‘AS YOU WON’T LET
US STEAL MONEY ANY MORE, WE’VE RIGGED OIL PRICES INSTEAD’
exchange for not being allowed to keep the money they have stolen and
replicated, associates of the severely traumatised criminalists are
seeing to it that the American people and the Rest of the World pay for
this unanticipated cumulative setback to the unfettered greed of these
This is being done on the back of the Bush-weakened
dollar by rigging oil prices via those de facto speculative cartel
operations run out of the trading rooms of the world’s biggest
collaborating oil corporations, as mentioned in our report dated 9th
A distinguished former US commodity broker and trader for
decades, informs us that he foresees a precipitous drop in the price of
crude oil. George Soros, the world's biggest hedge fund investor,
stated on 25th May that the oil price chart had acquired a 'parabolic
shape charcteristic of a bubble'.
This price-rigging has
decisively separated the oil price from the observable underlying
economic fundamentals, characterised by increased production from
‘secondary sources’ (including 200,000 barrels per day (BPD) from
Nigeria, an additional 300,000 BPD from Kirkuk, Northern Iraq, and even
300,000 extra BPD from Saudi Arabia), oil stocks held by the ‘rich’
countries above their five-year average, with ‘comfortable’ cover for
53 days, drivers resolving to undertake fewer journeys in order to curb
expenditure on fuel, and economists’ predictions of recession and worse
over the months and years ahead.
The false price structure has
been achieved with the assistance of a colossal leveraging in the
futures marketplace, put options in futures and on the OTC market, plus
cash forward contracts, allied to shorts and put option buys
referencing the oil sisters’ stocks, all with the objective of stealing
vast rental profits immediately, with the proceeds paid directly into
multi-owner levels of anonymous nominee accounts located in the usual
suspect untaxed domiciles.
other words, the equation is as follows: ‘If you won’t allow us to
steal your money, we’ll steal it anyway, by other means: and there will
be nothing you can do about it’.
GLOBAL REFINANCING SETTLEMENTS PROGRESS UPDATE
15th May an official involved in the Settlements was genuinely unable
to appear at a certain US bank within the relevant allocated ‘window’
settlements timeframe due to a sudden (unexplained and disturbing)
circumstance that befell a member of his family.
Madame Wu was then
informed, and agreed to ‘hold off’ application of the drastic powers of
execution that she had obtained from the World Court/ICJ, but indicated
that if matters were not concluded by close of business on 16th May
2008, she would proceed anyway.
Closure did not take place and so,
according to our sources, Madame Wu procured liens on two banks,
believed to have been based in Europe. A bank that is attached with
such a Writ of Lien (Execution) suffers an immediate destruction of its
creditworthiness if such information becomes public knowledge, which is
not the case in respect of the identity of the institutions in
question. However it is the duty of the Editor of International
to inform our subscribers, in particular, of such
developments in general terms.
Tuesday 20th May, the British Ministry of Defence finally announced
that it was ready to go ahead with signing the contracts for the two
65,000-tonne Future Aircraft Carriers (CVTs) with a joint venture being
formed by BAE Systems and VT Group, which will be named BVT Surface
new British consortium will be a key member of the Aircraft Carrier
Alliance of companies that will now construct and assemble the new
carriers at shipyards in Portsmouth, Barrow-in-Furness, Glasgow and
Rosyth. The initial [sic!] cost of these two carriers will be
billion (viz., almost $8.0 billion), including capitalised expenditure
to date. The ships, which as previously indicated will be financed
using funds derived from the Settlements, are expected to enter service
during 2014 and in 2016. The two British corporations said that they
expect relevant transactions documentation to be signed shortly, a
clear indication that the Settlement process is nearing completion.
CLINTON ASSASSINATION THREAT ANTICIPATED ON 9TH MAY
In our report dated 9th May, we commented as follows:
While Mrs Clinton, the candidate of the Dark Forces, remains on the
ticket for the Presidency (not much longer, surely, unless they ‘do
something’ to Mr Barrak Obama, which would not be beyond ‘them’ at
all), the criminalist cadres can be relied upon to rest their rapidly
vanishing hopes of ‘business as usual’ on this Jezebel becoming
For President, we should now read Vice President, so
that she can continue in Unterreichsführer Cheney’s duplicitous
destructively corrupt role (see below). Not long afterwards, Mrs
Clinton uttered a slip of the tongue in which the possibility of an
assassination attempt on Mr Obama was clearly hinted at. You read it
MADAME WU REPORTED TO HAVE ‘SEIZED’ FOUR MORE BANKS
On Saturday or over the weekend of 17th/18th May, as matters went from
bad to worse, Madame Wu was reported to us to have ‘seized’ two further
institutions. We learned on the following Tuesday that two more banks, for a total of six to
had been liened by the Chinese under their Writ of
Execution, on or immediately after Monday 19th May.
The current state of affairs, as reported to us, is that a ‘doomsday
deadline’ believed to be close of business EST on
Wednesday 28th May 2008
has been set by the Chinese, who are owed vast sums of withheld and
stolen money, which, if not met, will incur very drastic consequences
and which the Cheney-Bush gangsters [see below] will have been
explicitly responsible for provoking.
According to the Editor’s
information, the situation could not be more serious short of World
War, although due to certain decisive recent developments the problems
arising from the highest-level gangsters’ reprobate behaviour over a
prolonged period of time ........ are being overcome.
Unsurprisingly, these matters went unreported even by outlets that had
been purporting to be keeping payees abreast
is supposed to have been going on behind the scenes.
Wu, previously hailed as the saviour, was now, all of a sudden,
collaborating with Bush and worthy of unspeakable consequences. Her
Majesty the Queen, who had suffered the theft of her gold by the US
mobsters, was again pilloried, as these US disinformation hacks are apt
to do, from time to time, when they have run out of targets to
excoriate, in the endless quest to deflect blame
for a crisis ...... that is exclusively attributable to
corruption inside the US structures, as will be exposed in considerable
THE DETENTION OF THE UNTERREICHSFUHRER AND THE HEAD OF THE REICHSBANK
On Friday 16th and Saturday 17th May, Unterreichsführer
Reinhard B. ‘Himmler’ Cheney was
‘taken into detention’, but was reportedly released on or about the
17th, whereupon, as was inevitable, he immediately interfered yet again
with the Settlements, in response to which he was detained (we believe)
On or around the same timeframe, Dr Ben
Bernanke, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve (the Reichsbank), was
reported to us to have been taken into detention as well. A number of
‘Cheney people’ plus two Federal Reserve officials were further
reported to us on 21st May as having been detained. These reports were
subsequently verified by honourable sources trusted by this service. It
is understood that Cheney was obliged to sign documentation that he
would have preferred not to have signed, at some stage during this
‘rapid unfolding of events’ (Lenin).
THE TEN-GALLON HAT EPISODE
On Wednesday 21st May, a ‘Cheney’, sporting a
was reported by Associated Press, well known to be a US Government
mouthpiece, to have addressed 200 graduating Coastguard cadet officers
at the 127th commencement ceremony at the US Coast Guard Academy. Also
on the podium was Homeland
Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (Reichsminister Hermann Goering).
Cheney does not wear hats, and neither does he stand upright. He is
‘vertically challenged’ and is rather stout. The 'gentleman' under the
ten-gallon hat stood up straight and was somewhat thinner than the
latter-day Himmler is known to be. The wearer of the ten-gallon hat was
greeted with ‘a thunderous 19-gun salute. A jet and helicopter flew
over as cadets tossed their hats in the air’. Himmler did not follow
suit in order not to blow his cover (so to speak).
To give them
their due, certain members of the Fourth Estate thought there was
‘something funny’ about the Unterreichsführer double’s headgear.
starters, he should have removed his bonnet during the parade of
colours. So a Connecticut reporter, Ted Mann, asked Cheney spokesfemale
Megan Mitchell; ‘what’s up with that hat?’ She elucidated helpfully:
‘It’s to protect his head from the sun’ which is rather like explaining
that the purpose of a rubber duck is to play with it in the bath.
his credit, the disbelieving Mann wrote afterwards: ‘Well. There goes
our still-developing theory about the airfoil properties of ten-gallon
hat brims’. Asked to comment by the Editor of this service, a veteran
US analyst ‘with connections’ whom we have known for many years
responded to us on 23rd May at 00:50 UK time in the following vein,
having studied the video images in question:
‘Here are a few
comments regarding Cheney’s ten-gallon hat and here is my take on the
chapeau. This guy’s performing a balancing act as a Cheney double.
I have seen numerous photos and this Cheney is thinner and is not
stupped over with a hump in his back when he walks. Furthermore the
double’s head didn’t match Cheney’s ..... so they affixed a
Texas-style bonnet on it and viola! Only a long-horned steer could tell
the difference by the stink!’
Unstated was the
intelligence, reported to us, that two of the Unterreichsführer’s
doubles have already been ‘liquidated’, in order to impress upon this
monster that he, too, can suffer the same fate, a point that, prior to
his latest detention at least, he appears not to have taken on board.
For instance, around ‘Paulson time’, we were further informed that
Cheney had been shot. Since the Editor knew that Cheney had an
appointment to meet the Prime Minister of Finland on 14th January, he
took care to telephone the Finnish Embassy in London to verify that the
said meeting had taken place: and it had. By that time, Cheney was one
double down, with perhaps two to go. It is possible that a Cheney
double was ‘lost’ during that showdown on the Sydney Airport tarmac.
Alternatively, a double may have been liquidated during the gun battle
which is known to have erupted at the Vice Presidential premises in
June 2007, which was hushed up at the time.
21st May, as we and Associated Press (again) reported, the
Unterreichsführer had visited the Philadelphia Regional Financial
Center, part of the US Treasury Department’s integrated Financial
Management Service, to utter some inconsequential remarks about the
economic stimulus checks that will be delivered by the generous United
States Government to pacify the pent-up anger of some 130 million
As we pointed out, the US officials who would
have been expected to attend such a Treasury facility would be either
the Reichsfinanzminister or the Under Secretary of the Treasury, but
NOT the Vice President of the United States. Given the verbal trashing
that the Editor received between 2nd and 9th January 2008 after
reporting the Paulson matter, the silence that followed our reference
to the anomaly of Cheney doing the job of the Treasury Secretary or the
Under Secretary, was by contrast stiflingly deafening, and ‘spoke for
OBFUSCATING THE DESCENT OF THE CURTAIN AT THE CONCLUSION OF ‘ACT ONE’
the necessary continuing allowances for the observable fact that the
counterintelligence disinformation, diversion and confusion-building
apparat appears to have been instructed to work overtime chasing
windmills and throwing sand in the air so that the actual completion of
'Act One' by remittance of the Settlements takes places as far as
possible behind a dense smokescreen of disinformation and
confusion,........ it has been clear for weeks that several directives
may have been issued. We have had numerous lies fed to us, which, when
evaluated, have been traced back to the Treasury, reported to remain
still in ‘never-never’ land because it reports to Der Führer, who
there. If we were to publish a study of the crass lies in question,
readers would be entitled to ask whether the US official structures
have all contracted an advanced form of senile dementia, as these
people play fast and loose with facts on a scale that we have never
encountered before from any Western Government. On purpose by mistake,
directive would appear to relate to the spreading of unsubstantiated
rumours and libels, for instance against Madame Wu and Her Majesty The
Queen, and even against the lowly Editor of this service [see Appendix
to this report]; while another appears to be related to an operation to
‘roll up’ the Bush-Cheney-Clinton strands, at least, of the corrosive,
decadent criminalist network.
There may also be a third
directive, the purpose of which will have been to DISCREDIT EVERYONE
both individually and collectively. That is the usual procedure when a
huge deception operation blows up in their faces, as has happened with
this nexus of unprecedented financial scandals.
1992 and later, at least 420 people with knowledge of the official
criminality were ‘liquidated’ in a Stalinist-style purge, although far
more operatives and family members perished than has yet been generally
understood to be the case.
This time round, ‘rolling up’ all
traces of the criminality has probably been frustrated beyond recall by
EXPOSURE, and is unlikely to be a practical proposition due not least
to the fact that relevant patriotic law enforcement is genuinely
engaged, we believe, in proceeding to raise the curtain for 'Act Two'
[see report dated 9th May: Archive].
RAISING THE CURTAIN FOR 'ACT TWO'
As the Editor surmised, this is indeed having to be done ‘by other
means’ (to cite Lenin) because implementing the Reformation Act would
necessitate bringing all US troops engaged in illegal wars back home.
The fact that, according to Buchanan and Roberts [report, 17th May],
25% of the Iraqi population has been killed, maimed, incapacitated or
forced to assume refugee status while large numbers of American and
British troops have been killed in order to ensure the odious
criminalists their ‘Black’ profits since the illegal invasion in 2003,
...... is conveniently overlooked in this context.
The forthcoming huge issue of International
[see Subs/Books panel on the Home Page: Editor’s
posting dated 23rd May 2008] will contain documentary proof of the stealing by US
criminalist operatives and associates of The Queen’s ‘product’ (gold)
on 29th-30th March 2007,
for which the Editor of this service was excoriated without a cause by
a former US friend of his who could not have possessed any knowledge of
this matter. Those who have again started to lambast The Queen
conveniently overlook the FACT that it was the US criminalists, whom we
are standing up to on their behalf, who stole The Queen’s gold.
for Madame Wu, acting on instructions from the Chinese Government and
associates to collect their stolen funds from the American crooks, the
US criminalist fools are believed to have assumed that they could
outmanoeuvre her right through this huge crisis, which continues to be
ignored by the controlled Fourth Estate on both sides of the Atlantic,
with Operation Mockingbird still in full throttle in the United States.
disinformation about Madame Wu has been intended to mask the disgrace
that certain US parties feel at being forced to comply with the
requirements of the international community and the Chinese, who are
the biggest foreign victims of these crimes.
At 11.30pm UK time on 26th May, the Editor was informed that Madame Wu was flying
back to the United States,
ready to order the 'doomsday' steps that she is entitled to take
failing completion of the Settlements by the deadline mentioned above.
This information was not provided by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S, but by
other completely separate sources trusted by this service.
EXPOSURE OF THE OFFICIAL CRIMINALITY IS BEING AUGMENTED BY TIMED LEAKS
this distressing ‘mainstream’ cover-up of the biggest crime story in
world history, and extensive control, through the manipulation of Fifth
Estate (Internet) websites by the colossal US disinformation apparat,
the discrediting manipulators make full use of all available media
outlets when they have an urgent agenda to implement.
A case in point was monitored on 22nd May, when it was
reported that Stanley
a former Senior Adviser to Bob Dole, and a man who has known rogue
operatives Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades, was reported to have
made the following comments on the Alex Jones radio show:
(9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush
personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He
is guilty of treason and mass murder’.
When we discussed this
matter with a knowledgeable source, Stanley Hilton was dismissed as a
long-term ‘tool’ and Alex Jones received ‘bad marks’. Now, the Editor
is aware that this pundit has been described as what is known as ‘a
balancer’, which is to say that he ‘modulates’ the interface between
the ‘Dark World’ and the ‘real’ world. As for Stanley Hilton’s
background, the nature of his ‘baggage’ is not the point. There is only
one relevant issue here: all of sudden, what thinking people and anyone
not sitting on their brains has known since 12th September 2001, is now
being stated openly, by a former Beltway Insider, as FACT.
far as we know, Mr S. Hilton is still walking. Why should this be the
case? Answer: because the green light has at last been given,
consistently with proceeding forward with 'Act Two', to roll up the
Bush-Cheney-Clinton giga-crime network, or Weltkriminalgesellschaft.
course, it is SCANDALOUS that we have had to wait seven years for this
to happen, just as it is scandalous that the US cadres concerned
disseminated the lie that about 3,000 people died at the Twin
when at least ten times that number perished (again,
see our 9th May report: no-one has come forward to refute that
calculation, while several sources have corroborated the estimate as
being ‘ballpark accurate’). The Editor knows this to be the case, as he
endured the stench in Midtown Manhattan for weeks.
(( Friday 9 May
2008 report: http://www.worldreports.org/news/132_refinancing_the_world_and_refloating_the_u.s._dollar
all reports: http://www.worldreports.org/news
Hilton to state what we all instinctively (and, on the basis in many
cases of years of research) know to be true, begs the question: if that
is the case today, Stanley Hilton, why didn’t you say so earlier? To
which the answer has to be the same: the cynical green light (in the
form of a directive) has now been given to make the perpetrators (or
some of them) pay for their crimes. And the first step towards
achieving that is through exposure: whereupon, all of a sudden, the
despised media becomes ‘useful’. Stand by for 'mainstream' reports
suddenly focusing on the underlying facts.
Perhaps it is at last sensed within the confused and
terrified Beltway that the risks of continuing the cover-up outweigh
the risks of finally exposing the main perpetrators of these
abominations, and making them pay for their heinous crimes. More
likely, the main calculations underlying this development are entirely
pragmatic, having to do with proceeding to 'Act Two' ‘by other means’.
ON THE LOOKOUT FOR FURTHER EXPOSURES FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES
all events, the Editor has naturally been on the lookout for further
indications that the cornered perpetrators are about to face their
overdue days of reckoning at long last. The desperation of the
Clintons to force Mrs Rodomski onto the Obama ticket as Vice President
is of course indicative of the fact that if they can’t pull that off,
they are ‘finished’. If Jezebel were to become Vice President, she
would simply replace Cheney, which is no doubt what the two ‘Black’
groups believed to reside within the criminalised CIA have been rooting
for (bearing in mind that all Presidential candidates on the stage are
controlled and handled intelligence operatives, given that the
criminalised US intelligence community is in control, out of control
and needs to be brought under control).
Cheney ‘works’ for Bush Sr. and is Bush Jr.’s handler (or was, prior to
his latest ‘detention’). Jezebel would simply ensure that President
Obama could do nothing to prevent her terminating the essential
fumigation of the pigsty which, we are led to believe, has now
commenced ('Act Two'), and continuing corrupt ‘business as usual’,
together with murderous repression of all who stand in her way. But the
further we progress, the less feasible this fallback scenario appears
The Editor did not
have to wait long before an enormous file erupted into his presence.
Since the provenance of this file is very well respected, and it has
been made available to the Editor by an equally respected intermediary,
the Editor read the
file instead of retiring for the night on 25th May.
After reading it, he understood how little he has known all along about
the magnitude of the United States’ corruption crisis, which can only
be explained (as we have done in the past) as an assault by a
loathesome enemy, which the Editor continues to identify as Deutsche
Verteidigungs Dienst (Dachau), the long-range Nazi strategic deception
Continuum, working in collaboration with others in ‘sib’ mode, and
clandestinely with the covert continuing Soviets.
UNPRECEDENTED BREACHES OF U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY DUE TO THE CORRUPTION
penetration and breaches of US national security that we are about to
expose here are so vast, unprecedented and pervasive, that to attribute
them simplistically to the successful takeover of the Federal
Government by the Chicago mafia would be
The source of the
file, obtained via
the Editor’s intermediary,
is Mr Robert Chapman, Founder, Editor and Publisher of The
International Forecaster financial newsletter, which has a very good
A former CIA counterintelligence officer (many years
ago), Robert Chapman acquired expertise through personal experience as
a broker and the former owner of a brokerage. (( http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/Bob_Chapman
a consequence of this intervention, the Editor may be obliged to tweak
(but only very slightly) his ongoing, routine denunciation of the CIA
as an unmitigated force for evil in the world, a stance that is, in
turn, based upon the Editor’s experience and perception that ‘there is
no such thing as a ‘White Hat’’. There is, however, such a thing as a
former 'Grey Hat' that has been bleached White.
By way of introduction, Mr Chapman has just informed his subscribers as
former high-ranking member of the CIA, now retired, who was a career
employee, contacted us this week. Due to our reporting on Halliburton
and their corruption, we were given 46 pages
on how Halliburton, the CIA, the Pentagon and Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld
have been stealing billions of dollars’ [sic: Trillions, surely: Ed.].
What we were presented with .... will shortly be presented to Congressman Waxman’s
Oversight and Reform Committee in the House’.
46 pages of step-by-step criminal procedure [form] only part of a
larger body of evidence being presented to Congress. What is presented
is astonishing in the scope of the crimes and the billions of dollars
stolen by these criminals'.
text is raw copy never seen by the public previously. This is a long
read, but it reveals the depth of the official corruption within our
Government. It is our desire that as many Americans as possible read
this report. It is devastating. The writer worked under Porter Goss
until August 2004. Vice President Cheney forced Tenet out of the Agency
and later [forced] this writer [out as well]'.
'We have not
edited any of the text. It would be presumptuous of us to do so. The
writer was assigned the rank of a Two-Star General when lent to the
Pentagon by the CIA’.
WE NOW PRESENT THIS MATERIAL FOR AS MANY AMERICANS TO READ AS POSSIBLE
conformity with the stance adopted by Robert Chapman, and in deference
to the Editor’s own distinguished intermediary who sent this material
to the Editor on 25th May, we have adopted the following procedure
(1) First, the exact language is retained, with some slight editing and
some omissions on grounds of length. Certain intervening meaningless
characters implying extraction of the lengthy text from an incompatible
program have been deleted;
The Editor has broken up the text into groups of paragraphs, preceded
by cross-heads, to facilitate comprehension of what this document
(3) The Editor has
selected components of the text/testimony verbatim, but has omitted
sections which elaborate existing material, the object being to provide
an overview of this previously never published ‘hard copy’ information
which indicates the catastrophic proportions of the embedded US
official corruption while, we believe, revealing only perhaps 1% of
what has been going on.
As noted, the Editor read this text in
the middle of the night of 25th/26th May, in order to assess what
should be done with this material. He decided to post this straight
He would add the following:
There is some very unpleasant detail, which all readers will find
unbearable, but which cannot be excluded, otherwise the whole point of
this exposure will be lost; and:
There are clear references to the Illuminati’s satanic activity which,
we know goes on behind the scenes and which is addressed in the
Editor’s book The
New Underworld Order
here, at last, we have hands-on, officially-sourced information
identifying Cheney as what we always thought he was: a reincarnation of
the worst manifestation of corrupt Luciferian Nazism, exhibiting an
unrestrained ‘Black’ idolatry of money for self-enrichment, global
power and control purposes which has corrupted the entire American
Government from the top down. Fish rot from the head, and the stench of
this rotting corpse can be smelt all round the world.
CULTURE OF ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION (‘ANOMIE’) REVEALED BY EMILE DIRKHEIM
is perhaps surprising that Robert Chapman has not connected this
devastating intelligence with the colossal financial corruption crisis
that we have been reporting. No criticism whatsoever is intended if we
wonder why there is surprise that billions have been stolen by these
crooks, when we know now that the sums stolen, diverted and
misappropriated under Cheney and Bush (the two most corrupt holders of
high office in US history) run into the hundreds of trillions of
It is also quite surprising that the veteran and
extremely accomplished and courageous former CIA officer who has
delivered this devastating data (with a great deal more to come) to a
Congressional Committee, appears to have been unaware of the far
larger, indeed gargantuan financial corruption scams, thefts and
diversions over which this same repulsive Cheney fellow has presided in
what is revealed herewith is evidence of the Bush Crime Family’s
underlying, structured culture of TOTAL CORRUPTION (that is to say, of
the ‘anomie’ environment initially identified by the French criminologist
Emile Dirkheim [1858-1917]),
perpetual criminality is the norm, and adherence to the Rule of Law is
considered aberrant, eccentric, and worthy [see below] of death.
is deeply compromised, with 1,500+ people on The Hill having been
identified in April 2007, as we reported at the time, as beneficiaries
of secret offshore bank accounts. Bribery of legislators under Cheney
has been extensive.
Therefore, some will ask: what is to be gained from forwarding this
deadly information to Congress, where, on the basis of past experience,
it is likely to be buried?
by exposing its existence to a wider public on this website, are we not
helping to make it essentially IMPOSSIBLE for the Legislative Branch to
turn a blind eye any longer to the organised criminality that is
herewith identified inside the named US structures, to ignore the
conditions for monumental breaches of US national security they have
yielded and will continue to generate, and to disregard the associated
gross TREASON consequently perpetrated by the President and the Vice
President of the United States against the American people?
would it not represent a display of criminally feckless weakness and
putrid co-conspiratorial complacency for the appropriate action against
these criminals to be delayed ANY LONGER?
The curtain rises at the beginning of ‘ACT TWO’....
REMARKS AND CONTEXT
Subject: Halliburton Thefts: News from an ex-CIA Insider:
Bob Chapman, I happened across one of your articles on Halliburton. As
I am in the process of writing to Waxman's Oversight and Reform
Committee some of what I know about Halliburton etc., I will pass on
some of it to you. Please feel free to use it in the interest of the
Sent on Friday 16 May 2008 to:
Chairman Waxman, Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform at http://oversight.house.gov/contact:
you so much for your integrity and work exposing corruption. I
collected intelligence in Iraq and Afghanistan for the CIA until August
2004 when I was outed by Cheney for refusing to make propaganda that
Iran was developing nuclear weapons. My official title within the CIA
was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence.
Since I set up the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon, I
was given a title of Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of
Staff and a rank of a Two-Star General in the US military.
rank was largely a bogus ploy by the Pentagon to get more of my time
from the CIA and force me to attend a Joint Chiefs of Staff Meeting
once a month. I did so from October 2003 to July 2004.
On orders of my boss, DCI George Tenet, in August 2001 I removed a
moving van full of Pentagon
documents showing Defense Contractor kickbacks to Pentagon officials.
I removed them from the Pentagon and they were driven to the CIA.
took me about 10 days of time to get the Pentagon people to turn those
documents over to me en masse. The ethical intelligence methods that I
used to do so are beyond the scope of this text.
CIA's intention turned out not to be to expose and correct the
corruption, but to cover it up, as judged by later events. Clearly I
did not have time to read all of those documents in one week. My job
was not to evaluate those documents and address the corruption: it was
to run a counter-intelligence type of op. to collect them.
I did become aware of the depth of corruption during the course of that
week and did read some of them. It is amazing what ended up in print
because people in the Pentagon felt so immune from prosecution,
especially under Mr Bush Jr. in the White House. The main reason for
collecting those documents, I believe in retrospect, was to allow CIA
analysts to evaluate how to take business away from other US Defense
Contractors and give it to Halliburton and
[Editor: How this was done si
relate din detail below].
‘WAR IS COMING BECAUSE THE BUSH FAMILY WILL MAKE BILLIONS FROM IT’
mood at the CIA and Pentagon was: war is coming because the Bush Family
stands to make billions from it: so get ready. I did come across
reports later which confirmed that the documents had been used in that
fashion. That is, they were used to blackmail Pentagon officials into
'working on' on the Halliburton-Carlyle team, or to judge how much to
bribe them to switch to that team. So,I am afraid, in retrospectively
thinking about it, that my actions led to worse, not less, corruption.
Certainly that corruption did not serve the US public nor our country's
national security interests.
TENET: 'THOSE DOCUMENTS WILL MAKE ME RICH'
want to mention a conversation that I had with DCI Tenet after giving
him these documents. The moving van full of them had just arrived at
the CIA's headquarters in Langley. Tenet laughed and said to me ‘You
have just given me the keys to the Kingdom’. I guess that I was a bit
dense, as I did not grasp immediately what he meant. So, I asked him
‘How?’ He said to me in front of McLaughlin, the Deputy Executive
Director (both of whom I knew rather too well at the time), ‘Those
documents will make me rich’.
Horrified that he might
fence them on the black market for cash I replied: ‘How dare you sell
them to the Russians’. I believe that some of the documents that I
brought back from the Pentagon did get sold to the Russians later to
make a buck.
UNVETTED HALLIBURTON AND CACI STAFF WORKING INSIDE THE CIA
the officer had investigated suspicious fiddling of work rosters which,
to sum up, ensured that only personnel ‘on the take’ were handling
Halliburton deliveries...] a CIA official knocked on my office door.
That was unusual as there was bold black lettering on the door that no
one should knock without the permission of the DCI. That notice had
been put up by Tenet because he was
tired of people taking up my
time. He wanted it all to himself and his chores. The man then barged
in without waiting for a reply from me and stated loudly that I had now
been called off looking into supply problems at the Pentagon, not
supply problems to the troops.
Since the person I had emailed (details omitted) was in the
next office, presumably it was for their ears that he was speaking so
loudly. He then shut the door and walked off, again without waiting for
a reply from me. That man was indeed someone I recognized.
the CIA we jokingly called him 'Halliburton's Representative to the
CIA'. Like his counterpart at the Pentagon, he handled all of the
delivery problems for Halliburton products arriving at the CIA. He was
paid by the CIA a salary, just like that Pentagon man.
after looking into their backgrounds I could find no evidence that
either had been hired by the CIA or the military through their
personnel depts. Neither had done military training or been trained at
‘the Farm’ as a spy.
The more I looked into that, which I had
not been called off of, the more curious it became. Finally, one day
months later I knocked on the Halliburton's Representative to the CIA's
office door. I was surprised when it opened to find not the office of a
single man but a whole section of offices. I had worked at the CIA for
over 30 years and thought I knew it inside and out.
a new section had been added onto the other side of that door. Over 40
people worked in it and they were all working for Halliburton while
being paid by the US taxpayer as if they were CIA. I checked that
carefully. The CIA's Human Resources Department had no files on them.
It had never interviewed them for the job. IT HAD NEVER VETTED THEM.
The CIA had a back door in its security ...... created to let
Halliburton put anyone they wanted into the hallways of the CIA.
OUTRAGEOUS, CATASTROPHIC ONGOING BREACHES OF U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY
was an outrageous violation of US national security. And this was after
9/11 and the terrorism scare. I immediately reported it to Tenet and he
said ‘Yes, I know’. I checked with the Head of CIA building security
and he admitted that he knew too. I asked him what he was going to do
He said ‘Keep my
mouth shut so I can stay alive and I suggest you do the same’. That
sounded like a threat to me, even though indirectly worded. I asked him
who would kill me if I talked about it.
He hemmed and hawed a
bit. I asked him if he would try to kill me if I talked about it. He
said no but others would. I went fishing and asked: Do you think
Halliburton will kill me for it? He didn't reply. Then I asked ‘Will
the CIA?’ He said; ‘Not likely, you are inside the CIA’. Then I asked: 'Will CACI'? At that, he
agreed that they would likely try in defense of their sister
I asked him if CACI had their own back door into the CIA so that I
should be afraid of them while I was inside the CIA. He acknowledged
that they did. [Details of the CACI 'backdoor' are not revealed in this
exposure but will doubtless form part of the further evidence being
dumped on Congress: Ed.].
THE PATRIOTIC LONG-TERM CIA OFFICER CONFRONTS TENETCROOK TO HIS FACE
back to my knocking on the Halliburton company offices at the CIA. A
security guard there immediately asked me for my Halliburton ID. When I
did not have one, he asked me if I had an appointment to see someone. I
mentioned the name of the man who knocked on my door and that man came
out to greet me. He invited me into his office. The furniture in it was
better than the DCI had upstairs, though this was on the ground floor.
We chit-chatted a few minutes and then I got down to business. I asked
him if Halliburton intended to short the troops on their supplies on
purpose, or was incompetent. By then I had the evidence in my office
that Halliburton was shipping only half of its invoice contents in many
of its cartons [which was what this veteran officer had been
investigating previously: Ed.]. That was true in the war zones as well.
It had set up the same corrupt system of swing shift receivers
[i.e., ensuring that only key corrupt personnel were used to handle
Halliburton goods, which was done by rigging the work rotas: Ed.] on at
least three continents. They received the cartons and signed that the
goods well all received properly. Then the shortages later were chalked
up to thefts or war damage, etc.
looked at me awhile before he replied. Then he said: ‘I know nothing
about it. I then laid copies of some of the documents that I had on his
desk that proved that Halliburton was doing this. He said he would look
into it and called security to usher me out of the office.
that day (it was after Christmas in 2001) I reported to Tenet that I
had found evidence that Halliburton was short-shipping to the Pentagon
and the war zones. He at first said, ‘That is nothing new’. And then,
realizing that he had just admitted knowing about it without correcting
it said, ‘Have a report about it on my desk before Christmas'. He had
been saying that probably for weeks and now, under the stress of my
asking him about this corruption, he inappropriately persevered that
comment. Christmas had passed about 3 days before, at the very least.
When he caught that mistake a moment later, he admitted: ‘I just can't
get rid of that problem’.
I then asked him what he had tried to do about it.
did not reply. Instead he sent me to speak to another man he said that
he had put to work on the problem. Yes, you guessed it correctly: he
sent me to speak to Halliburton's Representative to the CIA. I had just
come from his office that morning and I said so.
ignorant of the fact that the man worked for Halliburton. I reminded
Tenet that I had been asked to show my Halliburton ID to even get to
his office. He offered to call down there to make sure I could get in
when I went. I told him that it was his responsibility to correct
Halliburton's short-shipping and its invasion of the CIA, not
Halliburton’s. He said that he couldn't because his hands were tied
behind his back by the White House. I made a mock walk around to the
other side of him to look for his hands tied behind him and said: ‘That
is not what I see’. He said: ‘There is nothing I can do about it’. I
picked up his phone and handed it to him and said: ‘You can start by
calling Congress, the FBI, and the New York Times. They would believe
you, if you did so’.
He declined to make those calls. I told him that the head of the CIA
should be a man of courage.
But he never did make the calls. I went to my office and started making
I faxed the documents I had over to the GAO [General Accounting, now
Accountability, Office]. I needed to have copies of them outside of my
office before it got raided. They were not national security secrets:
they were Halliburton short-shipping papers. One of them was even a
memo on Halliburton stationery discussing the short-shipping policy and
how well it was working to make profits for the corporation.
I called the GAO to make sure that they received the documents, they
checked them carefully to make sure that they were all legible. There
were over 100 pages of documents and it took them a while. After they
finished they agreed to look for the GAO investigator who had come out
to speak to me before [details omitted here: Ed.].. But before they
could get him on the phone to me, there was a knock at my door and in
barged Halliburton's Representative to the CIA.
[Now read what happened next... Ed.]:
FLUNG INTO HALLIBURTON’S OWN JAIL CELL BENEATH ITS OFFICES INSIDE THE
yanked my phone out of the wall. Then he had his security guards
ransack my office and take every shred of paper out of it. Then he had
me bodily hauled off to a prison cell located inside the Halliburton
offices at the CIA. It was in the basement there. There I was
intimidated and my life was threatened. I wondered if it would be
occurred to me that the CIA head of building security might not know
that Halliburton had its own torturers and assassins. I decided to
cooperate. I promised not to investigate Halliburton for the rest of
the year. I figured that I could keep my promise for the 2 days left in
the year. Somehow they accepted my promise and let me go.
immediately went up to Tenet's office and complained and showed him the
bruises that they had given me. He said: 'There, there, everything will
be alright in the morning'.
That was not true. Halliburton was
still stealing the US taxpayer's dollars in the morning and the troops
were still going without. But at that time I was too tired to fight any
more that day. I decided to put myself in a place that I could keep my
promise and requested leave to fly back to my home in California. Tenet
agreed and I managed to get out of the building without further
incident. I believe that the GAO still has the documents that I sent
them buried in its files.
started an investigation into it and then it was interrupted. But I
believe that they are willing to go forward with the investigation now,
if asked to do so. I believe that your asking them to do it would be
enough to accomplish that. The GAO has done a lot of good work. You
could write a letter to its Head and ask them to restart that
CHENEY, ON BEHALF OF HALLIBURTON, ROUTINELY BARKED ORDERS AT TENET
was not true that Cheney stopped running Halliburton [when he took
office].That is a complete myth. He called in orders to the man I
worked for [Tenet: Ed.] almost every day and sometimes twice or more
times a day. He remained the functional head of it in all but name. No
one at Halliburton had the power to override his orders. Second, it is
not true that he divested himself of the profits of the
company. He merely hid how they got to him through a series of shell
veteran CIA officer then explained how in detail how to compare the
‘creative’ accounting software and methodology employed by Halliburton,
the CIA and the Pentagon, from which it was possible to identify how
the massive ongoing frauds, designed to extract illegal profits out of
the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars, were/are perpetrated: Ed.].
CHENEY EMPLOYS FELONS INSIDE THE CIA AND THE PENTAGON
Halliburton rigs a Back Door in the Pentagon Accounting Computer:
was brought to my notice that Halliburton had already come to the
attention of a Government investigator. We have already seen that
Halliburton had both overbilled and short-shipped. The buyer was the
helpless taxpayer. The investigator worked inside the GAO and had
access to both Halliburton's bills and [to] the Pentagon's payment of
those bills. But there was a problem. Those bills and the payments did
not match up. In spite of the bills being grossly inflated in the first
place, the payments exceeded the bills! That was not by a little, it
was by about 35%.
GAO INVESTIGATOR MADE FULLY AWARE OF THESE ORCHESTRATED SCAMS
GAO investigator was the same man who had come to talk to me in my
office. He remembered me and that I had tried to contact him at the end
of 2001. So, he had asked to speak to me by calling the CIA. The CIA
would not let my phone ring whenever he called [thereby covering up its
ongoing complicity with Halliburton in these scams designed to ‘milk
the wars’: Ed.].
But by happenstance one of the many times he
tried to call me I picked up the phone to try to call someone else. So,
we connected. I agreed to meet with him outside of the CIA and later
that same day we met at a restaurant in Mclean, not far from CIA
Headquarters. He had with him copies of all of the materials that I had
faxed over to him. He started by asking me questions on them and taking
notes. He was particularly interested in documenting where I had picked
up each document. Then he asked me what I knew of the Pentagon
overpaying Halliburton. It had been two weeks since the CIA's creative
accounting department had alerted me to that problem. By then I knew a
great deal about how that Pentagon overbilling occurred.
HALLIBURTON OFFICES SET UP INSIDE THE PENTAGON, TOO
had let Halliburton set up offices inside the Pentagon just like Tenet
had let [Halliburton] set them up at the CIA. That was the result of
secret Executive Orders signed by Bush, Jr. [Editor: In other words,
this organised criminal operation was explicitly authorised by
criminalist President George W. Bush Jr. from the outset, who is
accordingly being fingered by this courageous former top CIA officer as
being vulnerable to the charge of treason, on the basis of these
findings ALONE(irrespective of the innumerable other acts of treason
that he has committed, and that we have identified in these reports].
I had by that time a copy of that Executive
Order [in the singular here: Ed.] and handed it to the GAO investigator
along with many other documents that I brought to that meeting.
National security was being trashed by the Bush Administration and what
I did had the potential to help restore US national security.
None of the documents would have helped the Russians, the Chinese, etc.
wage war against us.
I had had that independently verified by CIA analysts before I handed
over those documents.
the theft of funds would help US national security. One of the
documents that I handed over was the list of Halliburton personnel at
the CIA and at the Pentagon. Their physical offices were together in
each location with their own security personnel. I verified that with
my own eyes the next time I had occasion to go to the Pentagon 20
minutes' drive away. In addition, I handed over a document that listed
their job titles from their CIA or Pentagon badge application which is
all that personnel in those locations had on them. Even a visitor to
the CIA had to fill out such a form. The amount of checking on that
person's background to get that badge is a call or fax to the FBI to
make sure that they are not on a wanted list. The CIA also checks their
name and Driver's License against its 'suspected foreign agents' and
after 9/11 its 'suspected terrorists' list.
no-one called to verify that they were not felons who had served their
time [in jail] already. Thus, when I checked, I found that
‘Halliburton's Representative to the CIA’ [the man who had flung the
officer into the cell, after ripping the phone from the wall: Ed.] who
was then already my boss for 10 hours a week [in a curious twist not
covered here: Ed.]. was a felon who had served time on a
felony conviction of fraud.
CIA-BASED HALLIBURTON FELON PARTNERED BY PENTAGON-BASED HALLIBURTON
unsurprisingly, then, one of the top men at Halliburton's Pentagon
Suite was his partner in that crime who had also been convicted of a
felony. The crime in question was stealing new vehicles bought by the
US Army in large numbers while they were en route to be delivered to
had then been sold overseas and the profits pocketed [in an exact
replay of what went on in the ‘former’ Soviet union after the fake
‘collapse of Communism: Ed.]. His Pentagon badge listed him as an
'accountant'. I could find no evidence that he had been to business
school unless one counted his jail time as that. His resume that I
found elsewhere where he served on a board as a Director on a company,
listed a business school during the time he spent in prison, about 4
I called up that business school and asked if they had
a 'prison outreach program'. They said no. I asked them if they had a
graduate by that name and they declined to comment. But when I faxed
them a copy of the man's resume on CIA letterhead saying that he was
posing as a graduate of their school they issued a denial that he had
gave all those papers to the investigator. Then I gave him the proof
that Halliburton's own CEO, Cheney, had known that they were felons by
the fact that he had blocked a background check on them when they went
to a White House function that he hosted. In addition, I gave that
investigator the proof in the format of several documents together,
which showed that this Halliburton felon posing as an accountant had
caused the Pentagon to overpay Halliburton [huge sums of money].
CHENEY DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN EMPLOYING AND INSTRUCTING PENTAGON FELON
evidence that that Halliburton felon was the man responsible for the
overpayments by the Pentagon consisted of four elements:
First off, I had a memo from Cheney to him that was handwritten in
Cheney's hand and addressed to him personally which directed him to
make sure that the Pentagon pays us all that it owes us and then some.
The memorandum appeared to have been hand-delivered. The CIA's internal
forgery department verified the note as Cheney's handwriting and not a
forgery. I try to do careful work.
So their statement to that fact was a document that I handed over with
the original of that memo.
The next piece of evidence was a letter sent by that felon to a friend
and co-conspirator, in this case my Halliburton boss. In that letter he
bragged: ‘I am getting more than we bargained for out of the Pentagon’.
It went on to encourage him to meet him to 'find out how'. I
intercepted this letter before it got to my Halliburton boss, copied it
and then put it onto his desk. I was thus witting to the fact that they
were going to discuss that topic at their next meeting.
• The third piece of evidence was a tape
of their conversation at that meeting. On that tape the
felon bragged with delight about how gullible people were at the
Pentagon. He spoke about his going into the Accounting Department of
the Pentagon and making friends with some of them. About how he managed
to bring his own programmer in to check the bills from Halliburton on
the excuse that they had not been paid on time.
programmer had managed to insert code by calling up the Halliburton
computer from the Pentagon's Accounting Computer to check if all the
outstanding bills had been paid. That code put in a back door into the
Pentagon's Accounting Computer, so that Halliburton could later change
the amount that the Pentagon would pay whenever they wanted.
reason that Halliburton had been caught was that someone forgot to
change their billings up to what they had put in the Pentagon's
• The fourth piece of
evidence that I gave him was my boss having one of his programmers
insert that same code into the CIA's Accounting computer. I waited
until he did it and then I collected the evidence, the code. The code
from the CIA's Accounting Computer with a couple of lines before and
after it to show where it had been inserted was the fourth piece of
evidence. That evidence was on a computer disc. I had one of the
accounting people sign it as coming from their computer.
had first taken all that evidence to my boss, Tenet, to give him a
chance to correct the problem of Halliburton ripping off the American
taxpayer via the CIA and Pentagon. He looked at the evidence and said
‘Well, you certainly have done a thorough job as usual’. Then he
offered to despatch the evidence over to the White House to 'correct
I immediately picked up the evidence off his
desk and, walking out of his office, said that I could do that myself.
I did send a copy of the evidence to the White House. I did that after
I met with the GAO official. The White House managed to block the
RUMSFELD AND BUSH PERSONALLY FINGERED MAKING MONEY OUT OF WAR SCAMS
following section needs to be read as presented because to omit any
segment loses the thread and might jeopardise understanding of how the
kickbacks were orchestrated:
Was Rumsfeld Criminally Negligent in Protecting US Troops and national
is another case that grew out of my moving documents from the Pentagon
to the CIA on DCI Tenet's orders in August 2001... It was brought to my
attention by a Colonel at the Pentagon who handed me a stack of
documents ON THE CONDITION THAT I WOULD READ THEM THAT NIGHT.
was a pretty big stack, over an inch high. It took me until 4 am in the
morning before I had a firm grasp on the case he had handed me. Since I
was in an office at the Pentagon, it was easy for me to immediately
start investigating it. The hour was late, but that was a good time to
look for and collect the computer files and other documents that I
wanted to go with the Colonel's documents. By THE morning, I had had no
sleep, but I had collected much evidence, and laid it in the inbox the
desk of the Pentagon's Criminal Investigation Unit's Head.
amount of evidence was over two inches high of documents and four
computer discs, one of which was from the Accounting Office. The
Colonel who had handed me that case then spent all morning in that
office giving that Head his eye-witness testimony with regard to the
matter. That testimony covered only one fourth of the case, and I sent
in another three Pentagon officials in the afternoon to flesh the rest
of the case out. Having the rank of a Two-Star General was essential to
that effort. It would not have happened had I not out-ranked the Head
of the Criminal Investigation Unit at the Pentagon, as he was loath to
investigate. It would also not have happened had I not also personally
breathed down his neck repeatedly during the day, by going in person to
check how he was doing. Each time I came by, I insisted that he give me
a full briefing on his investigations so far. I did that four times
during the course of the day. I did not dictate the content of his
investigation, but I did insist that he be vigorous in pursuing it. I
mention this practical framework of the case because I am mainly
interested in the larger issue that these cases were not getting
Colonel giving me the case had been over to that Criminal Investigation
Unit several times previously to file complaints. He was never
satisfied that they were investigated. I was now able to confirm that.
Each time the investigations were dead-ended. It was clear to me by the
end of the day that the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Pentagon was
professionally dedicated to covering up corruption, not investigating
or correcting it. [That's what it was FOR: Ed.].
POSSIBILITY OF FOREIGN PENETRATION OPS INVESTIGATED
I later took some steps to make sure that this was not due to Russian,
Chinese, or other foreign
interventions liable to harm US national security. That I DID have a
mandate to do from the CIA,
wherever I went on assignment. That mandate had been put in place by an
Executive Order of
President Clinton. It could not be over-ridden except by a duly elected
HIGH-LEVEL CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TAXPAYER
I had some discretion to act outside of the direct orders of the
Director of CIA, Tenet, or the Chief of the JCS. But I could not press
this beyond the limits at which it would break due to political
In the process of that investigation of possible foreign influence
behind the corruption, I ran across a wide-reaching high-level
conspiracy to defraud the US taxpayer. I will be delineating that
further in this series of about 12 cases.
THE DEFECTIVE SAUDI-BUILT GUN THAT JUMPED TO THE LEFT WHEN FIRED
documents that the Colonel had handed me were on the development and
purchasing of a new free-standing artillery unit. The weapon, a piece
of artillery, did not function as well as an older brand and it was
dangerous to use. Two men had died during the testing of it. But the
Pentagon kept on ordering it. The Colonel knew that the problem had to
be kickbacks, as there was no other rational explanation for what was
But without that proof, the case was had been
repeatedly closed as ‘unfounded'. He did not have the espionage
background needed to be able to collect that evidence. As a result he
was stymied. By morning I had been able to lay financial transactions
on the top of the inbox. They showed that at least two Generals had
accepted kickbacks straight into their US bank accounts from that
(Saudi) company. Those transactions occurred in the week after they
voted to buy more of those artillery pieces. The amounts of the
transactions were large relative to their salaries, which is how the
CIA gages the effectiveness of bribes.
amount greater than 15% of a person's monthly salary is almost certain
to have swayed their decisionmaking processes. In each case, the amount
of the transaction was more than the General
made in a single month. A CIA officer accepting that amount of money
from the KGB or a foreign
source would likely have had a bullet put through his body by the CIA,
or been tried for treason.
Yet, at the Pentagon these kinds of actions were largely tolerated, as
if they did not undermine
security. In order to fight a war effectively the equipment has to work
and be safe to use. Selling a secret a foreign power might or might not
make a difference in the outcome of a war; not having good equipment
was sure to make a difference.
GENERALS RECEIVED KICKBACK MONEY PAID FROM A FOREIGN BANK
this case, the company making the artillery was a foreign (Saudi: see
below) company and the Generals had been paid from a foreign bank. It
certainly should have raised a red flag in anyone's mind. The CIA
should have immediately been called in to investigate. But they had not
months, previously the Colonel had put in a complaint to Rumsfeld about
the sheer lack of investigation by the Pentagon's Criminal
Investigation Unit on this case. In it he had cited the fact that the
company making the artillery was a foreign one and raised the issue as
to whether it was a
deliberate attempt to sabotage US national security by selling them
had asked Rumsfeld refer the matter to the CIA. That had not happened.
By the afternoon, I had the financial records to show that FIVE
Generals had received sizeable kickbacks from that foreign
in the week after the vote to place the order. In addition, I had the
signed confession of one of those men. I did not use threats or torture
to get it. I did use friendly persuasion. Not only did he confess, but
he admitted in writing that there was a conspiracy to ensure that that
got the kickbacks. They had met not just once, but at least twice to
conspire on how to ensure that the order went through. Rumsfeld had
cancelled a competing meeting that had dealt
with national security issues, without explanation. That allowed two
further Generals to attend the
second meeting. There were six Generals at that second meeting, if I
SIX CORRUPT GENERALS RESIGN QUIETLY
next day they quietly resigned in the face of the investigation. One of
them told me privately but refused to put it in writing that Rumsfeld
had cancelled the competing meeting 'in order for us to organize and
get that artillery approved' for Pentagon purchasing. The next day,
that Colonel brought me ten similar cases, since I had solved that one
to his great satisfaction. It was my last day
at the Pentagon on the assignment to pick up the documents Tenet
ordered me to collect.
FOREIGN COMPUTERS WITH BUGS SOLD INTO THE PENTAGON FOR KICKBACKS
did not have time while at the Pentagon to solve them, so I undertook
to mentor the Colonel in how to collect the evidence of the bribes.
During the course of that day he managed to collect
evidence well enough to resolve one of those ten cases ad hoc. The
guilty party also quietly
resigned. He, too, had been bribed by a foreign company. At least, in
that case, the product
worked. It was not a case of the Pentagon ordering the product. It was
a case of him selling
them on the black market from his office inside the Pentagon to other
product was a foreign (Japanese) lap-top computer. Military secrets
were almost sure to be put on them given the location that they were
sold into. They had not been vetted by the Pentagon to ensure that they
did not have a back door on them to allow the files, conference calls,
within range of them, etc. to be transmitted back to that foreign
country. They were popular at the
for their advanced conference video call capacities. I took one of
these computers back to the CIA with me, where it was verified that the
laptop did have the function of acting just like an
advanced bug to steal files, audio, and photographic images.
optics on it were advanced enough to read documents off the desk of and
wall behind the user! It automatically turned itself on and focused on
text. Even before I verified that the laptop had been designed to steal
military secrets, it was clear from the outer circumstances that that
was likely to be the case. Otherwise, why not sell it into some other
location? The laptop cost a lot more with those advanced spy systems on
it than a regular user could afford. That was why it was only offered
for sale inside the Pentagon: the foreign country was paying so that it
could be sold very
cheaply and would out-compete other laptops at the Pentagon.
RUMSFELD BLOCKS INVESTIGATIONS: GREEN LIGHT FOR CONTINUED CORRUPTION
500 of those [foreign, specially equipped] laptops had already been
sold at the Pentagon. The Colonel had pressed the Criminal
Investigation Unit to investigate those black market sales.
had not done so, nor had the matter been referred to the CIA for
investigation. The Criminal Investigation Unit was not willing to press
charges even after being presented with the evidence that the Pentagon
official had taken a foreign bribe. I could not press the issue any
further because Rumsfeld had overruled me. He had already sent the Head
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) down to the Criminal Investigation
Unit's Head to tell him not to prosecute the six Generals.
I had called Rumsfeld while he was in his office to protest [but] he
had refused to take my call.
Rumsfeld nixed actual prosecution of our cases but we still managed to
get the resignations.
Rumsfeld blocking the prosecutions gave an ongoing green light to
corruption at the Pentagon.
I did collect the evidence that Rumsfeld sent General Shelton, the
Chief of the JCS, down to
prevent the prosecution of the six Generals. I collected a copy of
Rumsfeld's phone call to
Shelton. In addition, I collected the security camera evidence that
General Shelton promptly
down and talked to the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit. The
action that the Head took in not prosecuting the six Generals or the
laptop-selling official speaks for itself as the evidence.
addition, I collected evidence that that Head of Criminal
Investigations had not prosecuted a number of other corruption cases in
which the evidence of guilt was very abundant and solid. Furthermore, I
had collected a van load of corruption related documents which proved
that corruption was widespread at the Pentagon.
My orders from Tenet were to deliver those documents to the CIA. There
was nothing in those
orders that prevented me from xeroxing as many of them as I could xerox
without delaying that
delivery past the time that Tenet had requested delivery. I had been in
the espionage business
collecting documents for over thirty years. When doing so will aid
national security, one has a
duty to collect them and try to deal with them in a way that
accomplishes that objective. It should
therefore not surprise anyone, that I had ALL of them xeroxed during
the course of the 10 days
that they were collected. That is, although it was clear to me that I
could not get the corruption
appropriately dealt with at the Pentagon, I still had hopes that one
day I'd be able to somewhere
succeed. There were a number of moving vans removing documents from the
Pentagon on that
day. I had already stated that this was only one of three categories
that Tenet ordered me to
collect. I thus had the cover to load one van full of the copies of the
WHITE HOUSE, TENET, RUMSFELD, JUSTICE, FBI BLOCKED INVESTIGATIONS
The question was where to send it to get the corruption cases
prosecuted. I did not have a good
answer to that. I sent it to an Army base where I trusted the integrity
of the army commander to
secure it, until I did have a good answer to that. It is still intact
at that Army base.
cases, many of them, have grown old. But as I looked into the matter of
how to get them prosecuted, the facts were not encouraging. The White
House was against it. My boss Tenet was against it. Rumsfeld was
against it. The Head of the Joint Chifs of Staff was against it and the
later replacement was not for it, either.
Department had not investigated the obvious Halliburton corruption and
put them out of business and some of their personnel in prison, as it
should have done, on the evidence.
Before I left the Pentagon I sent that
evidence by courier to the Director of the FBI. Mr Rumsfeld's
corruption was happening in the United States and it was within the
jurisdiction of the FBI, not the CIA to follow through on it. When the
FBI did not act to enforce the law appropriately, that was more
evidence of a conspiracy at levels above Rumseld to allow corruption.
That artillery case should still exist in the files of the Pentagon.
That case is relevant evidence in the larger case of whether the US
Administration is criminally negligent in not prosecuting corruption
cases. I allege that it is, and that its failure to do so has led to
the death of US troops from faulty and shoddy equipment.
two men who died in the testing of that artillery [piece] should not
have died. Earlier tests of the artillery had shown that it 'jumped' to
the left when fired, nearly 20% of the time. It was a very heavy piece
of equipment. On the earlier tests it had injured about 25 men and sent
a handful of them to the hospital. When the heavy gun jumped as the man
looked through the sighting, it had caused brain concussions and
knocked men unconscious.
serious injuries were the result of the artillery falling over onto the
person firing it. In one of those incidents the artillery piece had
caused massive haemorrhaging into the soft tissue of the leg. The man
had had to be hospitalized. If I remember correctly, he had had to
undergo emergency surgery to repair a rupture to his femoral artery.
That crush injury to his artery was so severe that in the medical
report I read the surgeons had considered amputating the leg.
evaluated the artillery and decreed it 'unsound'. They cited that it
was poorly designed and poorly manufactured. It was made in a foreign
country where manufacturing processes were substandard as a general
rule. They had written that the artillery piece was unstable on its
base even when not being fired. And they had speculated that it jumped
to the left because the quality control at the factory was so poor,
that the bore was not straight. There was not a single reason, not even
a cheap price, to recommend it for purchase by the Pentagon, based upon
the objective evidence that I read. Yet the testing of it were
continued, even after it was clear that it was shoddy equipment and
unsafe. That happened because obvious corruption was not corrected.
DEFECTIVE ARTILLERY PIECE MADE BY PART OF THE CARLYLE GROUP
The maker of the artillery piece was part of the Carlyle Group. That
was a clear conflict of
interest for a sitting President to be making money from weapons that
were being sold to
the Pentagon. It was not until I returned to the CIA that I was able to
confirm that the US
Administration was making money off the sale of that defective
PAYMENTS CHANNELLED VIA CIA SHELL COMPANIES FOR BUSH, RUMSFELD ACCOUNTS
money made from the sales of the artillery item had a pathway to the
Bush accounts. It took me longer to collect the banking records which
linked the sale of the weapons to the Pentagon, to the exact payment
amount into the Bush accounts. It was while I was writing software to
query the CIA's creative accounting computer that I came across the
transactions. CIA shell companies were used to hide the funnelling of
the money from the artillery manufacturer to Bush's accounts: 9.6% of
the Pentagon's payment for the defective artillery piece ended up in
President George W. Bush Jr.'s private accounts. About 2.4% ended up in
Rumsfeld had, according to the Pentagon
documents that I later obtained, taken several steps that indicated
that he knowingly endangered the men's lives. His signature was on a
memorandum that directed many more of the artillery pieces to be
ordered and 'retested', even though one man had already died from being
crushed beneath it when it jumped to the left. If I remember correctly,
the number ordered was 1,000. It certainly seemed excessive for testing
purposes, given that nearly 20% of the previous batch had ‘jumped' to
the left. The sight for the artillery piece was on the left, so there
was no way to reasonably fire it without being at risk of bodily harm.
FAULTY EQUIPMENT DEATH COVERED UP: DEATH CERTIFICATE FORGED
was clear that Rumsfeld already knew about the first death; for he had
signed a previous memo ordering people not to talk about it. In
addition, he had taken steps to ensure that the first death was not
properly investigated. I had been told by a Pentagon official who
overheard it that Donald Rumsfeld had told a member of his staff to
list the death as an ‘Off-Duty’ death. The official was one of the
three I sent in the afternoon to give his statement. Further proof of
that reality was that the form was signed by a member of Rumsfeld's
office. Normally, that form should have been signed by the dead
soldier's Commanding Officer. Rumsfeld had the power to override that
long-established standard operating procedure, but his staffer signing
that form did not.
Since that form should have been signed by a Commanding Officer and the
staffer was not one,
it appeared that Mr Rumsfeld did not sign it, in order to avoid having
his name attached to that
blatant lie. When I checked the Death Certificate, it listed the cause
of death as MVA (for Motor
Vehicle Accident). Yet, many military officers had been at the test and
in the record of the test
they had written that this man had been crushed under the artillery
piece. It also recorded that
he had been sent to the hospital. I verified that the hospital received
him from the ambulance
shortly after the test and that he died at the hospital soon
Death Certificate appeared to be a forgery or faked as it was dated two
days after the hospital records showed that he died. Also I could not
find a physician by the name of the signatory of the death certificate
at that hospital. There was a physician by that name in the United
States; he only worked inside the Pentagon. He was the physician who
attended Rumsfeld whenever he was sick inside the Pentagon, but not
when he was outside the Pentagon. The man who died was stationed on a
base in another state: if I remember correctly, in Maryland at Edgewood
was no record of his ever being inside the Pentagon: so the Death
Certificate thus appeared to have been signed at the Pentagon with that
cause of death per Donald Rumsfeld's orders. That evidence strongly
suggested that Rumsfeld tried to cover up the death of the first man as
having been due to that artillery piece's defects... The artillery
piece was manufactured by a Saudi Arabian company with close business
ties to the Bush Family.
DEFECTIVE FOREIGN EQUIPMENT AND FOREIGN PENETRATION FOR PROFIT
Saudi Arabian company were having financial trouble because they could
not find a market for their products. Their products had a bad
reputation in the Defense Industry. A video clip I watched at the CIA
which showed their table set up at an outdoor Defense Contractor's
Weapon Expo held in Saudi Arabia, showed that people purposely avoided
stopping to look at their table. It was not a subtle finding. The table
next to theirs was doing a brisk business. I allege that Rumsfeld knew
the poor reputation of this company when he placed the order for about
1000 more of these defective artillery pieces. The Pentagon keeps lists
of its preferred companies, and of companies to avoid purchasing from.
That company was on the Pentagon's list to avoid. Rumsfeld had to sign
a 'waiver' in order to make that purchase of the artillery that killed
that second man. That, in my opinion, was criminal negligence. And it
was criminal negligence in which he personally took a kickback.
TENET WAS NOT INTERESTED IN THE NATIONAL SECURITY IMPLICATIONS
to the laptop case, the company making it was Japanese. The case is
quite troubling in light of the violation of US national security. Mr
Rumsfeld, by not investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, left
the Pentagon open to any agent of a foreign power with money in their
pocket. Thus his actions which disabled US national security in
practice had both active and passive components....
brief my boss, DCI Tenet, on my findings above after I had determined
their national security implications. He showed no great interest in my
presentation and rushed off in the middle of it.
my invitation to reschedule that briefing twice. It was clear that he
had no intention of seriously trying to correct the problems, even as
they related to the foreign penetration issues at the Pentagon.
1000 TOASTERS COSTING $19.95 SOLD TO PENTAGON BY HALLIBURTON FOR $1,891
former high-level veteran CIA aide to Tenet now related a detailed
investigation into a batch of toasters (yes, those breakfast slot
machines that toast bread) which were stolen from a warehouse in
Indiana by operatives employed by a Halliburton subsidiary who were
dressed up as FBI agents, which Halliburton sold to the Pentagon for
In the course of this investigation, the officer
discovered that goods ordered were not examined physically, but that
corrupt ordering was routinely conducted exclusively on the basis of
fabricated, computerised paperwork. In other words, no-one checked the
actual item purchased: they only handled the paperwork. When challenged
in respect of this very low-value toaster, Halliburton personnel
started inventing alibis to the effect that the toasters were
manufactured from titanium and other special materials, which accounted
for their high cost.
The Halliburton-generated list of
component parts for these toasters exceeded 200, whereas when the
investigator had one of the units deconstructed, it was found to
consist of 14 separate tawdry sub-components. This particular
corruption investigation became so complex that at one stage it
interfered materially with an investigation that the officer was
conducting into a mole working for an unfriendly government who was
carrying documents out of the Langley front door every day.
the veteran CIA officer informed Tenet that the investigation into
Halliburton’s fabrications over the toasters was affecting national
security because the urgent necessity of preventing the mole from
stealing more documents was being frustrated daily, he expressed little
interest, being preoccupied only with covering up the Cheney-directed
THE MOLE CASE THAT WAS LESS IMPORTANT THAN THE TOASTER COVER-UP
now move to the section of this report which demonstrates that US
national security has been directly and maliciously compromised as a
specific consequence of this corruption, controlled by
Unterreichsführer Cheney. At the time of this posting, it is
to us that Cheney remains in detention, but it is not known for what he
may be being held, in addition to his serial corruption in blocking the
Settlements. But given that the Editor of this service has been able to
publicise this information, which was sent to him on 25th May, it is
hoped that any intention that may be floated to release him following
the Settlements, or to allow him to resume his post, is squelched
purely on the basis of these allegations. Consider the extreme gravity
of what now follows.
former CIA top-flight aide to Tenet had been devoting a huge amount of
time to investigating, and proving out, the ongoing fabrication of
invoices and related documentation on a massive scale in general, and
the ludicrous toaster scandal in particular, when the extreme,
immediate urgency of investigating the mole (who turned out to be a
Halliburton employee, protected by Mr Cheney: see below) was known at
the highest level (i.e. by Tenet himself): and yet this DCI was
preoccupied with the necessity of covering up internal corruption
controlled by the Cheney and Rumsfeld gang, and condoned by the FBI and
the Justice Department when the United States’ national security was
being severely compromised not least because, knowing about all this
corruption, the Russians had no difficulty in blackmailing Halliburton
employees for their own espionage purposes]:
I want to talk more about the mole problem as it is very relevant to
this case. A mole is a person inside an agency who is acting as a
traitor to give secrets to a foreign power. The motives can vary and
include bribes or blackmail. The CIA knew that it had a mole because it
knew that the
Russian Embassy in Washington D.C. had recorded the news of
just-delivered CIA documents.
I had been assigned by Tenet to investigate who that mole was, starting
just before I was handed
Halliburton factory problem by 'HallCIA' [an investigation connected
with the issue of ‘phantom factories’, a favourite Halliburton scam:
not covered here]. I was then required by Tenet to keep working on the
Halliburton problem until it was finished at about 2 pm. Then I was
exhausted and went home to sleep. The next day I procured that the FBI
with a warrant would raid a flat looking for CIA documents. I was
present at the raid and we recovered the CIA specifications for the
CIA's communication satellite that NASA had just launched into orbit.
That included the security codes for the encryption algorithms which
were set at the time of launch.
The launch took place in the
morning after the FBI DID NOT arrest 'HallCIA' [the CIA veteran's
codename for the Halliburton suspect: Ed.] while I was still forced to
work on Halliburton’s book cooking project. Those security codes meant
that someone could change from the ground the
encryption codes to their
own codes and then listen in to everything the CIA said to its stations
overseas. In essence, it was like inserting a huge bug into the CIA and
all of its stations. It was an
extremely serious violation of US national security, one of the most
serious in the history of the
had it not been caught. It was later verified that although the
documents were recovered, the mole had already faxed those security
codes directly to Moscow soon after the launch.
MOLE WAS AN UNVETTED HALLIBURTON EMPLOYEE: FAXED SATELLITE CODES TO
mole was a Halliburton employee who had never been vetted by the CIA.
The Russians had approached him and offered him money. In addition they
had offered not to expose his criminal background [which they knew all
about: Ed.]. He was clearly a prime candidate for blackmail by the
keeping his job meant having to hide his felony conviction [see above:
Ed.].The CIA had not run a criminal background check on all of these
Halliburton employees: but, of course, the Russians had. The CIA has
rules that prevent it from hiring drug-takers for the same reason; they
are much too high a blackmail risk, and thus a mole risk. Since the CIA
never vetted the Halliburton people, they never even asked them if they
took drugs under a lie detector test like they normally do. And the CIA
never even did drug tests on the Halliburton people.
CHENEY PROTECTS MOLE WHO SOLD THE SATELLITE'S CODES TO MOSCOW
I showed Tenet the documents that I recovered from that Halliburton
operative's flat he was shocked. He immediately called the Director of
the FBI and thanked him for his help in recovering
them. I asked
Tenet to ask the FBI Director to arrest the Halliburton traitor. Tenet
sent me out of the room to discuss it. He called Mr Cheney. Cheney told
him no, that man was his friend and that they could never arrest him.
The phone was on speaker and I heard everything. I cried for my country
that it had been taken over by crooks who were traitors as well. I
could not stand to stay in such a corrupt institution and under such a
grossly corrupt government. That was the moment in 2002 that I decided
to leave my country [the veteran CIA operative fled to Canada]. After
the CIA knew that its new satellite's security codes had been stolen,
it had to figure out what to do now. It decided that it could not use
that satellite because its security had been too compromised. That
satellite cost the US taxpayers over $3.6 billion dollars. It sits in
man responsible for that was the man I called on these pages 'HallCIA'.
I have not used his real name because Cheney threatened to kill me
himself if I ever mentioned his name or the names of his partners in
crime. [This threat was later supplemented by a further direct threat
by Cheney to kill the officer personally, recorded at the end of this
report. It is interesting that Cheney appears to have been in the habit
of threatening to kill his 'enemies' personally, suggesting that this
may not be a new experience for this sinister character: Ed.].
The grim summary just given above reveals that the presence inside both
the CIA and the Pentagon of a Halliburton suite of offices is not just
a gross breach of US national security per se, but has actually been
associated with a penetration and security breach of the gravest
proportions, and that Vice President Cheney, informed of this scandal,
refused to allow the arrest of the mole and has presided over this
quite unprecedented degradation of US security. He is therefore a
traitor to the United States on the basis of that one case alone. What
more evidence is needed?
'DETENTIONS' MUST BE FOLLOWED BY IMPEACHMENT: NO MORE PREVARICATION
only, therefore, have we been justified in stating that the US
Government is run by criminals, but we can now state that there is
every indication that these criminals are directly associated with the
gravest possible breaches of US national security, which clearly
mandates that they should be processed for treason IMMEDIATELY. If Mr
Cheney has been or is being held in the context of the Settlements,
treason should be added to his charge sheet anyway. Under no
circumstances should this man ever be released. Furthermore, his boss
should be taken into custody without further ado.
no use fretting about whether the Republic can stand such an upheaval
as would ensue from pursuing such a course. The United States is robust
and very mature. Now that these exposures are 'happening', the time has
passed for inaction, or brushing these inconvenient realities under the
carpet. The 'failure to confront' can no longer be excused or condoned.
And remember: we have suggested that what is being revealed
here cannot represent more than 1% of what will flood out 'in the
wash'. The Editor recalls the operative, 'working for' Bush Sr., who
said: 'None of this must ever come out, you understand'. Sure, we
stench of corruption has spread around the world and is especially
pongy in Whitehall, which is why the Editor would like to see some
'real consequences' in the United States.
Complacent, corrupt Whitehall bureaucrats might then start to get the
But it gets much worse...
THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals the
criminal background of 'HallCIA', the thug who yanked the officer’s
phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office, had the
officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the basement of CIA
headquarters and on a separate occasion punched holes in the officer’s
office wall, displayed episodes of extreme violence and was observed by
many to be high on drugs. He was also a murderer....
This was the criminal whom Cheney
asserted to be a friend who could never be arrested. This description
leads into a summary of another scam, whereby multiple salaries are
paid into corrupt Halliburton employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:
and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton's main office,
just like the priests sexually abusing children are moved to a
They were never prosecuted...
in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is engaged in an
FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug], He was arrested for FIRST
DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that the FBI officer that
he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper papers and vetting in
the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had fingerprint and DNA evidence
to prove that the Halliburton programmer was the murderer.
They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.
had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the sentence
and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the hospital guard
inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed. Then he
impersonated the guard using his uniform. He later went to a lawyer who
put in a motion to declare the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a
technicality: the defendant had not been present at the reading of the
sentence. The fact that the criminal had committed a second nearly
deadly assault the same day in apparent good health, was omitted from
The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was
on the private flat of 'HallCIA'. It was not at his house where he
lived with a prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file. He did
not keep his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory
people coming through his house.
WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG'S APARTMENT
the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also
illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns, explosives
and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through a wall for
illegal entry. He had one bedroom devoted just to weapons, with shelves
devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs. It was equipped with a
padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn all over the bed, dresser
and floor of the master bedroom.
looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we arrived. The
padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug room and the
door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were still neatly on
the shelves. The flat may have been raided by Russian intelligence
before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents behind as cover-up after
The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the
CIA documents. After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled
in the appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was
doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before
walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in the
FBI uniform.... I told them that I had just tested FBI vetting and
security procedures for a report I was writing for the CIA. I also
explained to them that I had just successfully impersonated an FBI
official to the extent of going on a raid with them, and not one had
yet asked for my name or run it through a background check. I showed
them the CIA top-secret documents the raid had netted and they laughed
at the ruse I had played on the FBI.
were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten that FBI
uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their computers; I was
not yet registered on the records of the FBI.
I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people
involved in that scam. They called
the Director of the FBI and I also spoke to him. He refused to
authorize the arrests.
He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first'. I offered
to drive over immediately with
evidence. He refused to make any time to see me. I immediately faxed
him a short report and enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing
MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they called me
to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now per their
computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the CIA, and the
Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees as their
officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries. Just like
Halliburton over-billed, some Halliburton employees were
THREE US Government salaries; one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI,
and one from the CIA. I wrote in my report that I had signed up in all
three places via Halliburton’s scam to see
how long it would be before those scams were stopped.
put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point was to
use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when those cases
came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money. The Directors
of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I sent those reports
to did not implement my list of recommendations; one of them was to
shut down all of those public salaries going to Halliburton employees.
At least, they had not been implemented as of about Summer 2004 when I
last checked those accounts.
Another recommendation was to
make sure that everyone in those agencies is properly vetted and drug
tested as per that agency’s usual security measures. Because I was
concerned that my clear recommendations would not be acted upon, I
despatched copies of those letters, the forms that I had signed, and
the numbers of the Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering
letter to the GAO I told them that I had given them the authority to
check the balances in those accounts by written authorization to the
I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those
accounts would give them an
to prosecute those cases promptly. Since the banks were not in the
United States, I doubt that coercion applied to the bankers will erase
those accounts, but I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert
CIA person, those communications with officials and the banks were under
aliases. The GAO however has all of the proper information to check
those accounts again and to
prosecute these cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases
and account numbers, so I
access that money even if I wanted to. I never intended to use that
money at all, so I did not record those aliases and numbers into my
In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did
so from within the CIA by pulling up the report that I had written to
the DCI. I have no way to check those accounts now so I do not know
whether that scam, as evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been
stopped. When I checked in 2004, two years had already passed. The US
taxpayer had paid [as follows]: via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each
year, for a total of about $160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00
each year, for a total of $100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about
$80,000.00 each year for a total of about $160,000.00, or roughly
$420,000.00 total into those three Swiss accounts...
also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those employees if
it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was no, except for
rare exceptions. 'HallCIA' had continued receiving a
Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head
Programmer had not.
I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a CIA
salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over 400,
and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon salary,
was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000 salaries
each at, say, $50,000 a year. That would mean that the US taxpayer was
being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent salaries.
Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice President’s
office, that could easily add up to $400 million in savings for
Halliburton in not having had to to pay salaries. No wonder it was so
easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by talking to a
Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had complained to me that
they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA location. They said that
‘the takings are good’, and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a
HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE CONSEQEUENCES
When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the
halls of the CIA, loud alarm
bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were
easiest to carry out were of course its documents.
any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have
top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a counterintelligence
person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The fact that the Head of the
Halliburton section offices at the CIA had just sold the CIA’s
communication satellite encryption security codes to Moscow burned in
The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.
had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that the
Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA for a
price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person inside
the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up for their
cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal salaries, making
the CIA pick up the tab [see above].
One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all
stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in it
for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].
the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd people used to
earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting office print out for me
what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth then dropped open in shock.
Each one of them would have to steal over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets
or goods a year to break even. In some cases the cut in pay was much
higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to
the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40 workers
together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been told that
Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So, about 2
million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would be stolen
from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries stealing.
[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde Conrad,
Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen espionage
cases, omitted here]
February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the
United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union
and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his
betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed. However, he
received a sentence of life imprisonment, and his wife received only a
five-year prison sentence for her conspiracy to commit espionage and
tax evasion as part of a plea bargain by Ames.
TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about third
in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People advance
inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good at what
they do or being very good at lying to please those above them. The
heads of each section were often in the latter category, as a general
rule. I asked him how many secrets the Russians could buy for $2
million a year, if they had 40 moles able to walk the halls of the CIA.
In the posing of the question I explained that the hypothetical moles
would be assumed to be 'efficient' criminals without formal espionage
training. I asked him what effect that would have on national security.
He asked me if this was a conversational gambit or a request for a
formal report to answer my question. I thought about it a moment and
then said the latter.
meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting to Mr
Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety of
important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form that he
needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the assignment given
to him there in black and white. Then he asked me 'Is this about the
Privatized Employees’ invasion of the CIA?' I said yes. He said: ‘I
have been urging Tenet to let us study that risk for months. No go. How
did you get this when I couldn’t?'
I explained to him my method and also that the Head of the
Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s Communication Satellite
Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.
He hadn’t heard
that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within the CIA. I
promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him and a few of
his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had learned. One man was
actually in tears as I finished.
Another said: ‘This marks the
end of US national security’. Another said, “No. US honor died already
and no memo was sent announcing its funeral’.
I asked them what
information they needed to make a proper assessment. They said that it
would help them if I could find out how much the 40 people were
actually making off their thefts inside the CIA, and a list of what
they were stealing. I came back the next day with the list of how much
each one had been paid by Halliburton in ‘bonuses’, which was the code
word for fenced items, and what each ‘bonus’ was for. That list of what
each bonus was for was like what the programmers really did in morphing
an appliance rack into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically
accurate description but it related to the item in a fairly
CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous it
did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations, which
would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further reasons why
he should do so... I called Cheney and begged him to send a memo over
to Halliburton setting up a program to [address these extremely serious
issues]. I even faxed him a memo so that all he had to do was sign to
get that to happen.. He did not deny that Halliburton was selling items
stolen from the CIA. He did not deny that he had the power to impose
the necessary changes at Halliburton by sending the memo. He did not
deny that he had the power to order Tenet to institute effective
measures to stem the tide of the thefts.
the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on the
problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the matter with
I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it
showed that I had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of
the seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that
consequences were the shredding of US national security and the
unnecessary deaths of its covert
I also set up a surveillance operation behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back
to actually inspect each item that Halliburton fenced from the CIA.
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence experience whom
I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to offer to 'help
them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for them'. Call him
Alan for short. A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent me the FBI
uniform, sent me a 'thank you' letter for referring Alan to them. He no
doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a kickback. It was to my
advantage to foster that image of myself without it actually being
true. In my position it was best if everything I did could be
interpreted as corrupt at the same time that I was collecting the
evidence for prosecution.
operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The analysts
and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that was
routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.
We did not
find that out until the Halliburton people realized that they could get
more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods for them. That meant
Alan had to sell them at on average much higher than twice what they
could get for them themselves, even by selling directly to the
Russians. That was not as hard as it would have been with regular
stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know their true worth on
the black market... Alan could make a better profit selling a document
to a rich government such as France, which would have been very bad in
the hands of the poorer Chinese or Russians. Before that, Halliburton
had sold mainly to the Russians. [Editor: Further allegation that
Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].
The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the
hands of the Russians.
had wised up quickly as to our problem and how to assist us. The United
Kingdom was less helpful because they could get that same information
by merely filing a request for it. The French were not as tight into
the CIA, though they were still US allies. We needed top dollar for the
items because we had to make up for the fact that we were not selling
off all of the items due to
their national security risk. We were hiding the fact from
Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back to
OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure that the
Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those had to be
scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure. But it was possible
to send back documents. We had initially thought that it would be only
10% of the items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds.
But as we got a better understanding of what was being sold via
Halliburton, that figure went up to a little over 50%
More damning allegations against Halliburton as a continuing threat to
US national security, for which Cheney should be impeached, along with
Bush Jr., who authorised this corruption via his Executive Orders].
[The high-level operative and source for this information left the CIA for Canada
operatives working inside the CIA to address this catastrophic
situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted people out of
In the process of showing how serious the
security violations were, they revealed the oversight (or
counterintelligence) operation against Tenet and Cheney themselves.
That ended up revealing that they were recovering about 50% of the
items and about 30% of their black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney
of that fact, and Cheney ordered an end to the oversight.
later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all this to
the GAO. The Russians and Mossad had a complete set of White House
calls, including of [calls concerning what was] for sale. The CIA also
had a fairly complete set. When I was forced back into the CIA in Oct.
2003 from Canada with threats and worse, I heard about the troubles
that the oversight people had suffered over the intervening 16 months.
They had been unable to perform oversight for four months.
that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the ex-CIA
operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had hired its own
experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had sold all of the
stolen items without regard to US national security. I then despatched
over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations by Halliburton’s high
officials demonstrating their reckless disregard for national security
and the lives of covert operatives. [Therefore, this information is all
available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately:
But it now gets much, much worse....
THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of the
most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B. Cheney
is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible, given his
Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its own an
only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national security
catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on trying to get
results] managed to get Tenet to insist that Halliburton rehire their
ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people briefed me on [the
catastrophe] as soon as I returned. The first day I came back to the
CIA’s Headquartersm they kept me up all night telling me about it. I
cried many times that night for my country and the harm that had been
done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and
Many, many more intelligence professionals lost
their lives as a consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost
their lives because of the traitorous behaviour of Aldrich Ames. Ames
is serving a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people
were still working at the CIA and stealing there because of Cheney’s
protection of them. They were still walking inside the halls of the CIA
every day and going into its offices to ‘have a chat’.
was such an egregious violation of national security that some
oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we look
like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making a cent
off it... Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will be put in
prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be guilty of
them... We are being treated like criminals because we are trying to
stop the most dangerous of these sales’.
[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].
later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the
oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had to
be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA
suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate
profits. Tenet prohibited the oversight within a week of receiving that
memo. The GAO has a copy of the memo and also of the memo that Tenet
sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone was discovered to have
decreased US corporate profits. They also have the later memorandum
that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened imprisonment if anyone knew about
stolen goods and did not report it to the designated official.
Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon
do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until it is clear
that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent the GAO the
document suggesting this ruse of a new designated official as a way to
stop the oversight. That designated official never prosecuted a case of
theft against a Halliburton person. He came from Halliburton! He had in
fact been recommended for the job by 'HallCIA' to Cheney, who then
recommended him for the job. I sent over to the GAO a tape of the phone
conversation between 'HallCIA' and Cheney. On it. 'HallCIA' says that
the man that he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues 'from
our CIA sales'.
HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA
products’, and says, 'too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was clear
that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton stole from
the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to the CIA. The
designated official was not vetted by the CIA. He was stealing from the
CIA while working out of the Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a
signed statement from a CIA security guard who caught him carrying a
computer of the CIA’s out of the front door. That man could have
employed the back door out of their offices manned only by
Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to stealing from the CIA and
getting away with it that he forgot, and used the front door.
is what he told the guard: 'I forgot... Give me a hand and we’ll take
it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just that. They
helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into their private
cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips of that
CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that
[activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts
that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without it
even cleaning up the problem. By the time I returned to the CIA, 16
people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated
official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the CIA
knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the national
security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened. [Details of
this national security catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic
and disturbing language, now follow].
THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND BUSH
first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead body
lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city. The body had been the teenage
daughter of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable,
even by her father. The body was identified definitively by dental
records. Her face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic
evidence revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during
most of the time that was done to her.
next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body. This
time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were the same.
The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The next sign was
of a US school teacher in Africa. She was divorced and her husband had
once worked for the US State Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under
diplomatic cover, but the CIA refused to comment.
I saw the photographs
of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for words. Could it be that
I was recalled to the CIA against my will in order to get my special
operational skills to track down the villain? The day I got back to the
CIA, the first thing Tenet did was hand me these pictures and ask me to
find The Killer. He had given me the pictures of 23 victims
who had all died the same way. All of them were children of people who
could have been in the CIA. About 22 of them did have a known parent or
guardian in the CIA.
DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the over 100 adults
that had been killed using the exact same modus operandi. One of them
was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment [Editor: did you know that the
CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]. ..The item that was stolen from the
CIA that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer
had not gone through the hands
of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its contents not been thoroughly
took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and written
over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about national
security or the risk to the CIA's covert operatives, if they were
exposed... I was able to prove that it was the same computer. It still
had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of the victims had been
selectively deleted from where they should have been in that list. When
I then compared that file to the CIA's current personnel file, the
comparison program marked those deletions in red. The selective
deletions showed that the owner of the computer was getting tipped off
by someone high up in the investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.
US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders almost
completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up in the
CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had connected the
isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure by the
incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate: Ed.].
motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the guilt
of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86 deletions in
a file of thousands of names. Each deletion was a victim, as already
known by the CIA up to a certain date about two weeks earlier.
ENTER THE 'DARK LORDS': DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point had
failed to be deleted on that stolen computer. The odds of that
happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In
addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary
ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual
tortures and murders. There was many more than one murderer. What they
had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary, quasi-religious
cult. The members
of that paramilitary cult had a group commitment to kill a person once
The Mafia usually only requires its members to kill once to get into
it. This satanic group required their members to kill once a month in
order to remain in good standing in it.
[Note: the Editor of
this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large
number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep demonic
‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment continued
until shortly after we reported the matter to the head of the US
Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to law enforcement
personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts, whereupon they
ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these calls.
in the context of what follows, it would appear that these calls
represented threats: one of these was quite specific, along the lines
of ‘we have the means of dealing with you'. Given the appearance of the
‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is likely that the
Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we suspected, have
responsible for these multiple telephone threats and harassment calls.
comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran CIA
investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment calls
to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails. The
content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was conveyed
immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that (at the date
of this posting) the harassment ceased].
A Manual on how to
‘please the Lord of Darkness’ had been published by a member of that
cult. It recommended that the best way to do it was to torture people
to death using the modus operandi that I have indicated above. That
Manual had been distributed by the owner of the aforementioned computer
with that CIA Personnel file suggested as the targets. The man who
bought the computer was indeed a paramilitary type, with a large
collection of weapons, many of them unregistered... He was identified
as a fundraiser for Bush.
The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as
an emblem [satanic symbolism: Ed.].
The reason that others in the CIA had not tracked him down and had
failed to pin the instigating of the murders on him, was political.
Like 'HallCIA', and the Head Programmer from our earlier cases, he was
well protected. It was not that CIA investigators had not suspected
him. It was that they did not know what to do with their suspicions and
even their evidence after they got it.
I was the booby prize
winner: the fool at the CIA who had before been willing to buck the
silence at great risk to myself. There was precedence for giving me a
job like this. At one point, a CIA officer had sold a list of MI6
officers to the KGB during the Cold War. The KBG had started killing
them off. I was given the job to stop them from continuing. And they
had stopped: whether or not it was due to my efforts, was a matter of
hot debate within the CIA. But some people credited me with having had
some influence in the matter.
individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of Cheney
and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had been
present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA stolen
computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.
‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE
found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The GAO
has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man took
hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to Bush. Bush
hesitated and then handed the money to Cheney. The footage of that
computer being carried out of the room by a guard follows about 20
minutes later. The room had about 20 computers from the CIA in it, to
start with. [They were all neatly laid out, as at a sales
demonstration, for buyers to examine, test, select, and pay for: only
cash was accepted: Ed.].
security camera tape shows Bush Jt. and Mr Cheney repeatedly coming
into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in varying
amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone. Some
prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour exploring the
contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding on a purchase. I
checked with the CIA and found that no CIA vetting of those buyers had
occurred. Most did not have security clearances. Some of them had prior
felony convictions and had been allowed into the White House ‘on orders
from above’. The sale was ‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney
controlling the invitation list.
The earlier tape shows Cheney directing
Halliburton employees in where to set the computers up. Much care and
time was taken to plug them in and connect them to monitors, mice,
keyboards, and to arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each
mouse. The GAO has a copy of that tape too. The manual on how to
torture people (in the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel
was sent overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer
purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed
that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on 'how
to please the Lords of Darkness', and file on them.
records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50% of the
cases where he marked payment received and product and ‘How-to’ sent.
Thirty of the murders had been solved already by local foreign
authorities by the time I was given the case. Of those, the How-to CD
was found in 28 of them. Presumably it had been overlooked in the other
two, or the wrong party may have been charged, or the How-to thrown out
by the criminal.
Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.
BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP (HITHERTO)
At least 168 CIA
officers and their family members
were brutally tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical
corruption run by Bush and Cheney. The CIA [systematically] covered it
all up and pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders. The
notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had not
sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold ONE copy
of a list of CIA operatives
in one country to one buyer. He is languishing in prison for life.
perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all the
names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in every
country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited others
to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who were known
murderers who had a commitment to kill again. And he had sent it out as
a challenge: are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered
‘Advanced Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.
was very curious that someone close and high up in the investigations
at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was targeting CIA officers. I
was able to supply the GAO with the evidence as to who was doing it.
This person was getting calls and faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet.
Tenet’s faxes included the names of the victims to date. He was being
assisted in his cover-up at a very high level. I investigated whether
the Russians or another foreign group had put him up to this, as his
methods seemed too effective to be that of an individual’ alone.
HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives being
behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld organizations. Most
of the ties, however, were directly to Halliburton. According to
Halliburton’s records which I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these
incitements to murder CIA personnel] had headed one of their
subsidiaries before it went bankrupt.
CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO 'BACK OFF, OR ELSE'
I looked up that old company I did not find a building on the aerial to
correspond to the address. That subsidiary had been selling
intelligence and paramilitary gear. It had specialized in recruiting
mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA had
done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with it and
being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking into whether
he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new subsidiary. Just as soon
as I started that investigation, Cheney called and told me to ‘back off
I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it
certainly sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he
called me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a
face-to-face meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at
once for a time and a place. He hung up: apparently his offer was just
to threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of
those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them. The
Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who incited the murders] was never
prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not allow it. The computers operative
in when they were sold for cash for the benefit of Bush and Cheney at
the White House.
BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an
expensive piece of equipment.
It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA bio-feedback machine that was worth
over $5 million.
had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for the
CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only
purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It was
only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous missions to
places like Russia. And it was only used in very critical missions.
was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how to
overcome that training, if they interrogated about five operatives who
had used it. That is, if they realised that those 5 had been trained in
that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its manual was also top secret
at the time. Loss of that machine and its Manual was the same as
potentially losing every secret a given CIA official had in his or her
mind when they were in Russia. The head of the CIA station in Russia
had been trained on that machine for obvious reasons.
effect of the training was to give the user control over their
automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their fear,
their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to an
interrogation. In addition to those obvious advantages in an
interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave
those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector
test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed' against threats and lie
the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained under
torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a ‘friendly’
interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the effectiveness
of 'friendly interrogations' in WWII. An operative who had fear or fear
of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell all’ in a ‘friendly
interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety. I did not find out about
that theft until the next day. I learned from a Halliburton person that
it had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold
to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security
implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He
had called him and asked him what it was and what it was worth to the
Russians. This was after I had set up the system for things to go
through Alan so that the oversight committee could intervene to stop
the worst violations of national security.
But the thief was a
personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the item straight to the
White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it. Cheney had paid him
$50,000 for it, he informed me. The copy of the telephone call that I
sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had
considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.
CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY
had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about it, how
it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’. He had
called him back and told him a figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him
to find out what was his risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet
called him back and said that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about
4%. In front of Tenet with his phone on
speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.
laughed and said, ‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5 times
total and it has already been used once. We should sell it while it
still has value before those 5 times are up’. He had absolutely no
understanding of intelligence matters. It was not 5 uses of the
machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that machine was
interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years worth of use to
prevent the loss of security codes, national secrets, and how a CIA
station was operating.
I explained it all quite carefully as
Cheney is not a technically minded person. I even asked him questions
to make certain that he had understood what I said correctly [Editor:
This interesting comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that
bright, which may also be judged to be the case, given his behaviour
over the Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money.
It may be that he progressed to these much larger thefts after getting
away with the lesser thefts of which examples have been given in this
narrative]. Cheney then said: ‘Well, what difference does it make since
there are remote viewers like you in Russia who can steal the secrets
then explained that remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that
intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard
data. Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add
some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was
generally worthless in getting information [Editor: Amazing! Was not
Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to extract
intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell holes like
Gantanamo and Abu Ghraib?]. That was true. But it was still wrong to
sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to
deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly
interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.
I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already been sold
to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I would figure
out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that again. He laughed
and said, ‘You haven’t got a chance’. I told him that I would try.
Cheney then said: ‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to
should be apparent to the reader that this exposure reveals a
catastrophic degree of corrupt decadence at the highest levels of the
US Federal Government, for which no further tolerance can possibly be
acceptable. A leisurely investigation by the US Congress during the
closing months of this most evil of American Administrations cannot
reasonably be condoned.
are satisfied, not least given the provenances of this material, that
we are indeed dealing with a terrible crisis of the Republic, which
must be addressed at once.
The unspeakable and immense financial
thefts, scams and other gross abominations that we have reported for
two years in the course of these investigations can now be understood
to represent an outgrowth of a culture of criminal corruption
orchestrated from the outset by the White House, with the two Bush Wars
specifically identified as having been launched specifically for
money-making purposes. Indeed the structure for extracting top dollar
from these contrived and illegal wars was established from the outset
under Executive Orders signed by Der Führer himself.
We have earlier identified the ‘bank raid’ rationale for the invasion
of Iraq; and it is safe to add that the
focus on defeating the Taliban in Afghanistan represents cover for the
seizure of control over the heroin trade, which boomed immediately
after the initial reported Taliban defeat in 2002.
what has not hitherto been exposed is the unprecedented installation of
offices of the Cheney-controlled organised crime operation,
Halliburton, inside both the CIA and the Pentagon.
this extraordinary state of affairs hitherto been linked directly not
only to proven breaches of national security of the most grievous
nature, but also to the murders of the 168 CIA personnel and family
members. It will be interesting to see, now, whether the present
exposure triggers the necessary determination that ‘Act Two’ must be
prosecuted immediately and with steely resolve and determination until
every single one of these rats is exterminated.
time to time certain US websites seek to insinuate that the Editor of
this service is an MI6 officer, or is ‘handled’ in some way or another.
In response to the most recent such insinuation, the Editor despatched
the following riposte to the platform in question:
my original comment on Sorcha Faal I stated that the reports are
written by (1) a US military officer plus (2) an Irish contributor
based in Ireland. This information came from a special source and I
CANNOT elaborate. Period.
I did NOT state, or intend to state,
that the technical trail proved that the Sorcha Faal reports are CIA
reports. This is a typically careless, possibly malicious, distorted
elaboration of what I stated.
I did state, separately, that the trail of the website
whatdoesitmean.com leads to Mclean.
Furthermore I was NOT the first observer to make this point.
the fanciful suggestion that someone is 'running me', I think I
answered that in my email to Rayelan this morning. Perhaps she would be
kind enough to post what I said. If you would like to waste time making
enquiries you will discover that I have been publishing International
and other publications since 1970 as a private
business, and that I haven't
even had time to take a holiday in all that time.
fact that every US intelligence operative is required to deny that he
or she is an intelligence operative does NOT MEAN, and cannot be lazily
extrapolated to mean, that, ergo, any foreigner such as myself who
makes it clear that he is not an intelligence officer, IS an
This is a malicious, lazy, unworthy and illogical fallacy.
And it indicates a lamentable lack of discernment.
what is very interesting is that it JUST HAPPENS TO BE THE BASIS OF THE
EXPOSURES THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE, WITH WHICH I HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED:
THEY ASSUMED I WAS A BRITISH MI6 INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SO THEY BOOBED.
WE PUBLISHED THE EXPOSURES, AND JUST LOOK WHAT HAS HAPPENED. It goes to
show that the US intelligence community isn't as smart as it cracks
itself up to be [as the foregoing exposure comprehensively confirms,
you assume automatically that someone who STUDIES INTELLIGENCE (which I
do) MUST BE an intelligence officer, you are at SERIOUS risk of making
a very big mistake, which is precisely what has happened. If I was an
intelligence officer, my perspective would be truncated, cramped and
compartmentalised, would it not?
In any case it should be fairly
obvious that I have nothing to do with intelligence because I appear to
be the only writer in the world who routinely lambasts the parasitical
intelligence community generally as being a menace to society. For
instance I am the author of the aphorism:
The intelligence community is in control, out of control, and needs to
be brought under control.
I state repeatedly in my reports that a criminalised intelligence
community, especially one as vast as the creepy US intelligence sector,
which controls the Government, is incompatible with good governance:
and I go even further, in pointing out that the criminalised US
is the primary source, due to its status as an uncontrolled, wayward,
wilful and wholly amoral 'state within the state', of the Republic's
extreme crisis and that until the existence of the Intelligence Power
is brought to heel, nothing will go right in the United States.
the person who suggests that I am an intelligence officer myself is
ignorant of my statements on this subject, which I am now delighted to
repeat on this intelligence website, just in case the point hasn't yet
been made with sufficient force elsewhere.
In fact you COULD
say, from the perspective of the two criminalised CIA groups in
question, that their apparently lazy assumption that I am something
other than what I am (namely an investigative journalist who happens to
publish his own media), turns out to have represented a catastrophic
intelligence failure on the part of the Dark Forces we have been
standing up to.
Because they have been very severely beaten up as a consequence.
state precisely what I am, at the foot of each report. I state
unequivocally that I am NOT an agent for a foreign government, and if
anyone tries to start a rumour to that effect I state in the relevant
paragraph that I will see them in the London libel court.
I have been making this crystal clear for well over a year. Would it be
better if the paragraph in question were displayed in 36 point type?
people are so besotted with deception and being lied to that they
automatically assume that everyone has a secret underhand agenda like
all your duplicitous scamsters and intel operatives, so that when
someone who is genuine appears on the scene they cannot believe that he
is not fronting for some agenda or other. This is a Soviet-style
disease, born of decades of Operation Mockingbird and being lied to by
high time people woke up to the fact that NOT EVERYONE IN THE WORLD IS
A CORRUPT, DESPICABLE, DUPLICITOUS LYING SPOOK, operating under
Just because the United States is crawling
with them, it doesn't mean that this model is replicated elsewhere in
the world. It's YOUR disease and we'd be grateful if you'd STOP
projecting it onto the Rest of the World. Your friendly non-spook, Christopher Story