c-story --- -- may 9th- - - _refinancing_the_world_and_refloating_the_u.s._dollar

samedi 10 mai 2008 06 h 43
Afficher les détails du contact
bellringer@fourwinds10.com, sott@signs-of-the-times.org, c.asselin@noos.fr, help@garth.ca, info@archipelagopr.co.uk, info@palestinechronicle.com, nenki@conspiration.cc, medias@amecq.ca, Ken6@Ken-Welch.Com, sophie.thibault@tva.ca, coulissesdupouvoir@radio-canada.ca, ilvayavoirdusport@telequebec.tv





Friday 9 May 2008 01:04







By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York. For earlier reports, press ARCHIVE. Order your subscriptions and our 'politically incorrect', hence correct, intelligence books from the Edward Harle segment.

BOOKS: Edward Harle Limited has so far published FIVE intelligence titles: The Perestroika Deception, by Anatoliy Golitsyn; Red Cocaine, by Dr Joseph D. Douglass, Jr.; The European Union Collective, by Christopher Story; The New Underworld Order, by Christopher Story; and The Red Terror in Russia, by Sergei Melgounov. All titles are permanently in stock. We sell books DIRECT.

The white panel below NEWS gives details of our intel titles/books as they are published.

Please Make a Donation, if you feel able to do so, to help finance Christopher Story's ongoing financial global corruption investigations. Your assistance will be very sincerely appreciated and will make a real difference, hastening the OVERDUE resolution of the worst financial corruption and linked financial fallout in world history. The Editor's $35,000 Wanta bail-out money has been stolen.

As the curtain falls at the end of Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern, by Greenspoon (libretto by Busche), Unterreichsführer Reinhard B. Himmler, handler-in-chief for the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, DC and Dachau, contemplates the coming intermission with such trepidation as a perfectly possessed master operative with no soul is capable of.

(Hydraulics activating the descending curtain, by the way, courtesy of Wantagate, Inc., WI, purveyors of lethal exposure lubricants).

Seated next to Herr Himmler in the ‘Royal Box’ behind a decidedly necessary reinforced protective bullet-proof screen (as no-one knows how many infuriated Ponzi scam victims may be sitting in the auditorium) is the diminutive Führer himself, evidently somewhat the worse for wear, who, having lost the plot of the entire opera(tion) from the outset, has been compulsively fiddling around with the greyscreen monetary manipulation console that he had commandeered in or around June 2006 or earlier from the ‘late’ Hauptfinanzminister Heinrich Paulsohn, or else calling up the Virtual Wars and Virtual Rumours of Wars Department located at the Zentrum für Schrechtlichkeit Georg H. W. Busche, Langley and McLean, to order more virtual diversionary ploys while he contemplates the collapse of his Kriminalreich and of his disastrous and murderous period in office.

Occasionally, his distracted mind wanders back to those carefree days of his youth when blowing up live frogs with firecrackers was his favoured preoccupation.

To his right sits Frau Laura, who has been driven over from the Four Seasons Hotel after flying back, in a hurry, as usual from Dubai, for the occasion.

Unterreichsführer Himmler (Cheney) has meanwhile been racking his addled brain to come up with further deceptions and lies so as to delay, frustrate or abort the global refinancing Settlements.

As is described below, on Wednesday 7th May, his disinformation apparat disseminated a menu of lies and distortions, while the Unterreichsführer himself reportedly suffered another humiliation (as also reported below) when, US sources say, he tried yet again to interfere with the Settlements, which should have been concluded two weeks earlier.

The US sources told the Editor that the ‘riot act’ was read to him during a visit to Philadelphia the next day – a manifestly absurd procedure, as this has happened many times before, to no effect. Reading the riot act to this criminal is like offering him a tissue with which to blow his nose. Such hardened criminal meister-operatives are never susceptible to reasoned warnings of any kind.

In Philadelphia, we were told, Cheney tried yet again to interfere with the Settlements, possibly visiting one or more financial institutions there. But it was also reported that he delivered a ten-minute speech to about 100 workers at a Northeast Philadelphia plant which is printing the so-called 'economic stimulus checks', which is the operation that has been mounted to provide the necessary 'explanation' for the forthcoming economic rebound. When this happens, people will want to know WHY. The real answer will be that the Settlements have been released, but this will never be mentioned. Instead, the 'economic stimulus checks' being paid out to about 130 million Americans (by way also of an election bribe) will be hailed as an act of magnanimity on the part of Der Führer for which the 130 million beneficiaries should all be truly grateful. Cheney told workers that these payments represented 'a shot of energy at the right time (i.e., election time) and in the right way'. The Untereichsführer's peroration was delivered at the Philadelphia Regional Financial Center, one of four centres nationwide that are issuing some 88 million checks between now and July. More to the point here, this facility is a component of the US Treasury Department's Financial Management Service, employing about 170 people. Did we say that the Philadelphia unit is part of the TREASURY? Yes SIR. Then why, pray, was Untereichsführer Cheney delivering this ten-minute speech, and not the US Treasury Secretary or the Undersecretary of the Treasury? Don't send us your answers, PLEASE. It is naturally assumed that none of our readers are sitting on their brains.

Having successfully delayed the agreed Settlements for a further two weeks beyond the date when they should have been finalised, the Unterreichsführer doubtless assumed that he could continue, in ongoing collaboration with the Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein GmbH, to block the huge payout Settlements. By definition, the combination of the Settlements (funds brought onto the balance sheet) and the banking reforms mandated by Basel-II, will effectively start to strangle and smother the globalist Dark Forces’ illegitimate financial spigot, thereby making it much harder for these desperate, cornered cadres to achieve their mad global hegemony objectives.

Back in the real world nearly two years earlier, on or about 21st June 2006, the Chinese authorities entered into a series of contracts with the US Treasury inter alia so as to mobilise $34 trillion held in C.H.I.P.S. (the Clearing House Interbank Payment System accounts used by the Fed to pay the banks) format, for one year and a day.

From this operation to ‘clear the C.H.I.P.S.’, the Chinese authorities stood to earn a profit estimated at $11.0 trillion, for a total due to them of roughly $45 trillion on maturity. However these accounts were fraudulently ‘hollowed out’ by Dr Alan Greenspan, Dr Ben Bernanke, Bush Sr., President Bush Jr. and the Clintons, with the funds and proceeds relocated offshore.

A series of agreements with the Chinese was in fact reached by the former US Treasury Secretary, John Snow and Dr Alan Greenspan, and then later by Dr Ben Bernanke and Henry M. Paulson Jr., in December 2005, and in January, May and June 2006. The May 2006 agreement involved the delivery of the $4.5 trillion ostensibly to finance the Wanta Settlement and ‘The Wanta Plan’, to employ the name coined by the Editor and accepted by the G-7 as ‘fit for purpose’.

The Chinese had also purchased a very large volume of US Treasury securities during the Reagan Administration, the total value of which is believed now to be of the order of $55 trillion. Thus, the Chinese have been owed about $100 trillion by the duplicitous US authorities. Additionally, older US obligations towards the Chinese relating back to the Ming dynasty, remained long outstanding.

When the maturity date for the $34 trillion (probably 22nd June 2007) passed without payment, the tensions that had already arisen between Peking and Washington not least due to the retention by Paulson of the $4.5 trillion sent over by the People’s Bank of China in May 2006 ostensibly to fund the Wanta payment, as confirmed in Wanta’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus [see the Wantagate reports dated 24 June and 9 August 2007], which must be accurate or else the petitioner would have been committing perjury, rose several notches.

Back in December 2006, as we reported at the time, Paulson had been arrested in Germany on the basis of a warrant issued by an ad-hoc World Court/ICJ tribunal in response to complaints received concerning his illegal retention/theft of funds. He was exfiltrated from German custody by British contract operatives (Sandline agents) and then flown over to Washington aboard an almost empty British Airways plane, whereupon he was dumped at the Washington Cathedral, just in time to fall asleep at the endless memorial service for the late President Gerald Ford.

For, far from repaying the Chinese in according with the contract, the American official kleptocracy and their bankster associates continued trading the Chinese funds without China’s authority, using the Chinese $34 trillion as a trading platform, just as they had continued to trade and to leverage the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion, as reported by this service. In short the US crooks wilfully and criminally failed to relinquish control of funds that did not belong to them.

Thus, while we were concentrating upon exposing the scandalous machinations, excuses and foul play exhibited by US Treasury Secretary H. M. Paulson Jr., Vice President R. Cheney and the Bush II White House specifically over the ‘Leo Emil Wanta’ funds, a much bigger, even darker, ongoing criminalist scandal surrounding the exploitation of the Chinese funds was going sour in parallel.

Ironically, our exposures of the sordid shenanigans surrounding the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds served the ‘unintended consequence’ of dislodging, destabilisng and extensively exposing the much bigger financial corruption operations that were taking place at the same time as the hijacking of the ‘Leo Wanta’ funds and the endless US official shiftiness that our Wantagate reports exposed.

On 19th July 2007, a huge replacement LOAN worth an estimated $6.2 trillion was structured and approved within the Bank of England and made available principally by Her Majesty The Queen for delivery to the Bank of New York Mellon, within which $4.5 trillion was now earmarked ostensibly for payment to Wanta and his Commonwealth of Virginia-based AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc., or so we were advised at the time [see the Wantagate report dated 30th July 2007]. Since these funds are LOAN funds, they could be withdrawn more or less on demand.

After various vicissitudes, it was established in September 2007 (as we also reported at the time) that the loan funds were held with Citibank; and it subsequently emerged that these 'Wanta' funds were/are held in a suspense account at that institution, precisely because the funds were on loan mainly from The Queen, and could/can therefore be withdrawn at any time on demand, if they were not expected to be applied in accordance with the lenders’ specific instructions.

Coincidentally or otherwise, on the anniversary of the Chinese contract (21st June 2007), the Bank of New York Mellon advised the US Treasury that (following its then scheduled merger accord with the US securities broker/dealer Mellon Financial Corporation effective 1st July 2007), it would be able ‘to guarantee the delivery’ of the ‘Wanta’ $4.5 trillion to the corporate securities account of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. within the Citibank Morgan Stanley Securities House bank account.

That assertion was a serious felony under the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934, since no American securities house can guarantee any security or the delivery of funds or securities: only banks can guarantee delivery. Our report dated 30th July 2007 explained how Bank of New York Mellon, which was to act solely as a conduit, effectively diverted/stole the huge LOAN funds, which had been the subject of a bank ‘levy’, thereby further encumbering the balance sheets of the six ‘levy banks’ concerned – Crédit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Citibank, Bank of America, and Bank of England.

In the United States, any payment of $1.0 trillion or more is required to be subject to a ‘levy’, to be signed and submitted to the US Treasury, to the Federal Reserve and a financial institution – in this instance, the Bank of New York Mellon, which was guaranteeing the cash and delivery thereof to the institution concerned (Bank of New York Mellon, thus guaranteeing delivery to itself). The $6.2 trillion LOAN proceeds were subjected to a levy via the US law firm of Troutman Sanders LLP. In signing the levy, these institutions placed significant ongoing burdens onto their reserves.

Following these manoeuvres and our exposures of them on our website, the kleptocracy came under severe pressure, which was exacerbated when the Wanta team turned up at Citigroup, 153 East 53rd Street in Midtown New York on 26th October 2007 and also at the premises of Morgan Stanley, 1585 Broadway and 48th Street on the same day – and then again at Citibank, 399 Park Avenue on 20th November 2007, to demand performance by the institutions on the $4.5 trillion.

When the Wanta party were ordered off the Citibank premises on 20th November 2007, having been clandestinely photographed and accompanied, as they left, by the abrupt appearance at the doors of two armed NYPD policemen, Mr Wanta twice ordered his then colleague Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., to ‘Call Chris’; and the Editor was thus duly informed of this scandalous, farcical escalation in ‘real time’ – notwithstanding that on 3rd November 2007, Mr Wanta had told Mr Cottrell that ‘we have to sever our connections with Christopher Story: but don’t tell him’.

In other words, on the one hand Leo E. Wanta had indicated that he would be dispensing with the Editor’s requisitioned services – we had doubtless become ‘too powerful’ – while on the other hand, Wanta, when in distress some weeks later, ordered Mr Cottrell to ‘Call Chris’ TWICE, so that the details of his predicament vis-à-vis Citibank could be posted immediately on our website in order for the whole world to be informed about what was going on.

Unfortunately, Mr Wanta cannot have it both ways. The Editor’s services were not his property, to use, exploit and discard in accordance with his latest whims and requirements. And so, as it duly turned out, this behaviour represented just one double-cross too many.

At all events, the Editor had no reason to know at the time that his requisitioned publicity platform and services were no longer required at all; and indeed he did not become aware that he had been double-crossed, until 17th March 2008 (see below): we therefore continued the Wantagate reports as though nothing had changed. The Editor’s $35,000, provided from scarce private resources in good faith to bail Leo Wanta out of his unlawful probation in Wisconsin, has not been repaid and is therefore now categorised as having been stolen.

On 18th March, the Editor posted the final Wantagate report, indicating to Mr Wanta and anyone else who cared to take note, that so far as Michael C. Cottrell. M.S., and the Editor of this service were concerned, neither would be able to be associated at all, in any way with any activities which may be conducted beyond the Rule of Law, if that was the intention. We thought we made this clear.

The Editor’s suspicions having been aroused, though, he now became aware, as mentioned, that – in conformity with the standard filthy US criminal intelligence community routine – he had indeed been deceived and double-crossed.

This became clear after he had requested, on the 14th March 2008, a written statement from Leo Emil Wanta confirming that all transactions to be undertaken under the Wanta Plan and otherwise, would conform at all times 100% with the Rule of Law, which had been so conspicuously and boldly promulgated via our Wantagate reports, with Leo Wanta’s enthusiastic ongoing support. This was rejected out of hand by one of Mr Wanta’s other colleagues on his behalf, three hours later.

After all, both on our website and in International Currency Review, we had repeatedly displayed a list of the US Statutes and securities regulations of which named parties and institutions were and remain in breach, together with authoritative US legal statements of the position with regard to the torts of Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud by Deceit (Obfuscation and Denial) and Theft, Fraudulent Deceit, and Theft by Deception, Fraudulent Conveyance and Fraudulent Concealment.

How, then, could either Mr Cottrell or the Editor of this service go along with any practice other than 100% adherence to the US Rule of Law, or even with the slightest suspicion that it might be intended not to adhere to it? Besides, in communications to the President of the United States – for instance, in his letter dated 31st August 2007 – Mr Leo Wanta himself had specifically appealed for President Bush to adhere to the Rule of Law:

‘If US President George W Bush, Jr. is operating under the “Rule of Law” which is absolutely shattered “by others”…’.

Evidently the Rule of Law mattered then, but no longer mattered now.

Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., was appointed Secretary/Treasurer of Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, at a Board meeting held in Richmond, VA, on 28th December 2004. Then, on the 16th December 2005, he was appointed to be Executive Vice President and Treasurer of the corporation, and various joint ventures with Mr Cottrell’s own company, Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., were authorised.

On the 14th August 2006, Michael Cottrell was able, thanks to his securities market credentials, good standing and reputation, to obtain a corporate securities account for Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe Inc., into which the $4.5 trillion Wanta ‘compromise’ settlement funds were to be paid.

Mr Cottrell insisted throughout that a corporate securities account would be mandatory, so far as he was concerned, for fundamental reasons alluded to in earlier reports on this website.

For instance, under the 1933 and 1934 Securities Acts, the assets of clients of US broker-dealers are not included within the assets of the institution, so that they cannot be sequestrated – contrary to the position with US banks. Mr Cottrell advised that given that all Leo E. Wanta’s bank accounts appeared to have been raided and ransacked, he, of all people, ought to be aware that US banks cannot be trusted and that ‘his’ funds would be permanently at risk in any bank account.

This advice was rejected outright by Wanta, thereby removing any point in Mr Wanta employing the services of a financial adviser and securities expert, let alone an expert of the calibre of Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.. If Wanta was not prepared to listen to this expert, and to pay proper attention to his conscientious advice, how could he (Mr Cottrell) perform his duties?

For this and other reasons, such as Wanta’s generally indisciplined approach to transactions, Mr Cottrell finally indicated, in the first quarter of 2008, that he would not be able to participate at all with Wanta in the pre-planned joint venture and other transactions unless (a) the transactions were to be conducted, as arranged and previously agreed, via the corporate securities account which had been made available due to Mr Cottrell's own credentials; and (b) an Oversight Panel was to be appointed with a brief to supervise all such transactions.

The most obvious reason for this second demand was that should any decisions be made by Wanta arbitrarily, and transactions undertaken, contrary to Michael C. Cottrell’s professional advice and in defiance of the regulations and the Rule of Law, it would not just be Mr Wanta that would be liable, but Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., would be liable, as Executive Vice President/Treasurer, as well.

We hinted at this situation in our Wantagate report dated 3rd March 2008, which was specifically designed to warn Wanta of the consequences of any deviation from the Rule of Law. To no avail.

When all his necessary professional advice ‘went nowhere’, Mr Cottrell prepared to separate from Wanta. On 23rd March 2007, though, Leo Wanta jumped the gun by issuing a three-page document headed ‘Minutes of Special Meeting of the Sole Shareholder of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.’, implying that Wanta had held a meeting with himself. He faxed this irregular document to Michael Cottrell.

Elementary business practice requires the DIRECTORS, not the shareholder(s), to convene and hold Board Meetings, which issue Resolutions. This document, which was distributed 'to others’ and is in any case in the public domain in Richmond, VA (see below), contained this paragraph:

‘BE IT RESOLVED, that the undersigned hereby directs that the Officers and the Directors of the Corporation take all such official actions as may be required to notify all outside parties including banks, financial houses, securities dealers, government agencies, government officials (foreign and domestic) that MICHAEL C. COTTRELL, M.S., has no right, authority and/or fiduciary capacity to conduct any form of business either in law and/or equity on behalf of the Corporation [AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.] and/or on behalf of any other Officer, Director and/or Shareholder of the Corporation’.

As the formally appointed Executive Vice President and Treasurer of AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc. [see above] Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., who had now been dismissed by Wanta by means of an irregular document, proceeded, as instructed, to regularise the situation by fulfilling his responsibilities to the letter and promptly filing notification of his ‘resignation’ with the relevant Commonwealth of Virginia authorities in Richmond, using the forms that they provide for such purposes – enclosing the various pertinent documents including the irregular ‘dismissal’ document issued by Leo Wanta, and directing the Commonwealth of Virginia State authorities to forward all documentation and taxation demands to Wanta’s address in Wisconsin.

As noted, all this filing and related documentation sits in the public domain in Richmond. It will of course be recalled that Wanta represented that he was not running a business out of the State of Wisconsin [see Wantagate report dated 6th August 2007, all of which remains accurate and is in no way nullified by this latest sequence of events].

For the record also, Wanta issued a document dated 26th February 2006 labelled TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, which is likewise in the public domain, which reads inter alia as follows:

Settlement Offers, e.g. December 12, 2006, et al: ‘This letter authorizes Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the President of Pennsylvania Investments, Inc., as of this date, to conclude the details and disposition of said settlement funds for deposit via Pennsylvania Investments, Inc. Account(s) on behalf of Leo E. Wanta/Lee E. Wanta with the United States Social Security Number’ [redacted].

This document was signed by Wanta and appropriately witnessed.

Separately, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., is believed to have prepared due diligence documentation running to several hundreds of pages containing inter alia papers signed by Leo/Lee Wanta giving details of agreed financial operations and pay orders worth very large aggregate sums of money, to be made available as required to demonstrate the damage that Mr Cottrell and his own corporation have suffered. It is understood that the evidence that is contained in this due diligence portfolio will be likely to have profound and painful repercussions.

‘Fraud by Inducement‘ springs immediately to mind in this context. Entering into huge financial undertakings without the finances to fund them, may represent Fraud by Inducement. As for this Editor’s paltry $35,000, as separately mentioned, it is nearly one year overdue and is currently considered to have been stolen. Stealing money is still a felony, even in the United States.

All of the above will explain, to anyone who may have been puzzled, why we posted the Wantagate article dated 18th March 2008, which represented the FINAL attempt by Mr Cottrell, supported by the Editor of this service, to try to make it clear to Wanta and relevant parties that adherence to the US Rule of Law with no deviation therefrom at any time now or in the future, would remain the only criterion that would determine whether or not Mr Cottrell could be a party to any transactions to be conducted by and with Wanta generally, and specifically in the format of the The Wanta Plan.

Reverting now to events which preceded the severance outlined above: the aforementioned visits by the Wanta team, as then constituted, to the two institutions that were involved in playing games with the $4.5 trillion, sent a powerful tsunami of belated alarm throughout those key elements of the international financial community then ‘in the know’, since we understand that neither Citibank nor Morgan Stanley thought that the Wanta people would ever turn up at those institutions.

It is further understood that the three Wanta team visits caused consternation and trepidation in the Boardrooms of both institutions, and throughout Wall Street generally.

The main problem facing the very large financial institutions is that they have been involved in tax evasion on a monumental scale, inter alia by using exempted accounts held with the International Monetary Fund to channel and handle undeclared, ongoing untaxed exotic financial refunding and discounting transactions ‘below the radar’, which is one of several sound reasons why the blunt description ‘criminal enterprise’ as applied to these enterprises in general cannot be disputed.

It may be recalled that it was in our closing Wantagate Report (18th March 2008), that Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S. first made it clear, in public, that he would not now be participating in any pre-agreed financial transactions with Leo E. Wanta without the reassurance and backstop to be provided by an Oversight Panel, in order to ensure that all Wanta transactions complied 100% with the Rule of Law at all times – which would presuppose that any off-balance sheet, undercover, secret, untaxed and otherwise irregular transactions, would be precluded and that he, Mr Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., could not accordingly be implicated in any such irregular transactions.

The Editor supported this stance with his own commendation, stating that, given our common human nature and the temptations to which we are all subject, no-one could object to such a requirement. Further details, with documents, are published in International Currency Review.

In light of the instances of the ongoing financial criminality exposed inter alia via the Wantagate reports, the Group of Seven (G-7) financial powers have finally demanded, as pointed out in our report dated 12th April 2008, that the scandalous hijacking of the global financial economy by the reckless Bush-Clinton ‘shadow government’ grabitisation network (a.k.a. Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH) will no longer be tolerated – pointedly endorsing, in a reprimand to the White House and to the criminal elements resident inside the US Treasury and the biggest Wall Street institutions, the report of the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) publicised during the Spring Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank (1), which now demanded much stricter discipline and safeguards against embedded criminality throughout the financial system.

Specifically, the Group of Seven (G-7) Ministers and Governors stated that ‘we… strongly endorse the report and commit to implementing its recommendations. Rapid implementation of the Financial Stability Forum report will not only enhance the resilience of the global financial system for the longer term, but should help to support confidence and improve the functioning of the markets’.

The G-7 statement claimed that the report presented a specific and substantive set of practical reform recommendations, identifying four rigorous proposals which MUST be implemented over the 100 days (2) following the international agreement to release (reached on Sunday, 13th April) to be augmented by five further requirements, including the following:

‘Strengthening the authorities' responsiveness to risk: Supervisors and central banks should further strengthen cooperation and exchange of information, including the assessment of financial stability risks. It is important that an “international college of supervisors” be established for EACH OF THE LARGEST GLOBAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS’.

‘Market authorities should also act cooperatively and swiftly TO INVESTIGATE AND PENALIZE FRAUD, MARKET ABUSE, AND MANIPULATION’.

What this meant was that each of the big financial institutions is to be supervised by a separate international supervisory and monitoring 'college', so as to enforce discipline and rectitude within this free-wheeling, headstrong and aberrant segment of the international financial community.

Logically, therefore, ANY organisation controlling very large sums of money would be considered a financial institution requiring to be permanently subjected to the discipline and transparency to be demanded by its own ‘international college of supervisors’. That should include Wanta's entity.

In other words, Mr Michael C. Cottrell’s stated REQUIREMENT for an Oversight Panel to monitor the financial operations in which he was to be involved, has been ADOPTED ACROSS THE BOARD and is now an IRREVOCABLE NECESSITY, as a specific, predictable and unavoidable consequence of the wayward, arrogant, swashbuckling financial fraud, endless lies and duplicity, the open-ended theft and institutionalised criminality spotlighted inter alia by the Wantagate reports.

This reprobate behaviour continues to this day, not only because these criminal leopards cannot change their spots, but also as the thieves try vainly to disguise their abject defeat by maximising the potential for obfuscating it with evil and crass diversionary ploys of every description.

Manifestly, any antagonism towards, and open opposition to, this logical response to decades of fraudulent, untaxed finance and tax evasion, exposes objectors as being unwilling to submit to the Rule of Law and to the disciplines at long last demanded by the international community, now that this open-ended financial criminality has been exposed.

Hence, there can be no turning back on this score, so that anyone resisting this measure will, by definition, automatically attract the attention of national supervisors and law enforcement, whether connected with the criminalised intelligence community or not, as being prospectively liable in the future to flout the Rule of Law, so that such persons could never be trusted to handle large sums of money in a transparent manner. And given what has been exposed, nor should they be.

Interestingly, minimal attention was directed towards this matter during the weeks immediately following the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, which is why we stress its importance here.

As we pointed out, with emphasis, in our report on 12th April:






Meanwhile, as the impact inter alia of the Wantagate reports about these scandals reverberated around the official world, the true proportions of US official and banking sector fraudulent finance and scamming sank in, triggering the generalised crisis of confidence that erupted in July 2007 – focused on securitised investment vehicles (SIVs) which were now suspected of incorporating fake mortgage documentation (euphemistically referred to as ‘sub-prime ‘mortgages, but which actually represented, in part, ‘virtual assets’ backed by nothing at all).

It was now realised that the Americans had been flogging dud paper all over the world, that these scams were orchestrated or aided and abetted by US official and intelligence cadres, and that it was by no means an exaggeration to refer, as this service has done, to certain huge American banks as criminal enterprises. This stricture is known to have caused ‘angst’ on Wall Street.

The upshot was that, as we reported, at least 4,500 US bankers were rounded up and flown to European centres last year, where they were subjected to interrogation. The actual number of bankers rounded up in September-November 2007 may have reached 6,000. It will be recalled that we reported that nine aircraft were ‘requisitioned’ for the purposes of conveying the handcuffed bankers to the European interrogation centres, and that, in many instances, wives and partners were given no opportunity to say goodbye or even to telephone their families.

As a consequence of these interrogations, the gravely affronted international community obtained watertight specifics and evidence about the massive proportions of the ongoing financial thefts and fraudulent finance, leveraging, exploitation and other abuses of stolen funds, including the $34 trillion belonging to the Chinese parties, the $6.2 trillion of loan funds made available by HM The Queen, and of course the original $4.5 trillion provided in 2006 by the People’s Bank of China in apparent response to the ‘surfacing’ of Leo Emil Wanta, when he ‘ceased to be dead’ contrary to the CIA’s promulgated lie to that effect, after the Editor of this service provided the sum of $35,000 with which ‘Restitution’ was paid to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections for remittance to the corrupt Wisconsin State Department of Revenue [see report dated 6th August 2007].

It should be added here that the Editor has received NO RESPONSE from Judge James Martin, of Wisconsin, to whom he wrote last October under the 'Misprision of Felony' Statute, pointing out the scandalous triplication of tax-collection and other fabrications by the Wisconsin State Department of Revenue. It was incumbent upon the Editor to draw his attention to these abominations.

It is believed that in the course of November last year, the Chinese authorities, MI6 (on behalf of Her Majesty), the Swiss authorities, the Group of Seven, perhaps the representatives of the 160 payee countries and other aggrieved parties pooled their resources in the face of these endless US outrages, so that thereafter the pressure exerted by the international community proved to be relentless, and far more effective than had been the case earlier.

There was confirmed talk of an international economic embargo being imposed upon the United States, as we reported; and tensions became more evident inside the Beltway, beginning with that incident when a blaze broke out at the Old Executive Office Building on 19th December 2007, as cover for the seizure of yet more damning evidence of official corruption from Cheney files by US Special Forces operatives.

The shootings that occurred on 28th/29th December 2007, can now be understood in the broader context of aggrieved parties, domestic and external, taking matters into their own hands. A high-level decision was subsequently made to maintain the fiction that Paulson remained both alive and US Treasury Secretary, despite massive evidence to the contrary, culminating in intelligence from several sources that Treasury officials have been referring to the ‘Paulson’ as ‘the double’.

None of the intelligence on this subject that we published on 2nd and 9th January 2008 has ever been officially denied, while the information was very specifically reconfirmed inter alia by a former Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, a US Ambassador (both of whose identities are known to us but have been suppressed by us on request), and by the US State Department itself.

That Department is known to lie frequently; and if it did so on this occasion, it will bear its own responsibility and iniquity. Attempts to discredit the Wanta files could never have succeeded anyway, as a substantial proportion of them have long since been published in facsimile format in International Currency Review, and are thus resident in files, libraries and safe locations all over the world. Wantagate and its consequences cannot be stuffed back into the genie's bottle.

A Japanese visitor to the Editor’s London office in late March informed us that the ‘Paulson’ who appeared at the Group of Eight meeting held in Tokyo on 10th February 2008, was replaced by a second ‘Paulson’ half way through the conference, implying that there are multiple Mr P. ‘doubles’. Nothing has ever been heard from the family about this affair.

Paulson had alienated vast funds inter alia to Bank Leumi.

That such violence erupted – after an earlier gun battle in the Vice President’s premises in June 2007 had been hushed up, like the attempt by US Special Forces to ‘take out’ Herr Cheney while his plane was parked on the runway at Sydney Airport, Australia, during the spring of 2007 – can today be more easily comprehended given the unprecedented magnitude of the exposed financial scams being committed on a gargantuan scale by the organised criminal mafiosi occupying the highest offices in the United States. The timing of the attack to ‘take out’ Cheney in Australia related, we suspect, to the stealing of The Queen’s gold on 29th-30th March 2007 – another colossal criminal operation layered on top of those already cited, and which was only rectified around July 2007 (we believe) after insistent pressure from The Queen, and our reports suggesting that the American Ambassador should be kicked out of London. Where possible, these 'things' are done abroad.

The Editor speculates that a US official criminalist ‘rationalisation’ for the stealing of The Queen’s gold may have been a possible refusal by the British authorities to allow any US access to the $100 trillion or so of estimated fiat assets accumulated by Mr Saddam Hussein and his late sons in Bank Rafidain (see below), which were believed to have been retained in sub-accounts of the London branch of that institution. This in turn means that these ‘Saddam Hussein’ assets appear to have been annexed by the British authorities and banks, not least to buttress the financial positions of banks in the City of London. All international strife and tensions are about MONEY, not resources.

Notwithstanding the general outrage surrounding the theft of The Queen’s gold, Gordon Brown, the British Prime Minister – whose 55 minute audience of The Queen on 27th June 2007, when he attended at Buckingham Palace to be appointed Prime Minister, is believed to have focused on Her Majesty’s extreme concern about the stealing by US criminal operatives of her gold – failed to take the opportunity to give the American Administration a piece of his mind, when he delivered a knee-jerk globalist speech at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston on 18th April 2008. Sophisticates would argue that you don’t abuse a formal platform provided by a foreign government as an honour, by criticising the host authorities. This would be fine if the authorities in question had not criminally attempted to impoverish an allied Head of State.

This was an occasion when Brown could have to torn the Bush White House to shreds in public, speaking the only language that these veteran mega-criminals can understand. In doing so, Brown would have greatly enhanced his faltering domestic support: standing up to this odious American Government would be worth a huge number of British votes. Admittedly Gordon Brown did allude to tensions between Britain and the United States in oblique terms – observing that ‘we urgently need to step out of the mindset of competing interests and instead find our common interests – and we must summon up the best instincts and efforts of humanity in a cooperative effort to build new international rules and institutions for the new global era’ (code for 'your selfishness sucks').

But one cannot appeal to the ‘best instincts of criminals’, because they don’t have any: so that was absurd. Then Mr Brown revealed, loud and clear, that he is an international socialist, which he has never, as far as we know, done in public before: ‘That is how we must respond, not walking away as we did in Rwanda at the cost of many thousands of lives, but by becoming engaged as hard-headed internationalists’. Unfortunately, this British Prime Minister's 'hard-headed internationalism' does not seem to extend to Zimbabwe, where the abominations perpetrated by Mr Mugabe’s Illuminati-sponsored ‘Black’ dictatorship are reported to be on the verge or morphing into genocide.

When such ‘hard-headed internationalists’ use typically clichéd ideological rhetoric, what they are actually driving at is that national boundaries, national sovereignty and nation states generally are expendable, in the interests of prompting and realising the ‘new global era’ – Brown’s euphemism for The New Underworld Order. The Prime Minister is a master of the dull, repetitious cliché, and his mind appears to be choked with all the false diversionary globalist issues, viz. ‘climate change’.

This internationalist bogey, by the way, has recently changed its name from ‘global warming’ because the scientific evidence that human activity is responsible for it has been shown to be spurious and riddled with holes. For instance, in the 1950s, numerous mammalian fossils were unearthed during foundation works in Trafalgar Square, Pall Mall, Lower Regent Street, and also Cockspur Street, in Central London – the remains of hippopotami, lions, hyaenas, straight-tusked elephants, aurochs, and bison, which patrolled the area approximately 125,000 years ago (3).

Finally, after trotting out the usual empty and duplicitous verbiage about ‘America leading the world in the fight against terrorism’ – when, as a British intelligence officer, Brown must surely be aware that the United States deliberately promotes international terrorism as an instrument of state and internationalist policy – Brown concluded with an invocation of the ‘special relationship’.

But this was destroyed when US Government's criminalist cadres stole The Queen’s gold, and has been further undermined by the recalcitrant behaviour of the Bush-Clinton Weltkriminalgesellshaft régime over its retention of financial assets that do not belong to the United States contrary to the exasperated will of the international community. Talk of a ‘special relationship’ against this very well-known background is both dishonest and meaningless: and only the probably ignorant and sycophantic audience at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library could have been impressed.

Following the severe drubbing that Brown’s Labour Government received from the disaffected electorate in local government and London elections on 1st May, press analysis of the expected outcome contained few indications that the UK ‘mainstream’ media had much of a clue about the unprecedented scale of the global refinancing operation that was taking place behind the scenes – with the exception of the following closing remarks that appeared on the front page of The Daily Telegraph, London, on 2nd May 2008:

‘Key to the Labour recovery is an optimistic view of the UK economy. The Bank of England on Wednesday said that the worst of the global credit crunch could be over and Mr Brown is betting on a significant upturn’ (4).

The observations revealed, of course, that, as a senior UK intelligence officer, Brown knew that the refinancing releases, involving the placement of some $300 trillion onto the books – a process that was necessarily taking time to complete – was well under way, and would indeed reach the anticipated satisfactory (for some) conclusion.

This ‘optimistic’ view of future economic and financial prospects was supported (on 6th May) by Sir Win Bischoff, the leading UK banker who was ‘parachuted in’ to Citibank, New York, last autumn, almost certainly to ensure that The Queen’s loan funds held within that institution (in a suspense account) were properly safeguarded. It was further supported on the 7th May by George Soros (on Bloomberg) and again by several German bankers (Forbes). These hints reflect the reality that well-placed bankers know that the Settlements are proceeding, and that repeated ongoing attempts by the Weltkriminalgesellschaft to block them, will not be allowed to succeed.

A further oblique indication that 'matters are proceeding' behind a deliberately contrived veil of obfuscation (consisting of contrived 'virtual' tensions, an information blackout about the releases, an attempt to ignite a virtual-cum-real diversionary conflagration in the Middle East, the 'economic stimulus checks' and much confused reporting by the Fifth Estate), concerns the outlook for the two huge 60,000-tonne aircraft carriers for The Queen/Royal Navy, estimated to cost $4.0 billion each. The Editor is in a position to know that this project, which the Ministry of Defence has ring-fenced, is to be financed out of 'settlement money'. Hitherto, Parliament has been aggravated by the fact that the Ministry of Defence has prevaricated and refused to provide it with information as to when the contracts for these huge carriers will be announced. Various references to this matter have appeared recently in the British Press. On 9th May, the London media reported that defence sources had stated that the Ministry of Defence is to agree a contract for the ships within the next few weeks. The Ministry of Defence cannot 'agree a contract' unless it has the funds with which to finance it, otherwise it will be engaged in Fraud by Inducement.

Since the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings, and especially during the first week of May, six weeks after innumerable secret bank accounts holding stolen and unreported, untaxed funds had been ripped open, truly massive amounts of offshore monies (amounting to the estimated $300 trillion) had been repatriated to the United States for placing onto the books in conformity with the Basel-II requirements applicable to the ‘new’ banking régime.

As was previously reported on this website (17th April), the United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child into the new Basel-II compliance banking environment with effect from one minute past midnight on Monday 14th April 2008.

That was a decisive development, given the US Government's endless and crude resistance.

Faced with the imminent total exposure of their serial giga-criminality, the worst perpetrators of these crimes – the Bushes, Dr Alan Greenspan, the Clintons, Mr Cheney et al – had been exerting maximum pressure through their lawyers to obtain immunity from prosecution, trying their luck with the US Supreme Court as well as the World Court/ICJ.

By the third week of April, we had established that the World Court had REFUSED any immunity for Greenspan and former President W. Clinton (which means, incidentally, that the Clintons’ second (Irish) passports won’t be of use should either try to flee the United States, as Ireland subscribes to the jurisdictions of the World Court/ICJ).

We also understand that none of the US criminalist perpetrators are likely to ‘escape’ the wrath to come, and which is descending upon them ‘as we speak’. It is more than likely that, quite apart from other sanctions, China, having been finally repaid, will take measures to ensure that the retribution demanded by their culture is satisfied, according to several sober experts we have consulted.

Significantly, senior people were reported to us to have left the White House on Monday 21st April (information provided by an informed source at 6.30pm on that date), these departures having NOT been announced – implying that the rush for the exit had accelerated with a turn of events that had placed the international community decisively in the driving seat pending resolution of the crisis.

After all, since most of the key people even at the Treasury were expected to be arrested, hanging around in the doomed Bush II White House was no longer, for understandably alarmed operatives, a sensible option. Whether these people have fled the country is not yet known. It was further the case that George Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. were both informed that the absolute end of the road had been reached – and that if the releases were frustrated in any way, both would be arrested without any further ado. The CURRENT state of affairs is that the Settlements should have been completed over two weeks ago, and APPEAR to have been frustrated. However our best 'special' intelligence sources insist that this is not the case. The apparent information blackout is said to be contrived.

It was widely rumoured on Sunday 20th April that the Vatican, the Knights of Malta and the Knights Templar had been ‘paid’ – prompting appropriately cynical observations about a certain category of Illuminati recipient ‘naturally’ being paid first. Then again, on 2nd May, it was being said by different sources that the Mormons and the Knights of Malta were being funded before anyone else. None of this was accurate, since economic receipt by ALL recipients is to be taken simultaneously.

Specifically, it was suggested earlier that the Vatican had been repaid $2.0 trillion (it’s always $2.0 trillion, isn’t it) which had been scammed from the Vatican Bank by George Bush Sr., who bled the bank dry after he was kicked out of Spain by Banco de España following our exposures in 2006.

Bush had pleaded with the Vatican to accept his funds, but as usual he had then orchestrated the ransacking of the receiving bank (by some means or other of which we are unaware).

The Vatican was said to have been repaid from the Marshall Act account, a CIA account which Bush Sr. had been using as his own private trading platform. Langley, after all, has been renamed ‘The George Bush Center for Intelligence’.

Separately, during the preceding week, the Knights of Malta evidently complained that they did not fancy being paid in US Treasuries, and after three days of negotiations they managed to procure an agreement that they should be paid in cash.

This may have been the origin of suggestions, which we reported on 17th April, that payments would be made in the form of Treasury securities, which, despite the fact that the United States is/has been completely bust and that the US Treasury cannot be trusted, are ironically the best asset obtainable, given that gold is subject to manipulation and its price is normally rigged.

On Monday 21st April, an attempt was made to arrest Vice President Richard B. Himmler (Cheney), which was thwarted when US Marshals tipped him off. It was later understood that these Marshals had been ‘handled’ by MI6 officers, who have been crawling around in the United States, along with Chinese and other World Court/ICJ agents, to procure an end already to the endless duplicity of the US kleptocracy-mafiosi and to assure final completion of the delayed releases.

All of which will have left the relevant US Congressional Committees, and numerous legislators, feeling most uncomfortable – not least since investigations conducted in Europe in the spring of 2007, as we reported at the time, turned up detailed information about offshore bank accounts held by over 1,500 individuals on Capitol Hill. It is unclear whether information concerning an estimated 200 bank accounts established in the past in Canada (allegedly with Royal Bank of Canada), which were at one time being ‘hidden’ by the since imprisoned ONI operative Mark Delmart Vreeland, had been thrown into the World Court/ICJ ‘mix’: but in the prevailing tense climate, these exposures can hardly have left anyone on Capitol Hill confident of not having his or her front door broken down in the middle of the night by Navy Seals (see below).

Many weeks earlier, intelligence was leaked about the untimely death of Austie Patricia McCracken, described as a former ‘CIA Project Director’. The Washington Post reported on the 8th March 2008, that ‘Ms Austie Patricia McCracken, 62, former Project Director for the CIA’s Counterintelligence Center, died [on] February 14th at her home in The Woodlands, Texas’. This ‘just happens’ to be where former President George H. W. Bush lives. And Ms McCracken ‘just happened’ to have been a key keeper of the funds (allegedly inter alia of the ‘Leo Wanta funds’) who could accordingly be assumed to have ‘known too much’. The newspaper report elaborated that ‘the cause of death is under investigation by the Montgomery County, Texas, Justice of the Peace Office’.

The report then broke with the norm and provided details which are NEVER divulged – from which the Editor deduces that the CIA, or elements of it, were/are extremely uptight about this sudden death. According to The Washington Post, ‘Ms McCracken joined the Central Intelligence Agency in 1967 and worked there for 23 years in field positions overseas as well as in the United States. She rose to personnel-evaluation management officer, to directorate equal employment opportunity officer, and to branch and deputy branch chief before becoming the Counterintelligence Center’s Project Director in 1989’.

‘When she retired in 1991, she received a Career Intelligence Medal and Citation, which noted that she was ‘known as a problem solver who possessed a phenomenal memory, very keen insight and excellent judgment’.

‘She was born in Hempstead, NY, and graduated from East Texas State University in Commerce, TX. After her retirement from the CIA, she moved to Orlando. She moved to Texas in November 2007. Her marriage to Paul Dale Roche ended in divorce. Survivors include two brothers’.

We are advised by an impeccable source ‘in the know’ that such details, as indicated, are NEVER divulged for public consumption. It can be speculated that she may have been enticed in some way to The Woodlands area of Houston by George Bush Sr., who may have needed to know what she knew about the accounts. The fact that The Washington Post only published this potted biography of this CIA woman on 8th March, when she died on 14th February, was also extremely suspicious.

Just three days later, in the early morning of 17th February 2008, according to ‘insider’ reports, a United Nations employee, Ms Maria DiBiase, plunged to her death from the 19th floor of the UN Headquarters building in New York City. The 19th floor houses the Department of Peace-Keeping Operations/Field Administration and Logistics Division (DPKO/FALD), as well as the code machines used for the encrypted fax equipment employed for DPKO operations, plus a spare range of code machines used for DPKO rapid response functions. The dead woman, from Austria, was reportedly a computer specialist for the United Nations, and a former Conference Services staff member with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna.

An Associated Press report dated Tuesday 19th February stated that police and UN security officers at the scene, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to talk to the media, said that the woman, in her 40s, had jumped from a window after turning up to work early in the morning of the previous Sunday. UN deputy spokeswoman, Marie Okabe, said that ‘a UN agency staff member died after falling from the 19th floor of the UN Secretariat Building. At this time there is no suspicion of foul play’. Ms Marie Okabe added that UN officials would not confirm the woman’s identity even after her next of kin had been notified. So details of the woman’s identity was left to a ‘licensed’ US website information source, which elaborated that:

‘The UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) maintained in a special United Nations computer database all the files on Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction program [that were] retrieved from the compact disks provided to UNSCOM by Saddam’s Government prior to the US invasion of Iraq. The database is reported to include all the black market nuclear suppliers involved in providing materials to Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Libya via Turkey and the A Q Khan smuggling network. The list reportedly includes front companies in Switzerland linked to Marc Rich, the American fugitive pardoned by President Clinton, and Dick Cheney’.

The intelligence source was told that there may have been a ‘black bag’ operation taking place on the 19th floor at the same time that DiBiase arrived for work, to finish a project that was due on the following Monday morning, 18th February. The UNSCOM files reportedly validate many of former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds’ claims about nuclear smuggling that had been published earlier in The Sunday Times, London.

Marc Rich is a long-range Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (DVD) operative named Hans Brand, who emigrated to Canada in 1954, staying initially in Saskatoon.

He has established a bank in Zug, Switzerland.

There was no mention in any of these and related reports of the two Soviet ships that left the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr about three weeks ahead of the US-led invasion, and then vanished.

These ships carried the physical evidence of weapons of mass destruction, in accordance with the standard Soviet-era policy of removing most traces of such weapons activity whenever the risk of Western retaliation was judged to have become excessive. In Romania, this standard official policy was codenamed ‘Operation Sarindar’, according to a Romanian defector – information that was first published in the US press in September 2003.

The Editor obtained outline details of how all traces of Mr Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were extracted from Iraq ahead of the invasion in March 2003, inter alia from British and Russian (GRU) sources. This intelligence must have been known in London and Washington. Furthermore, it was reported in our Arab-Asian Affairs and Soviet Analyst intelligence services, which circulate among foreign governments and their intelligence communities.

On Tuesday 22nd April 2008, one week after the Settlements should have been finalised, it became known that the European parties and the Chinese had ‘allowed’ an extension of the ‘immunities’ for the key criminalists until 5.00pm on Friday 25th April – which date and time was then confirmed at the time by all our sources to represent the absolute deadline beyond which no further delay in effecting the Settlements would be tolerated. There is no way of telling whether this information represented a smokescreen of lies or not.

Also on the 22nd, an elderly Trustee aged 80, who had been working conscientiously on these matters for 20 years and had been repeatedly called into the relevant bank at all hours of the day and night at short notice in expectation of completions and releases, suddenly collapsed and was rushed to hospital. We were authoritatively advised that the Trustee had been in excellent health and that an attempt had been made on his life – a fact which evidently caused absolute fury behind the scenes. Indeed we were informed that ‘no resources will be spared’ to identity and ‘deal with’ whoever gave the order for this attempted liquidation of this conscientious octogenarian, and that ‘no mercy’ would be spared in this connection.

The ‘extension’ to the high-level US ‘immunities’ was granted, we were led to believe, because multiple verification procedures had been insisted upon by the Group of Seven (G-7), the World Court/ICJ, the Chinese authorities, the 160 governments whose representatives had been waiting impatiently as we had reported, since October 2007, and MI6 acting for HM The Queen. Of these powerful international forces arrayed against the duplicitous official criminalist mafiosi, the most formidable, apart from The Queen, has been Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister.

Madame Wu was reported to have been equipped with a Writ of Execution or Lien from the World Court/ICJ (International Court of Justice) which can declare its own jurisdiction when any national jurisdictions fail in their duties against criminals, especially as China is a sovereign nation with its own Judge in the ICJ – enabling Madame Wu to foreclose on 20 banks, and to seize the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury on behalf of her own defrauded Government, the Group of Seven, the World Court/ICJ and The Queen, should the releases not (as matters then stood) be completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April.

Seizure of the Federal Reserve would deprive that decadent private institution of its only asset, namely the contract with the United States of America to print money – so that the United States would essentially cease to be sovereign, and would become a weak satrap of the international community which would remain the case at least until it had put its house in order.

However the releases were NOT completed by 5.00pm on Friday 25th April 2008: indeed, they had not even started. We did hear that two Trustees went to their banks at 4.00pm, within an hour of the deadline, and we thought that this might suggest that the official kleptocracy had suspended its blocking of the Settlements just in time to prevent Madame Wu from exercising her Writ of Lien.

That turned out to be the wrong interpretation. The delay, we learned on Saturday 26th April, was associated with the multiple third party verification procedures, including having documentation systematically signed and stamped by the US Supreme Court – the definitive effect of which was intended to be, to prevent any possibility of further highest-level US criminalist resistance and impediments to the Settlements, and thus to the refinancing of the United States and the world financial economy, and to the fifth refloating of the US dollar (see our report dated 17th April).

One cannot very well have transactions and the availability of funds verified by people who have lied, stolen and deceived for years on an open-ended basis.

Hence, the necessary and agreed-upon third party verification and confirmation procedures, to confirm ‘eyes-on’ that the money was ‘there’, were scheduled for Monday 28th April, not Sunday 27th as assumed by some (which could not have occurred because the banks were not open in the generally accepted sense and such operations could not take place outside normal banking hours, the Editor was advised, without drawing attention to what was happening).

Thereafter, release procedures apparently continued without causing the international community in general, and Madame Wu in particular, undue concern. If documentation has to be verified and stamped, and given that we are talking about Settlements aggregating some $300 trillion, it can be understood that things have been taking 'a little longer than anticipated'.

A total of 27 of the highest-level US office-holders and officials had been told that any further interference on their part would result in their immediate arrest. It should be pointed out that the ‘arrest’ environment is now much harsher than was even the case when the 4,500-6,000 bankers were being rounded up last October.

On the evening of Friday 25th April, 128 Navy Seals were flown into Washington, DC, from California and Colorado. These operatives do not ring the doorbell: they break the door down with sledge hammers. It is said that Navy Seals ‘eat other military personnel for lunch’.

We took this to indicate that, as Washington, DC, had earlier been said by certain ‘connected’ sources (unverified) to have been discreetly surrounded by the US military, including the 82nd Airborne, since at least March, with deployments to the DC area starting even earlier, arrests of perpetrators were about to begin. According to several reports, between 4,500 and 9,000 arrests were said to be imminent, as of the afternoon of Sunday 27th April. On making enquiries, we had established by late that Sunday that certain people were already being arrested – including, in particular, ‘friends’ of the arch-criminalist Dr Greenspan, who had attempted to steal $8 trillion in the past, and ‘friends’ of his evil partner in crime, George H. W. Bush Sr. However it has not been possible to verify these reports, as everything is being done below the radar.

We also understood that documents concerning the National Economic Security and Reformation Act (NESARA), hoarded by Chief Justice Roberts on behalf of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, had been taken from him, apparently on the orders of The Queen (implemented by MI6, who have been present as noted in the United States (ever since 2006), with the authority of the World Court).

This legislation, signed into law by President Clinton in March 2000, comes into effect when it is announced; and the primary objective of the Bush-Clinton-Cheney kleptocracy, especially since implementation of the Act was deliberately sabotaged by 9/11, has been to prevent at all costs this announcement ever happening – so that their secret financial rapine could continue indefinitely.

Information about the legislation, also known as the Reformation Act, is believed to have been leaked inter alia by Mark Delmart Vreeland, the Office of Naval Intelligence operative, in June 2000 (unverified). This matter has everything to do with the stealing of the 2000 Presidential Election, and with the known fact that Bush Jr's nickname has been said to have been 'Temporary', as he was supposed to have stepped down after six months, to make way for The Reformation Act, which was later rescheduled for 10.00am on 11th September 2001.

Under NESARA, Constitutional Law (the US Rule of Law) is restored and all traces of any fake virtual, or ‘shadow’ (Fascist) fraudulent governance system that lacks all legitimacy, and which has been sending so many people into a state of convoluted frenzy, are defanged. All key members of the Administration du jour are removed, headed in the prevailing context by Bush, Cheney and the entire Cabinet; specified law enforcement personnel take over relevant Government offices, and the Federal Reserve and its personnel are absorbed into a new US Treasury Bank System, as was discussed earlier in Wantagate reports.

As noted, the Reformation Act was to have been announced at 10 a.m. EDT on 11th September 2001, but the buildings were blown up shortly before 9.00 a.m. that day, murdering an unknown number of people. Thus the 9/11 abominations were much ‘worse’ than the Reichstag Fire event of 1933 to which they have been compared.

For this was nothing less than a deliberate, carefully prepared and orchestrated atrocity committed by the criminalist US ‘shadow government’ possibly with foreign criminal intelligence input, against the people and property of the United States, designed to forestall the intended Reformation Act announcements so that the corrupt banksterism carousel could continue. Actually, the PRIMARY objective of the criminalist cadres for years has been to cover up all traces of their criminality.

Among those murdered on 9/11 were over 650 members of the staff of the money-broker Cantor Fitzgerald, holder of a sizeable portfolio of original derivatives contract documents, which were destroyed along with the firm’s New York personnel. The destruction of the contracts eliminated the imminent prospect and danger of part of the fraudulent finance carousel being terminated, thereby removing immediate impediments to the further creation of hidden, untaxed fiat money proceeds from stolen contracts and by means of other financial fraud operations.

The Editor does not believe the official tally of approximately 3,000 9/11 victims. His reason for this scepticism is that when he attended at our New York branch office in Midtown Manhattan in the second half of October 2001, the stench of rotting flesh was nauseating, even though Ground Zero was perhaps two miles away from our office. There could be no possibility that 3,000 rotting human corpses could have been responsible for that stench. In February 2001, when he again attended at the New York branch office, the stench had hardly abated at all, depending on the direction of the wind. It is said that Staten Island became almost uninhabitable for some time, so horrible was the pervasive smell of rotting flesh.

The Editor’s opinion is therefore that the 3,000 figure is fabricated, and that the probable number of those murdered in that abomination could very well have been as high as ten times that number. This suspicion was further supported by the impossibility of obtaining any authoritative figures on this subject at all, although we tried for several months to do so.

We recall that by November 2001, all enquiries about casualty rates and about the numbers of staff at businesses located in the World Trade Center were conspicuously leading nowhere. Further, by the end of 2001, significant numbers of US operatives who had been involved or ‘in the loop’, were reported to us to be ‘drinking heavily’. Their sleep was probably haunted, too.

The immediate, knee-jerk finger-pointing at Osama Bin Laden – the CIA asset ‘Tim Osman’, a crude character dressed in a sheet who appeared in a series of ghoulish videos thought to have been filmed in the Las Vegas area – had to be played down after he died on 26th December 2001 in a Midwest hospital, believed to have been located in or near Minneapolis.

The post-9/11 speed with which Bush Jr. dispatched military formations to Afghanistan, and the ongoing preparations for the unprovoked and illegal attack on Iraq, can be explained by a factor that has so far been completely overlooked. The National Economic Security and Reformation Act abolishes unconstitutional states of emergency – since it ‘restores’ the Constitution and the Rule of Law – which means that the American military, which has been deployed illegally, could no longer remain operative in Afghanistan and Iran.

By inventing these evil and destructive wars, the Bush Crime Family and its associates procured what they imagined would serve as a back-stop to prevent any possibility of the Reformation Act being imposed in a ‘worst case’ scenario. Yet they face their 'worst case scenario' 'as we speak'.

Put another way, the practical realities of the massive military deployments have served the back-stop’ purpose, from the perspective of the cadre of US Luciferian operatives who perpetrated or orchestrated the 9/11 abominations, of supposedly ‘precluding’ the possibility of an announcement of the Reformation Act and the consequent ‘restoration’ of the Constitution and the Rule of Law, in any ‘normal’ situation. Yet because the Kriminalreich has since been so decisively cornered as a consequence of the endless fraudulent finance exposures spearheaded inter alia by Wantagate, the situation facing the official criminal perpetrators and their associates today is the very reverse of ‘normal’. People were being rounded up, starting on Sunday 27th April 2008.

The steady ratcheting up of Cheney's virtual ‘wars and rumours of wars’ propaganda may have represented a coordinated operation to create a diversionary military ‘virtual/real’ standoff – to mask the truth that the criminalists are facing their days of reckoning, at last.

Tellingly, the fact that three US aircraft carriers – USS Kitty Hawk, USS Nimitz and USS Abraham Lincoln – were reported on the 26th April to be leaving the South China Sea en route for the Gulf implied that Madame Wu’s power and Writ of Execution had finally prevailed over the Bush-centred kleptocracy, so that the show of force in the Far East, intended to exert subtle pressure on China not to act as Madame Wu has done, had both failed and had been abandoned.

The last option therefore remained the Middle East region; but with intensified pressure on senior personnel having started on 27th April, it seemed by that date that the global offensive to procure the Settlements and to repay funds stolen from China and other victims, was finally unstoppable.

Nevertheless it remained possible, in our view, that, having been decisively defeated over his serial financial scamming and thefts at long last, President George W. Bush, if allowed to remain in office (perhaps a big IF), might seek a display of machismo abroad precisely in order to mask his humiliating defeat and to signal to the jaded world that the United States remains a brutalised and recalcitrant military bully capable of, for instance, ‘annihilating Iran’ – to use the satanic words of Mrs Jezebel Rodomski Clinton, uttered in some desperation on Tuesday, 22nd April.

There is also a great deal of rumour-mongering about activation of the concentration camps, special orders to the wives of US military personnel to stock up with non-perishables, and other 'information', all of which appears to have one factor in common: THE INFORMATION IS 'VIRTUAL' For 'virtual' information, read 'lies and diversionary obfuscation propaganda'.

To recapitulate important information about the invasion of Iraq that we have published elsewhere, this was effectively a massive bank raid – the initial objective being to annexe the Central Bank of Iraq, steal its gold and currency, and then to change the management at Saddam Hussein’s ‘private’ institution, Rafidain Bank, estimated to have accumulated about $100 trillion in fiat money assets from high-yield trading programmes originally conducted, one may presume, with Saddam’s buddy George H. W. Bush and his cronies. After the gold and currency had been seized from the Central Bank, at least 100 (probably many more) special US operatives associated with that bank raid were massacred in a cynically pre-planned US operation designed to ensure that no information about the raid on the Central Bank of Iraq ever surfaced into the public domain.

The reason that the matter was not completely covered up is that information attributed to an eye-witness source became ‘attached’ to details ‘leaked’ by disgusted US personnel.

The Central Bank of Iraq was then ‘converted’ into a tame, controlled financial trading partner of Weltkriminalgesellschaft Bushe und Klintenstein, GmbH, as we have previously explained.

With trades being directed via the closed Inter Bank Settlement Fund controlled by the US Federal Reserve, hidden, untaxed trading operations could continue below the radar without scrutiny. After this service exposed this dimension of the financial corruption exploiting the Central Bank of Iraq directed from the White House, four floors at the Central Bank of Iraq were suddenly gutted by fire (in January 2008), amid rumours circulating within Iraq itself that some $800 billion of the Central Bank’s assets had ‘gone missing’, believed to have been transferred to Switzerland.

It was on 22nd April, too, that we established that the primary high-level kleptocrats who had been trying to obtain their World Court/ICJ immunities (implying that they knew that the game was over), were encountering appropriate resistance and were being frustrated in their demands. As one well informed observer put it to us: ‘It’s not going too well for them’.

The same source stated that ‘there are spheres that will not be granted immunity’. It was on that Tuesday that Hillary Clinton, of Russian Jewish extraction, uttered her hysterical public statement to the effect that ‘if Iran touches Israel, I will annihilate it’. Seen in context, this may have been an appeal to her Israeli friends to come to her assistance, given the calamity she now faced (and we are not talking about her nauseating televised set-piece performances on the hustings).

It was also learned on that date that Madame Wu, who was in Washington all that week, having arrived there on Monday 21st April, would be insisting on the arrests taking place – and that she would not hesitate to execute her World Court Writ by seizing, on behalf of her Government, the international community and The Queen, the 20 US banks designated for seizure, along with the Fed and the Treasury, in the event of any further prevarication by the US Forces of Darkness.

In the event, as noted, it transpired that the multiple third party verification process, which was said to make it impossible for the official and bankster mafiosi to renege, meant that the sequence was taking 'a little longer' to complete – since for practical reasons, the necessary extraordinary third-party verification and confirmation procedures could not be commenced until Monday 28th April, as already noted. It is true that a great deal of time has elapsed since then, and that all that talk about Madame Wu exercising her Writ of Execution has disappeared out the window.

But we are still informed by our best sources that the information blackout is deliberate, because as well as covering their tracks, the criminalists are hoping that this scandal will stay confined within the Fifth Estate and in International Currency Review.

According to pre-Sarkozy French intelligence, this website collected up to 50 million readers per Wantagate report at one stage, given that 948,000 websites were taking the Wantagate reports, then disseminated by French intelligence, and that each report was attracting some 50,000 hits.

That meant that our readership was 55 times greater than that of, for instance, The Daily Telegraph. Therefore, any suggestion that this huge crisis has been contained and successfully controlled is a figment of the Kriminalreich's disturbed imagination.

International tension surrounding the delayed Settlements arose from the determination of corrupt US official and bankster cadres to continue the carousel based upon the debt-financing model that has in fact hollowed out the financial integrity of the United States ever since establishment of the Federal Reserve System in 1913.

President Kennedy understood that the then foreign-owned Federal Reserve Board (the foreign shares in which are believed to have been redeemed in 2006), had to be subsumed by the Treasury if the United States was not to wind up as bankrupt as any nation state can ever become – which, in practical terms, meant that an ever larger proportion of tax revenues would need to be allocated to servicing the colossal mountain of debt behind the US Treasury’s accounts.

Specifically, President Kennedy is believed to have reasoned that by means of a formal ‘return’ to the US Constitution, which requires only Congress to be empowered to coin, print and to regulate money, the one-way escalation of the Treasury’s background (or ‘national’) debt could be reduced because it would cease to be necessary to pay interest to the privately owned US Federal Reserve System, which has an old contract with the United States to print paper money and to lend it to the Government at interest. On 4th June 1963, President Kennedy therefore signed Executive Order 11110, calling for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the US Treasury rather than by the Federal Reserve System. On the same date, President Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of the one- and two-dollar bills (then in wide circulation) from silver to gold, buttressing the weakened US currency’s intrinsic value.

These wise decisions appear to have been influenced by Kennedy’s voracious reading and his consequent understanding of American history – and in particular by the complaints about the Federal Reserve ventilated by Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee in the 1930s. According to The Congressional Record for 10th June 1932 (pages 1295 and 1296), McFadden made the following statement on the floor of the House of Representatives:

‘Mr Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions that the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt'.

'The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government'.

'It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board was established, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it’.

When President Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, his intention was to strip the Federal Reserve of its power to lend money to the US Federal Government at interest, which has to be financed through tax revenues.

Research recently conducted by the Christian Law Fellowship through the Federal Register and at the Library of Congress, has definitively established that Kennedy’s Executive Order 11110 has never been repealed, amended or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order.

This Executive Order gave the US Treasury explicit authority ‘to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury’.

As a consequence, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were placed into circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. United States Notes in $10 and $20 denominations were never circulated but were being printed by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing when Kennedy was assassinated.

Present in Dallas for the assassination on 22nd November 1963 was George Herbert Walker Bush, who is persistently suspected of having been involved in that traumatic outrage against the US Head of State and the American people, on behalf of the private money power and of Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst (ongoing Nazi ‘Black’ strategic planning and counterintelligence, Dachau).

As soon as Kennedy had been assassinated, the United States Notes that he had enabled to be issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Furthermore, just five months after President Kennedy was assassinated, no more of the Series 1958 ‘Silver Certificates’ were issued, either.

They were subsequently removed from circulation.

Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes (USNs) achieved wide circulation, they would have eliminated demand for Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs), because while the USNs were backed by silver, the FRNs were backed by nothing.

Given that almost all of the $9.0 trillion of Federal debt (as inaccurately reported) has been created since 1963, Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the United States’ enormous national debt (as inaccurately reported) from reaching its current level. The US Federal Government would have gained the ability to repay its accumulated ‘background debt’ without in fact needing to have recourse to the Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new ‘money’ (5), (6).

The ‘Wanta Plan’, as originally conceived, would have achieved part of the same objective, by generating taxed, on-the-books windfall accruals on such a scale as to enable the Treasury to pay down its ‘background debt’ within just a few years.

However, partly as a consequence of an approach made in April 2006 to Coutts Bank in London, at the Editor’s suggestion, by Wanta Attorney Steven D. Goodwin, equipped with a Power of Attorney, and a similar approach made in the same month by the Editor of this service with a restricted Power of Attorney to Lloyds Bank, Aylesbury – both being institutions which the Editor had identified from his analysis of the Leo Wanta banking documents in the public domain as holding Wanta corporate accounts – it may be deduced that the funds held in Wanta accounts have since been repatriated.

The aggregated expanded value of the Wanta accounts, based on the original Wanta $27.5 trillion, is believed to be of the order of $300 trillion – which ‘just happens’ to be the estimated aggregate value of the long delayed Settlements.

Almost immediately after our fully Wanta-authorised approaches to the mentioned UK banks, which signaled to the Weltkriminalgesellschaft GmbH that they were no longer in control of the timetable, Leo E. Wanta travelled to California, returning with information about the ‘compromise’ $4.5 trillion Settlement that we then publicised for 23 months on his behalf and with his enthusiastic support, witnessed by successive batches of documents that were faxed by Leo Wanta to the Editor of this service, often labelled URGENT in large capital letters, as is displayed in International Currency Review. But of course, the moment that Wanta accepted this hazardous ‘compromise’, he found himself at the mercy of duplicitous US intelligence and Treasury operatives, who duly hijacked the funds and incorporated them into their own trading platform operations, as we reported. After all, payment of the $4.5 trillion was now a metter for THEM, whereas collection of the $27.5 trillion from the bank accounts, many of which we have listed, could have been masterminded by Wanta alone, if they were 'his' accounts, as was the case according to the documentation we have published.

On Monday 28th April 2008, then, verification and confirmation by the US banks in accordance with their Basel-II requirements as promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board in its undated 408-page document made available last November (7), was stated to be proceeding, driven not least by the formidable pressure being exerted by the international community and by the Writ of Execution wielded inter alia by Madame Wu, the Chinese Finance Minister. Given that it is no simple matter to manoeuvre colossal sums of money onto the books, completion was, as noted, taking longer than even Madame Wu and MI6 may have anticipated.

Obviously, given the endless deception that has characterised every stage of this crisis, we are all entitled to remain sceptical: but our very best sources still insist that matters are still proceeding correctly. If this turns out to be inaccurate, we know that certain powerful people who are in direct touch with us all the time, intend to release intelligence which will make it impossible for any of the highest-level US criminalists to escape what is coming to them. These contacts are threatening to release this information: and we urge them to do so if they believe they are still being lied to.

They should NOT allow this matter to drift into June. Send the information to us.

Assuming that a timetable was being adhered to, that left the month of May 2008 for the possible introduction, by proclamation, of the Reformation Act, and the related replacement of the Bush-Cheney Administration and the Bush II Cabinet by an Interim Authority in the course of this month, allowing for the six-month period stipulated in the legislation during which an Interim Authority would rule the United States, before a general election must take place.

This would procure that the election could occur, as usual, in early November – thereby appearing to ensure a smooth transition from the corrupt, unconstitutional state of affairs that has brought the pariah United States to the verge of de facto bankruptcy, back to Constitutional Government and the Rule of Law. Since we are now approaching the half-way mark of May 2008, however, it looks as though Act Two – the refurbishment of the stables after all the dung has been thrown out – has got stuck somewhere inside the Beltway.

It would be illogical for the United States to have been compelled by the international community, with the assistance of powerful forces within the United States itself that have been seeking the restoration of the Rule of Law, to adopt the Basel-II banking reforms, allowing the US banks just 100 days within which their affairs must be reordered – without completing the job by proceeding with the Reformation Act, or some other measure capable of delivering the same beneficial outcome.

The mechanics of any such operation, we were advised, might involve a complete but temporary communications blackout, followed by the NESARA announcements, which would inform the public that President Bush, his Vice President, the Cabinet and leading officials had been removed from office, accompanied by extensive arrests (which, as noted earlier, started on Sunday 27th April), and that, under the legislation, an Interim Authority had been installed – charged with supervising completion of the return to the Constitution and the Rule of Law.

Promulgation and implementation of the Reformation Act would indeed represent Act Two of Die Meisterschwindlern. It has separately been put to the Editor of this service that Act Two might be procured ‘by other means’ and in a less obvious fashion.

We do remain to be convinced that ANYONE in the United States has the will and the guts to do what is necessary to save the Republic from this criminalist offensive, orchestrated inter alia by malevolent foreign powers, and to procure that Act One is followed promptly by a comprehensive cleansing of the filthy stables. Cleaning out the pigstie is only a first stage. The walls. floor and general structure then have to be disinfected and made good.

Making a mockery of democracy by means of a corrupt and manipulated election ‘peacock process’, amplified via the ‘virtual reality/TV’ system, hardly appears to indicate that the necessary harsh will to follow through exists inside the structures where it matters.

Even so, as the Editor left New York to return to London on 29th April 2008, he was informed that 4,000 troops were said to be guarding the President and the Vice President. This could have been interpreted as implying that their lives were in danger, which, given the immensity of their endless financial criminality, must undoubtedly be the case.

But, along with the steady edging up of the US dollar’s external value – attributable both to actual movements of money and to ‘informed’ Wall Street sentiment – and a general sense on both sides of the Atlantic that much more liquidity would soon become available, we were advised during the week ending on 9th May that colossal amounts of money were being moved, with the key Central Banks engaged on a huge scale, as confirmed by one of our sources with access to 'the screens'.

The funds have had to be placed ONTO THE BOOKS, prior to the disbursement of the settlement payments, since ‘source of funds’, under Basel-II, has to be transparent – as in the US securities sector. Further, issues that the Editor and Mr Cottrell have discussed on transatlantic phone lines, have started to ‘go mainstream’, while at the other end of the spectrum, anecdotal evidence of hit squads ‘taking out’ enemies, which was always anticipated at this stage of the process – just as happened in 1992 – was being reported.

Such ‘information’, however, could not be reliably disentangled from the desperate obfuscation operations and false reports perpetrated by criminalised disinformation cadres, as they came to terms with the magnitude of the exposures that they never thought could occur.

The intended refinancing of the United States and the world economy to the tune of $300 trillion fully justifies, for instance, Gordon Brown’s ‘bet’ on a ‘significant upturn’. This was not a bet at all: for the British Prime Minister has been fully briefed on the biggest global refinancing in world history, all along, both as an intelligence operative and because of his current position.

In terms of UK domestic politics, this would mean, incidentally, that it would be premature in the extreme for the Conservative Party, which has no discernible policies apart from a sterile, mind-controlled embrace of empty-headed ‘political correctness’, to ‘bank’ on Brown and his disaffected colleagues being crushed beyond repair by recent financial and related economic developments. On the contrary, Brown’s fortunes may improve radically.

On Wednesday 7th May, the Editor of this service received a sudden telephone call asking to know the whereabouts of the Vice President of the United States. Why would Brit know the answer to this question? As it turned out, the Editor was actually able to report, within ten minutes, what he was immediately told by an informed US source: ‘Cheney is in Philadelphia and the riot act is being read to him right now’. This information was fed back to the source of the question in the United States.

By late evening UK time on 8th May, when there was still no news of the releases, the sense was that Cheney may yet again have bribed one or more parties to stall the payments. That is always possible, of course, but there was no confirmation. A further piece of nonsense surfaced to the effect that the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, who is a key globalist 'Dark Forces' player, has some strife going on with respect to who is likely to be the first President of Europe, and that he insists it cannot be allowed to be Blair. We were told, nonsensically, that this latest red herring had interfered with the payments. Next, we will be told that a spider or a cockroach got inside the main giant computer at the European Operations Centre and caused an electronic glitch.

The alleged (virtual) struggle between Messrs Sarkozy and Blair over who is to be President of the moribund corpse of the European Union Collective is probably an orchestrated disinformation ploy perpetrated as usual by the Cheney lie machine – which also perpetrated the lie (on 7th May) that Bush Jr. and Cheney had received their coveted immunities: a typical Cheney lie that we discount totally, although it is always possible that Cheney has used bribery in THIS context: why would the World Court/ICJ give them immunity, which would ‘allow’ them to continue their criminal operations sine die? On 7th May, the Editor was informed, too, that Cheney’s lie machine had disseminated various further lies, such as that a certain Trustee that we know about, had been paid, which we knew NOT to be true – not least since no-one will be able to move any funds at all until everyone has been paid. In addition, we knew that the Trustee in question had not been paid. Now we were fed this nonsense about Sarkozy wanting the Presidency of Europe for himself, in lieu of Blair.

Just for the record, no position of ‘President’ of the moribund EU Collective is vacant, because it doesn’t exist. To begin with, the very prominent British businessman (and contemporary of the Editor’s at Christ Church, Oxford), Stuart Wheeler, has successfully obtained a judicial review of Gordon Brown’s nefarious decision to deny the British people a referendum on the anti-nation state Lisbon Collective Treaty, so that Britain’s position vis-à-vis this Pan-German entrapment device to destroy Britain’s statehood is ‘up in the air’.

Secondly, the Irish have not yet voted in their referendum on the notorious Treaty, while the Upper House in the Czech Republic has serious doubts about the Treaty’s legality and has referred the matter to its Constitutional Court. The same has happened in Germany, of all countries. Therefore, ratification of Lisbon is a long way off, and may be aborted altogether – like its ‘predecessor, the European Constitution Treaty.

Accordingly, we can dismiss this latest red herring for what it is – namely, yet another lie from the Cheney disinformation camp, which in any case just happens to turn the truth of the matter on its head. For, contrary to what was implied, M. Sarkozy has, after a slow start, been pressing for the conclusion of the Settlements, in support of Her Majesty The Queen (who wowed him and his new wife at the Palace), Madame Wu, and all the other distinguished representatives of the financial community with the single exception of the recalcitrant United States.

It is much harder to read what the political outcome in the United States of any actual completion of the Settlements is likely to be. Among reasons for this are the following:

The ongoing, wall-to-wall intensity of perverse disinformation, diversionary reporting and wilful deception perpetrated by the criminalised US intelligence sector under Operation Mockingbird and the manipulation of the Fifth Estate (the Internet sector) (8) to mask the headlong involvement of criminal intelligence in fraudulent finance, makes it almost impossible for ordinary Americans to discern truth from CIA lies. Until this monstrous Intelligence Power is defanged, the American Republic will remain in great danger, and the political system will continue to be managed and rigged for the exclusive benefit of the kakocracy and its intelligence community manipulators.

At the time of going to press/this posting, it was unclear how comprehensive the obvious defeat of the US criminalist cadres was likely to be. Are the stables going to be fumigated, or are they just going to be tidied up for routine Department of Agriculture inspections, enabling the Settlements to be surreptitiously exploited, under the cover of a ‘front operation’ that will be compliant with the Rule of Law, to kick-start a further round of fraudulent finance – as implied by the aforementioned denial of the Editor’s request for a written confirmation that all Wanta transactions would comply with the Rule of Law? On the one hand, the informed expectation that none of the perpetrators will be allowed to ‘get away with it’, is encouraging.

But on the other hand, while Mrs Clinton, the candidate of the Dark Forces, remains on the ticket for the Presidency (not much longer, surely, unless they ‘do something’ to Mr Obama, which would not be beyond ‘them’ at all), the criminalist cadres can be relied upon to rest their rapidly vanishing hopes of ‘business as usual’ on this Jezebel becoming President.

Likewise, it remained unclear at this posting whether the massive stables cleansing job (Act One of Die Meisterschwindlern) would remain half done, with the second phase, or Act Two – formal and decisive restoration of Constitutional Governance and the US Rule of Law – realised, for instance, through an imminent announcement of the Reformation Act and its consequences, or by means of some other beneficial measure implemented by a corrupt and self-interested Congress motivated by a wish, finally, to cover its own tracks by acting at last in the interests of the American people.

Unless this, or a measure to the same decisive and lasting effect, is implemented in the immediate future, final completion of the financial releases and Settlements will be liable to refinance not only the US and world economies, but the battered Weltkriminalgesellschaft, as well.

Which would mean that although America’s ‘Main Enemy’ – Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst, Dachau, the Nazi strategic deception continuum driven by its old slogans ‘we shall build the Thousand-Year Reich upon the ruins of the United States ’ (9) and ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Krieg niemals vorbei’) (10) – has been severely wounded, it may yet survive to regroup and repeat its mad Luciferian offensive to procure revenge for its catastrophic defeats in two World Wars.

The de facto refinancing the US and world financial economies must not be allowed to provide new cover for a simultaneous and surreptitious refinancing of the Weltkriminalgesellschaft, its corrupt and amoral ‘Black’ intelligence community controllers and those pathetic and misguided Luciferian globalist ‘Dark Actors Playing Games’ who vainly seek to set themselves up as gods purportedly controlling the future of humanity. It remains touch and go whether America will pull itself together in time to prevent these despicably evil people regaining the initiative, which they lost, we believe, partly – or even mainly – thanks to Wantagate.

Notes and References:
1. ‘Containing Systemic Risks and Restoring Financial Stability’, Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, April 2008.

2. See ‘G-7 demands immediate US discipline and compliance: World community stands up to Bush crime network’, report on this website, Saturday 12th April 2008, filed by the Editor overnight from the IMF/World Bank Press Room in Washington, DC.

3. London Archaeology, Spring 2008, Volume 11, Number 12, pages 312-318.

4. ‘Election Pain for Brown as Tories march on’, lead report, front page, The Daily Telegraph, Monday, 2nd May 2008: final two paragraphs.

5. Report by Anthony Wayne, for Lawgiver.org, The Christian Law Fellowship, April 2008.

6. Executive Order 11110:

Amendment of Executive Order No. 10289 as amended, relating to the performance of certain functions affecting the Department of the Treasury. By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

SECTION 1: Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): “(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of Section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 USC 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption, and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof;

SECTION 2: The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.


7. Basel II Final Rules, Federal Reserve Board Open Board Meeting, November 2, 2007, 10 a.m. EDT. On page 1, this document states: ‘DATES: This final rule is effective [INSERT DATE]’. As we reported on the website report dated 17th April 2008, ‘Global Refinancing Settlements Intelligence Update: US dragged kicking and screaming into Basel-II mode’, ‘The United States was dragged kicking and screaming like a spoilt child in overdue need of a diaper change into the Basel-II mode with effect from 12:01 am on Monday 14th April, as expected'.

'US institutions now have 100 days to reorder their affairs to comply in all respects with the Basel-II requirements, as agreed within the international financial community. This represents a massive defeat for the two-headed Luciferian Government of the United States led by criminal operatives President George W. Bush Jr. and his ‘Himmler’ character, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, and their cynical criminalist ‘Box Gang’ co-conspirators’.

8. It has just been revealed that two particularly egregious disinformation platforms – the Sorcha Faal reports purporting to represent postings from inside the Kremlin, but which are revealed to be perpetrated by a US military intelligence operative working with an Irish source (i.e., for the Clinton component of the criminalist ‘Box Gang’), and the website www.whatdoesitmean.com, are American deception operations.

That website has been exposed by the research given below. A list of suspect and intelligence-controlled websites is given on page 512 of the Editor’s work, ‘The New Underworld Order: Dark Actors Playing Games: The Global Fantasies of the Geomasonic Illuminati’: Edward Harle Limited: see the books section of this integrated website.

Exposure of a subversive CIA-controlled website:

Server: whois.register.com
Referral URL: [link to www.register.com]
Name Server: NS2.SERVINT.COM
Status: ok
Updated Date: 13-Nov-2007
Creation Date: 12-Nov-2003
Expiration Date: 12-Nov-2009
Current Registrar: REGISTER.COM, INC.
IP Address: (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
Record Type: Domain Name
Server Type: Indeterminate
Lock Status: ok
DMOZ: no listings
Y! Directory: see listings
Web Site Title: WhatDoesItMean.Com
Secure: No
E-commerce: No
Traffic Ranking: 4
Data as of: 27-Jul-2005
[link to www.networksolutions.com]
[link to www.internic.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 195267 (OP)
Data sent to the Editor: 5/4/2008 4:00 AM
Re: Top CIA Agent Killed Trying To Protect D.C. Madam
IP Location: US, McLean, Virginia. Contrary to popular belief, the CIA headquarters is not located in Langley, VA, but in the Langley suburb of McLean,Virginia.

9. ‘We shall build the Thousand-Year Reich on the Ruins of the United States’, one of the rallying cries formulated by the German Geopolitical Centre (Abwehr: Nazi counterintelligence) in Madrid, discovered in Nazi documents seized by the Allies in the final days of the Second World War.

10. ‘For us the war never ended’ (‘Für uns ist der Kreig niemals vorbei’) was accompanied by the elaboration: ‘and as is known, in war, everything is permitted’. This slogan was a key theme of the so-called ‘Madrid Circular Letter’, a document circulated by the Nazi intelligentsia from the German Geopolitical Centre, Madrid, in the early 1950s. The Editor believes that such intelligence, which would have alerted US policymakers to the likelihood that the Cold War had provided the Nazis with long-range cover, was suppressed by the State Department.

Please be advised that the Editor of International Currency Review cannot enter into email correspondence related to this or to any of the earlier reports.

We are a private intelligence publishing house and have no connections to any outside parties including intelligence agencies. The word ‘intelligence’ on this website and in all our marketing material is used for marketing/sales purposes only and has no other connotations whatsoever: see ‘About Us’ on the red panels under the Notes on the Editor, Christopher Story FRSA, who has been solely and exclusively engaged as an investigative journalist, Editor, Author and private financial and current affairs Publisher since 1963 and is not and never has been an agent for a foreign power, suggestions to the contrary being actionable for libel in the English Court.


Bpath Compteur