http://www.sott.net/articles/show/148240-When-Osama-Bin-Ladin-Was-Tim-Osman  nov2001

 

"We found the mobiles used to detonate the women"

Now let's just think about this for a moment. First of all, this suggests that the women did not have control over the bombs they were allegedly carrying. Why not? If they were indeed gripped by some vengeful fervor against ordinary Iraqis, and willing to sacrifice their lives to "stop the march of history and of [the Iraqi] people toward reconciliation" why would they not have been allowed to choose the best time to detonate their explosives in a crowded market place?

Secondly, how in the name of Yahweh could anyone claim to have found the mobile phones used to detonate the explosives? There were likely dozens of people at the market carrying phones, none of which would be identifiable as the phones that detonated the explosives. Furthermore, if the phones were on the women's bodies, they they would surely have been blown to pieces along with the market-goers.

.............................

Contemplating the good Major General's unbelievable claim of crime scene evidence, I am immediately reminded of the claim that the passport of alleged Flight 11 hijacker Satam Al Suqami, that he was supposedly carrying when he the plane stuck WTC 1, was later miraculously found in almost pristine condition on a sidewalk hundreds of yards from the point of impact.

The mystery deepens when we read that some unnamed Iraqi puppet police officer initially said that the bomb at the market was hidden in a "box of birds" and that only later was it determined to be a "suicide attack". Why the change in story? Well, the 'damning evidence' that made this yet another case of exploding Iraqi women was that a head, somehow determined to be theexploding Iraqi woman's head, was found at the scene. Supposedly someone sifted through several heads and other body parts belonging to the dozens of victims before deciding on the best fit.

What happened today at al-Ghazl market in Baghdad has happened countless times across Iraq over the course of the past 5 years. It was not a case of a "suicide bomber" but rather dozens of innocent Iraqi civilians being "suicided" by an unknown party. Iraqi and US officials, well-versed by now in the drill, immediately proclaimed a "suicide bombing" and placed the blame on some variation of "al-Qaeda in Iraq". It really is a pretty simple three step operation:

Explosives are covertly placed in an area prior to a scheduled gathering of Iraqi civilians.

An unknown party observes the scene from a distance.

At a point where a significant number of people have gathered around the area of the hidden explosives, and when a new shopper enters the area, the unknown party remotely detonates the explosives (possibly by mobile phone signal).

There is no need for any actual suicide bomber because that last person to move close to the area of the hidden explosives becomes, according to eyewitnesses, becomes the accidental "suicide bomber" reported by the mainstream media. Today it was two innocent women wearing burkas.

Thanks to the Israeli, US and British governments and the Western mainstream media, the concept of the suicide bomber has become embedded in the Western mind as the chief tactic of "Muslim terrorists". It is strange therefore to consider that there is no history of this tactic being use in the Muslim world prior to 2000. In fact the concept of the "suicide bomb" or rather the "suiciding" of an unwilling person, seems to have been born back in the early nineties, thousands of miles from the Muslim world, in Northern Ireland to be exact: (...)

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/148200-Burka-Bombers-Spontaneously-Exploding-Iraqi-Women  sott focus