PAULSON DIVERSION MASKED THEFT OF $44+ TRILLION
......TREASURY SHOOTINGS AND DC 'CIVIL WAR' CONFIRMED
Wednesday 9 January 2008 03:54
THE STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMED THAT PAULSON DIED: BUSH CONTRADICTED THEM
CITIBANK ORDERED TO SETTLE TODAY, OR ITS ASSETS WILL BE SEIZED AND FROZEN
WASHINGTON BLOODBATH WILL CONTINUE IF SETTLEMENTS KEEP BEING FRUSTRATED
SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE CENSORED FROM THIS REPORT, PENDING SETTLEMENT TODAY
• SEE 26TH DECEMBER REPORT FOR FINANCIAL FRAUDS BEHIND THE 'SUBPRIME' CRISIS
• SEE 5TH JANUARY REPORT FOR DATA AND IDENTITY THEFT SCAMMING CRISIS
• PLEASE READ THE VERY IMPORTANT INTRODUCTION APPENDED TO THIS REPORT
By Christopher Story FRSA, Editor and Publisher, International Currency Review, World Reports Limited, London and New York: www.worldreports.org.
INTRODUCTION: THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT
The Editor prepared the report below in order to expose the background
to the entire Paulson episode and to place it in the context of what
was really going on behind the scenes. In a case moving as rapidly as
this one, a report prepared yesterday is overtaken by events today, and
vice versa. Luckily, the Editor was too tired at 5.00am British time to
complete the posting of this report, because it became clear on the
morning of 9th January that the absolute end of the line had been
reached. Because of this understanding, we were in a much better
position to deconstruct what that Paulson matter was all about. We
summarise the position here in the context of today's news.
Paulson, Kimmitt and one further high US Treasury official WERE SHOT: that is CONFIRMED (see below).
........((The primary definitive source for our published statement
that Paulson was shot on 28th/29th December 2007 was Treasury
on the back of these horrible facts, Cheney's desperate disinformation
apparat built a 'Black Ops' 'sting', to the effect that Paulson was
dead. (We don't really know, despite 'postmortem appearances', whether
he is or not: but this is now a diversion: see what follows). Why,
given that the shootings took place, was it 'necessary' to build a
'sting' (a possible 'lie' that Paulson was dead) on the back of that
fact? The answer to this has now become clear. It is this:
• Post-settlement, THERE IS TO BE ENDLESS
SILENCE. The few despised 'alternative media' outlets that have tried
to expose this historically unprecedented financial criminality are to
be left out to dry. Now, in the cases of several outlets based in the
United States, the relevant 'forces' can do any number of things: cease
payments, withdraw handlers, harrassment, threats, whatever. But what
can they do to silence us (within reason, and given our background and
connections)? The answer is: NOT A LOT. So, as usual, 'they' resort to
the only game 'they' know: DIRTY TRICKS.
• Since 'they' want total silence to reign
for ever, and a veil to be drawn across this evil, stinking theatre of
criminality, the ideal solution for them would be to try to discredit
the only sources that have led this hideous information into the public
domain. So they tried it on, by elaborating on the shootings and
possibly lying that Paulson had died. (We still don't know what
happened to Kimmitt, by the way: see hard evidence of something very
As you will see from the report below, this 'sting' operation has not
succeeded. Furthermore, post-settlement, the question remains: what are
they going to do about Mr Christopher Story?
Here is a suggestion: RELY ON HIS GOODWILL. No, we won't be silenced.
But, as you will also see below, we DO try to be helpful whenever we
can. We will govern our responses in accordance with the future
behaviour of the 'forces' who would like to shut us down without a
cause. All we have ever done is, pro bono publico, to publish the truth
about hidden criminality at the intergovernmental level that stinks in
the nostrils of every normal human being who is not sitting on his or
NOW, please take note of THIS. In the text below, you will
see that a section, which was to contain extremely sensitive
intelligence, HAS BEEN CENSORED.
This has happened because the Editor and Mr Cottrell were discussing
this article yesterday and incorporated certain sensitive information
which needs to be delivered into the public domain, and which will have
devastatingly severe consequences behind the scenes were it to be
The eavesdroppers overheard what we had planned, and telephoned Mr
Cottrell this morning to ask him to prevail upon the Editor for the
intelligence to be withheld. The Editor has COMPLIED, but ONLY on the
clear, strict understanding that the Wanta Settlement, which we believe
may well be on the verge of implementation, is indeed effected TODAY,
9TH JANUARY 2008.
should it transpire later today that we have been deceived, the
intelligence that has been censored from this report will be reinserted
without further ado, since we will not be bound by any undertaking if
other parties have reneged on theirs, or double-crossed payees yet
DECONSTRUCTING THE PAULSON DIVERSION
On January 8th 2008
a figure appearing to be Henry M. Paulson Jr., Secretary of the US
Treasury, appeared on CNBC talking about the economy and related
The voice appeared to correspond closely to Paulson’s known voice.
Whether this individual was Paulson or not is not confirmed, especially
in the light of forensic examination of video footage of the event, and
of earlier ‘postmortem appearances’ not dealt with here; but the TV
show purported to be broadcast live.
Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., the Executive Vice President and Treasurer
of Ambassador Wanta’s AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc, therefore telephoned the
Editor to ask him whether he would publicise the sources of the
information that Paulson was shot and gravely wounded on 28th or 29th
December, and that he died shortly thereafter.
This is done below.
Peculiar to the
United States, a mini-industry of ‘doubles’ exists who hire themselves
out to stand in for prominent people who have either been killed or
who, for various pressing reasons, need to be ‘absent’ when they are
supposed to be ‘performing’. In an email received by the Editor
from an informed US source at 4:41pm UK time on 4th January 2008, on
the subject of doubles, the source wrote: ‘It would be interesting to
see if there is more than one Paulson running around. Lookalikes are
used a great deal for people in sensitive situations, because they get
murdered a lot, so they keep a spare, or use the spare in sensitive
Forensic deconstruction of earlier still photographs, video
and alleged ‘appearances’ raised serious doubts about the reliability
of some of the images, according to several experts who have shared
their analyses with us. However let us assume for that Paulson himself
was interviewed on CNBC at around 8.00am on 8th January. This
presentation assumes, subject to issues raised in the sources cited
below, that the ‘real’ Paulson had suddenly materialised for public
Furthermore, we had a contact who deliberately attended the ‘Paulson’
event at the Westin Hotel in New York City on 7th January, having paid
$20 entry fee. Although he sat at the back of the room, he thought that
the person speaking was indeed Henry M. Paulson.
WHY DID THE U.S. TREASURY NOT DEMAND A RETRACTION?
If this was indeed the case,
why did the US Treasury not demand from the Editor of this service an
immediate retraction of our report that Paulson had been shot,
and had subsequently died? One would have thought that Paulson’s office
would have seen to it that the report was denied. Why did Paulson’s
office not issue a denial of the report?
At no time has the report been officially denied. How very odd!
Thus it would seem that the US Treasury was in no way ‘phased’ by the
fact that Paulson had been reported to have been shot and had died. WHY
ON EARTH WAS THAT?
FACT: Treasury Compliance specifically confirmed that the following
official was shot by Special Forces operatives on 28/29th January:
• Henry M. Paulson, US Treasury Secretary.
UK time on 3rd January 2008, a source who is special to this service
emailed the Editor as follows: ‘I was told that an Undersecretary of
Treasury was also eliminated’ [sic]. We have separate confirmation of this, reviewed below. This email is of course held on file.
SHOOTING OF PAULSON CONFIRMED BY TREASURY COMPLIANCE
At 2.30pm UK time on 8th January 2008, Michael C. Cottrell M.S.,
speaking on an open transatlantic line that was immediately tapped into
by inquisitive intelligence eavesdroppers and so that these
eavesdroppers would hear what he had to say, specifically and
emphatically reiterated that US Treasury Compliance had definitively
confirmed the shootings (which were expert ‘pass-through’ shootings –
see below – at least, in the case of Paulson, assuming he ‘is alive’:
we have had no reports at this date of Kimmitt having been seen since
the shootings). Mr Cottrell repeated this information with great
emphasis for the benefit of the eavesdroppers. Mr Cottrell then added
that ‘what we could not confirm was that Paulson had died later’.
However the Editor had been separately informed by a source citing the US State Department that he had died (see below). If the ‘fact’ that Paulson haddied was a lie, it
was perpetrated deliberately by the US disinformation apparat, in order
to ‘sting’ the Editor and to try to compromise our exposures. This
desperate ruse has not worked.
On the contrary, it has compounded the perpetrators’ terminal problems, as you will see if you read what we have to say now.
Why, too, did the Paulson family not protest at the Editor’s report? Was Merritt Paulson, Mr Paulson’s son, resident at Lake Oswego, Oregon, not disturbed by this report? Apparently not.
Was the report not
officially denied by the Treasury, let alone the Paulson family,
because the US Government despises what its cynical officials call ‘the
alternative media’ to such an extent that it refuses to recognise its
Put another way: since the report appeared in the so-called
‘alternative media’, was it not worth denying simply because, by
definition, it could not be true?
If so, what is the problem? Why all the concern? Since the report
appeared in the ‘alternative media’, it supposedly cannot be true – the
reverse of the lie that if a report has not been published in the
so-called ‘mainstream’ (a.k.a., ‘sidestream’, or ‘latestream’) media,
it cannot be true either. Welcome to Operation Mockingbird.
'OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD' BLOCKS COVERAGE IN THE ‘MAINSTREAM’
Those correspondents who have flooded the Editor with emails complaining that the report cannot
be true because it hasn’t appeared in the ‘mainstream’ ....need
to look up Operation Mockingbird – the US criminal counterintelligence
community’s long-established media control programme, which has been
running for decades. Just type Operation Mockingbird into your
browser or Google and read all about it. This programme has for decades
successfully denied the American people the truth about issues that the criminal intelligence community, which controls the US Government, wishes to disguise or to obfuscate.
Therefore, rather than shoot the true messenger with the usual
knee-jerk response that ‘the report hasn’t been confirmed in the
mainstream, so it cannot be true’, serious students of the Dark Forces engaged in destroying America
should equip themselves with this background, if only to spare the
Editor and others who are trying to prevent the collapse at the hands
of these criminals, from being inundated by emailers who haven’t done
Of course, the preceding observations do not address the ‘post-mortem
appearances’ of Paulson, which is a separate issue, dealt with below.
REPORT COULD NOT BE DENIED BECAUSE THE SHOOTINGS TOOK PLACE.
As it turns out, THE TREASURY COULD NOT DENY OUR REPORT OF THE
SHOOTINGS, EVEN IF IT HAD BEEN SO INCLINED, BECAUSE IT WAS TRUE (as we
always knew to be the case).
What then happened was that the (supposedly) FALSE report that Paulson
had died, was used in a deliberate Cheney-directed ‘Black operation’ or
‘sting’ ordered by Bush 41 through Bush 43 and Cheney, to discredit the Editor of this service and the Principals, with the following
• To stall
our ongoing successful exposures of the financial criminality,
money-laundering, drug-trafficking and drug distribution operations of
the criminal cadres, ...... which have triggered the
ensuing investigations (backed by law enforcement, extensive ongoing
investigations, Grand Jury hearings, DOD Internal Affairs and other
relevant parties) of the continuing thefts,....... thereby enabling the criminalists to continue ‘business as usual’ behind the smokescreen of Paulson’s death.
• To provide cover for the stealing of $44 trillion plus that...... Mr Cottrell has confirmed to the Editor.... took place behind the hysteria of the Paulson death.
REASON THE GOVERNMENT WAS HAPPY WITH THE PAULSON DIVERSION.
Obviously, since the US Treasury did not DENY the shootings (because it
couldn’t, as they DID TAKE PLACE, as elaborated further below), the
Treasury WAS CONTENT FOR THE PAULSON FRENZY TO FEED ON ITSELF, for some
What was that reason?
It suited the criminal elements in the US Government for the reports to remain ‘out there’, diverting everyone’s attention ........ from what was actually going on behind the scenes, namely FURTHER GROSS THEFT AND LARCENY ........ perpetrated under
the control of Bush 41, Bush 43, and Cheney – who, you will recall, is
the master disinformation and US Psy-Ops operative who ‘formerly’
controlled the MK-Ultra and related programmes based upon Himmlerian
‘Black Operations’ techniques imported lock stock and barrel
.... by what soon became the (criminal) Central Intelligence Agency..... from ‘former’ Nazi Germany (the qualification ‘former’ being superfluous, given what is being exposed).
LANGLEY HQ BEARS THE NAME OF THE WORLD’S WORST CRIMINAL
Several years ago now, Langley, the headquarters of the Nazi-penetrated criminal enterprise that is devastating the whole world called the Central Intelligence Agency, was renamed the George Bush Center for Intelligence. By this means, George Bush Sr., the
world’s biggest crook,
formalised the absolute control over the CIA that he had wielded de
facto .... since becoming President Reagan’s Vice President
Think about it this way. Suppose there is such a phenomenon as an
intelligence ‘white hat’, and suppose that the ‘white hats’ were to
have reached the collective conclusion that George Bush Sr. is indeed
the most dangerous and ruthless criminal operative alive. What are they
now going to do about it, given that their HQ is named after the world’s biggest crook himself?
They are stuck – because, in seeking to distance the CIA from this
monster Godfather, they will have to acknowledge before world public
opinion that the CIA is itself the hideous criminal enterprise that we
all know it to be.
So what do they do? They decide that they cannot distance the CIA, and
themselves, from George Bush Sr. – the practical consequence of which
is that George Bush Sr. believes that he can do anything he likes, with
100% assumed certainty of perpetual impunity.
The CIA is the collective lackey, whether or not it has ever had second thoughts, of George Herbert Walker Bush Sr., DVD.
CIA ‘FURIOUS THAT IT HAS BEEN EXPOSED’.
At the same time, we were informed on 3rd January that the CIA is
furious because it has been exposed, and doesn’t know what to do. This
criminal enterprise never imagined that there would ever come a time
when it would have to deal with this problem. But the ongoing exposure
of the CIA consequent upon the criminal cadres’ grotesque mishandling
of Wantagate ......can only lead to calls for this
dangerous, reprobate and recalcitrant criminal enterprise, the
headquarters of which is named after the Godfather of criminal
godfathers, to be cut down to size or closed down.
Permanent closure is actually the only way that the poison seeping out
from Langley can ever be contained, and the world spared a truly
Why should the CIA be furious that it has been exposed, when the
exposure of its criminality has been achieved by this Wantagate
website, without any assistance at all from the controlled and
complacent ‘sidestream’ media?
Surely, the ‘alternative’ media – to use the pejorative phrase employed
by a US Treasury official whose rudeness to one of our correspondents
when he telephoned to establish Paulson’s status, was horrendous (1) –
can have no relevance in such matters. It doesn’t count.
What counts is supposed to be what we read in the (controlled)
‘mainstream’. The ‘alternative media’, by definition, cannot possibly
ever know anything. Why pay attention to it, then, Langley?
THE BASIC PAULSON FACTS
So, to summarise on Paulson
(further source details below):
1. Paulson was shot in the timeframe specified. This was definitively
confirmed by Treasury Compliance and was reconfirmed to the Editor of
this service on 8th January 2008 by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., with all
his extensive authority.
2. The shooting was undertaken by expert Special Forces marksmen who
are quite capable of ‘pass-through’ shots in accordance with their
instructions. Assuming that the intention was not to kill, its purpose
was to warn these operatives ..... that their monstrous treason
against the United States and the American people will no longer be
3. The death of Paulson was a lie (on the assumption, for the purposes
of this presentation, that he is not dead) which was then retailed on
Bush 41’s orders through a compliant grapevine and via the State
Department ...... in order to discredit the Editor of this service
and to trash our reporting. This ‘sting’ operation has been a failure.
4. In other words a ‘BLACK OPERATION’. a.k.a. ‘a sting’, was piggybacked onto the actual shootings that indeed took place.
This of course has all the hallmarks of Cheney,
a ruthless and singularly evil (MK-Ultra) operative who has known links
with several crime families in Chicago, and with at least one Judge in
Cook County, Illinois.
$44+ TRILLION STOLEN WHILE THE PAULSON FRENZY CONTINUED
Now, before reverting to the Paulson background and to our sources
apart from Treasury Compliance for the shootings report, what has been
going on .... while the distraction of the Paulson ‘death’ was
consuming the minds of half the planet?
Having completed the relevant investigations, Mr Cottrell informed the
Editor in the course of the telephone call timed at 2.30pm on 8th
January that the smokescreen of the Paulson ‘death’ report built on top of the actual shootings, was manipulated by Cheney and his disinformation apparat for OBFUSCATION PURPOSES ..... and that:
• $44+ trillion was stolen and moved to Europe
behind this smokescreen (OR: an attempt to do this was perpetrated,
which was partially successful but which has since been frustrated). The primary recipient institution involved was BNP (Banque Nationale de Paris, Paribas).
This means that the eight Paribas bankers who were arrested, as we
reported earlier, had corrupt accomplices who remained in place, and
whose services were activated in connection with the illegal transfer
of stolen funds.... being reported here.
• The stolen funds represented $34
trillion held on C.H.I.P.S. belonging to Chinese parties (see earlier
Wantagate reports) plus other monies including Ambassador Wanta's $4.5
trillion, ..... a scandal that has triggered G-8 and Chinese
retaliation against Citibank, the accounts and assets of which are
reported (as of late on 8th January) to have been or to be at risk of
being frozen, against the background of Citibank being 'ORDERED' to pay
Wanta et al IMMEDIATELY. See below.
• Funds were being disbursed into bank
accounts to pay off domestic and foreign politicians and to set up more
criminal financial and other operations. In other words, corrupt
representatives of the payee ‘countries’ .......are helping themselves
• Channels in communication with the Principals and this service were arguably lied to ..... concerning all
dimensions of these matters, including the usual Greenspan-Bush ‘preparing to settle’ routine whereby prospective country and ‘Tier 1-6’ recipients, headed by Ambassador Wanta, were to be paid in accordance with a constantly amended ‘manana, manana’ timeframe: the standard Bush 41 technique that has been deployed for years.
• These manoeuvrings followed the usual,
unchanging model of financial deception developed by Dr Alan Greenspan
and Godfather Bush Sr., which we have called the ‘never-pay’ syndrome.
The way this works is simple in theory.
model requires every outstanding payment (of monies and funds leveraged
from them, owed to financial scam victims and past investors, and of
funds owed to ‘countries’ and of course all the funds owned by
Ambassador Lee Wanta as sole principal) to be linked and ‘dependent’ upon
other transactions and remittances. That way, sabotage perpetrated by
corrupt bankers and operatives at any level of the transactions
gridlock, destabilises the entire payments edifice, so that payments are repeatedly aborted. This procedure is repeated indefinitely.
It may be added that further ‘active investigations’ have been
triggered by these and related events, about which the Editor has not
CITIBANK ON VERGE OF BEING SHUT DOWN FOLLOWING THE LATEST GIGA-THEFTS.
Citibank in Hong Kong is virtually owned by the Chinese, who hold
approximately 90% of its so-called 'assets' (debt-backed assets).
Therefore the Chinese authorities would have no problem actually
causing the demise of Citibank, and were ( would be?)......more than
entitled to take whatever action they might deem appropriate in the
light of the outrageous and despicable last-minute $44+ trillion (in
the aggregate) theft that was perpetrated (or attempted) under cover of
.......the 'redirection' operation surrounding the Paulson shooting and 'death' farrago.
A ten-day deadline for the Wanta and related settlements imposed by the
G-8 powers expired last Monday ..........and failing settlement,
Citibank may cease to exist......... and US banks, being
non-compliant with Basel II, will be cut out of the world banking
That would quickly trigger a 50+% drop in the US standard of
living. However we believe that the massive pressure that has been
brought to bear (mainly by this service, in respect of the public
domain) may have 'done the trick' ......and that the Lee Wanta and
'linked' settlements will have been implemented just in the nick of
assessment is supported by the fact that we have now removed certain
devastating intelligence from the present report, which we had talked
over with Mr Cottrell. We have done this because just prior to this
report being posted, Mr Cottrell received a phone call asking him to
request that the Editor remove the relevant section 'because this
matter is being dealt with this morning'. This was accompanied by a
comment to the effect that 'you should be very happy later today'.
Since the parties conveying this request are 'part of the solution, not part of the problem', we have naturally complied: with the proviso that in the event of any further interference with the settlements TODAY,
devastating information that we have removed will be reinserted on the
basis that we don't need to comply with anything if we have been
CENSORED INTELLIGENCE: THE REFERENCED INFORMATION WAS REMOVED FROM HERE.
As indicated in the preceding section, the sensitive intelligence that
was to have been posted in THIS SPACE, has been removed at the request
of people 'who are part of the solution, not part of the problem'. THIS
HAS BEEN DONE ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT IF THIS EDITOR DOES NOT GATHER
THAT THE SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN EFFECTED TODAY, 9TH JANUARY 2008,
SENSITIVE INTELLIGENCE WHICH 'THEY' WANTED REMOVED, WILL BE REINSERTED
WITHOUT FURTHER ADO. We cannot be 'told what to do', but were are
'trying to be helpful'.
PHYSICAL STATUS OF PAULSON IS NOT A KEY TO UNDERSTANDING
Here, it needs perhaps to be added that it is neither here nor
there, from the perspective of the Settlements, whether Paulson is alive or dead now, is it?
he is alive, the ‘sting’ objective of the criminal ‘Black Ops’ apparat
was ‘achieved’ (so they may have briefly imagined: but no longer, we
If he is dead, Story was right, but he ‘rose from the dead’ in the format of a supposedly hired ‘double’ (the sophistication of which improved somewhat between 4th and 8th January, it seems),
the same fleeting objective in the perception of those who have little
knowledge of US criminal counterintelligence Psy-Ops and the willing
cooperation of the US ‘mainstream’ media under the terms of Operation
In other words, the Paulson matter is indeed, viewed ........in the
necessary broader perspective of the ongoing financial stealing and
corruption that has been taking place while the Paulson ‘feeding
frenzy’ has been going on, ..........DIVERSIONARY.
THE STEPS OF ANY ‘BLACK OPERATIONS’ MODEL
The essence of the attempted ‘Black Ops’ ‘sting’ against the Editor of
this service, if that was what happened, was applied...... in
accordance with the following model, Mr Cottrell informed the Editor at
5.00pm on 8th January:
• Step One: Redirect attention decisively away from what’s going on/is intended.
• Step Two:
OBFUSCATION: Create a massive diversion so that everyone rushes to look
at an irrelevance. And in this context, Michael C. Cottrell stresses to
the Editor that Paulson IS INDEED AN IRRELEVANCE.
He was shot at ...... and is being used to carry out the
obfuscation programme directed on behalf of Bush Sr. by Cheney, while
the criminal cadres (in the CIA and the relevant banks) perpetrated:
• Step Three: Colossal theft of the funds. As stated above, $44.0+ trillion was stolen behind the smokescreen provided by this contrived Paulson obfuscation operation.
At 4.50pm on 8th January, we were reliably advised that a very large
sum of money, thought to have been of the order of $19 trillion, had
been recovered, from the funds that were stolen ...behind the Paulson
WAS ‘PAULSON’ BEING BLACKMAILED TO COOPERATE?
It may reasonably be asked: if Paulson received a ‘pass-through’ bullet
(assuming he is still alive, for the purposes of this analysis), why on
earth would he subsequently cooperate with Bush and Cheney in this
ghoulish play-acting? Good question.
Recall that Paulson resorted to blackmailing the President of the
United States (even though Bush Jr. is the highest-ranking crook apart
from the Godfather).
As reported previously, Paulson’s failed blackmail attempt .... went
down like a lead balloon. If, as we are now required to believe,
Paulson recovered from his ‘pass-through’ shooting experience and has
been collaborating as a Dark Actor Playing Games in this charade, the
only possible rationale for such behaviour would be that he is himself
now being blackmailed by Bush/Cheney, and or threatened that if he
doesn’t cooperate, the next bullet will be fatal.
argumentation stretches the imagination somewhat, and might lead one to
suspect that Paulson may indeed be dead, after all, as certain forensic
investigators are continuing to tell us.
BUSH IN CHICAGO TO MEET WITH MAFIA BOSSES
On 7th January, while ‘Paulson’ was ‘speaking’ at the Westin Hotel, .....
43 was in Chicago possibly meeting with representatives of organised
crime there in connection with the colossal thefts that had taken place
as described above.
Meanwhile, in the background, Bush 41 proclaimed, as Mr Cottrell
reported to the Editor, that ‘he would never, ever pay Ambassador
– even as the hyper-corrupt President N. Sarkozy of France, of Hungarian Jewish background (note 2,bottom),
was supervising safe receipt of the funds stolen in recent days behind
the Paulson ‘Black Ops’ smokescreen. There is also a new corrupt
Jordanian connection about which the Editor has yet to be informed.
Also on 7th January, the ‘preparing to pay’ syndrome
yielded its usual outcome, when it was again revealed that Bush 43 had
interfered with the country and Tier 1-6 payments yet again, .....
the US State Department had confirmed (as had other payee sources that
are in touch with the Editor) that ‘everything was set to be completed’
on Tuesday 8th January.
Following the exposure of this deception, three officials at the State
Department were sacked, ......according to a usually reliable source
who spoke to the Editor after 1.00am British time in the early morning
of 8th January.
WHO IS DOING THE SHOOTING?
Before we revert to our deconstruction of the Paulson shooting and the
subsequent obfuscation operation, the question of ‘who is doing the
shooting’ needs to be addressed. It will be recalled that DOD Internal Affairs took over ‘enforcement’ and other grim activities
....... when it transpired that the Provost Marshal was not doing
his job. It has subsequently emerged that this General Rodney L.
Johnson, the Provost Marshal, an old Cheney associate, had been
compromised, having apparently been caught ‘in flagrante’ on tape.
Unconfirmed reports have since indicated that he was severely dealt
with, which is believed to mean that he was incarcerated.
The Provost Marshal appears to have fallen victim to bribery, but Nancy
Pelosi, who was once upon a time thought to have been in favour of the
Wanta Settlement and related payments, may have succumbed to something
According to a reliable source who provided the Editor with this information on 4th January, Pelosi may have been suborned by Mrs Hillary Rodomski Clinton, having been offered the Vice Presidency ticket on Mrs Hillary Rodomski’s now failing election campaign, in exchange for blocking the Settlement and related payments.
The shooting of a close aide of Mr Cheney, reported in our posting
dated 2nd January, has been separately described to us as having served
Cheney’s purposes remarkably well, too. Specifically, this shooting was
a kind of ‘sib’ operation (in which the perpetrator is made to look
like the victim) – a setup that implied at once that Cheney himself was
in danger of his life,..... whereas in actual fact he is the mastermind
behind the ‘Black Operations’ associated with these bank robberies,
which can collectively be described as the biggest bank hold-up in
Now it may still appear to some uninformed observers that the Editor
was the victim of a ‘sting’: but if that was so, it was true ONLY with
respect to the reported DEATH of Paulson (assuming that did not happen)
which in turn was based upon deliberate official lies fed to supposedly
honest and reliable people (see below).
COUNTERPRODUCTIVE TO ‘PIGGYBACK’ SUCH A ‘STING’ ATTEMPT
However since the (pass-through) shootings of Mr Paulson, Mr Kimmitt
and an unnamed senior US Treasury official did indeed take place,......
it follows that by ‘piggybacking’ the ‘sting’ onto the reality of the
shootings, the Bushes, Cheney et al have simply contrived to lengthen
the rope by means of which they are in the process of hanging
themselves. In other words, they have exacerbated their problems, not
the reverse. Because the shootings were true,
the ‘Black Operation’ to discredit the Editor of this service ..... has
drawn additional attention to them.
And also the Psy-Ops operatives have failed to discredit the Editor of
this service, which was their intention: indeed several sources ‘close
to the action’ have confirmed that the ‘Black’ lies fed to us .....were
intended exclusively for that purpose.
THE COUNTERVAILING FORCE INSIDE THE U.S. MILITARY
Who is doing the shooting? The answer to this obvious question is that a countervailing force has developed within the American military,
which has understood inter alia that the very actions of the military
itself ......are destroying America’s military strength, .......
an objective of malevolent foreign powers.
For instance, since the First Gulf War, some 500,070 veterans and other
personnel have fallen ill with so-called Gulf War Syndrome, caused not
(as some allege) by aspartame in Coca Cola (which turns into
formaldehyde in conditions of great heat), .........while some 15,000
of their number have died from cancer and other conditions triggered by exposure to depleted uranium.
The British Ministry of Defence is criminally covering up a similarly
deplorable state of affairs in respect of depleted uranium-related
illnesses among British military personnel.
The medium-term impact of this state of affairs will be to discourage young Americans from joining up,
since it will become known that, due to the use of depleted uranium in armour-busting shells,
signing up will mean dying early.
This may account for the reported fact that illegal Mexican immigrants
are being recruited into the American armed forces, in the context of
the unpopularity of Bush’s pointless and pitiless wars. Such recruits
would be ignorant of the dangers they will face from contact with
depleted uranium .
Anyway, due inter alia to such practical considerations, the
countervailing force inside the US military is hardening in its
attitude .......towards the confused shambles into which its corrupt
civilian leaderships have led the armed forces, and is therefore
sensitive to other parallel destabilising developments that threaten
the future of the Republic .........
– among which, we are now informed, is Wantagate and the unprecedented financial corruption that it has dislodged and exposed.
RESPONSE TO THE CRISIS BY THE MILITARY IS ‘INCREMENTAL’.
We also learned on 8th January 2008 from a newly acquired US source in
regular contact with the military, who has specifically been drawing
their attention to our reports for the past 11 months,..... that the
measures that are being taken internally by officers to address the
corruption crisis are of an ‘incremental nature’. This coincides with
information retailed by our own contacts speaking with US military
personnel regularly. This point should be borne in mind by all those
spectators who are understandably impatient for results.
When the time came for decisive action to be taken, following
Citibank’s uncouth behaviour in kicking Ambassador Wanta and his
diplomatic associates off the Citibank premises in midtown New York
under the supervision of two armed NYPD cops on 20th November 2007,
.......DOD Internal Affairs assumed the lead in lieu of the discredited Provost Marshal.
Shootings that have taken place to date have been undertaken against known traitors (who are also de facto war criminals) such as Paulson and Kimmitt,
by expert specialists who are literally able to inflict ‘pass-through’
shootings which wound and may even temporarily incapacitate the
targeted perpetrators but do not result in their deaths. It was such
precisely targeted shootings that took place on 28/29th December 2007
(assuming Paulson did not die later and although we reiterate that we
are not aware that Kimmitt has been seen since). Furthermore, at 8.05pm
on 4th January, the Editor was authoritatively informed that ‘new people are in control at the Treasury’, which would make sense if the top three had been ‘taken out’.
DE FACTO PREDICTED CIVIL WAR WITHIN THE U.S. STRUCTURES
We also know that, effectively, a civil war is raging inside the US
Federal structures as this horror story is being played out.
instance, the Special Forces operative seen (and reported upon) by
Washington DC firefighters (see the report dated 2nd January 2008) was
fleeing NOT (we are now informed by our military-connected sources)
from the fire itself, .....but from Cheney’s own US Secret Service agents.
was why the Special Forces operative, whose hand was lacerated when he
had to get through a window, refused hospital treatment.
This is the first ‘confirmed’ set-to between different formations
inside the US Federal structures that we have been able to report to
The theft of $44 trillion+ that was perpetrated under cover of the
Henry Paulson distraction, was preceded inter alia by the following
further known monetary thefts and interferences reported to the Editor
of this service by ‘connected’ contacts:
At 10.40pm, on 3rd January, it was reported to the Editor that Bush Jr.
and Cheney had ‘changed the banking codes’ for the Settlements again.
• $2.0 trillion previously stolen by Bush 41, was recovered on Friday 4th January.
• Several reports of massive attempted monetary thefts, which were thwarted.
SOURCES FOR PAULSON’S SHOOTING AND ‘DEATH’
definitive source for our published statement that Paulson was shot on
28th/29th December 2007 was Treasury Compliance. This fact was
reiterated to the Editor of this service in emphatic terms at 2.30pm on
8th January by Michael C. Cottrell, M.S., and is indisputable.
The source for our knowledge
that Robert M. Kimmitt, the Deputy US Treasury Secretary, and a third
senior Treasury official, were shot, also (but see below) on 28/29th
December 2007, was a knowledgeable ‘connected’ source in the
United States ..... with whom the Editor has been in contact for
months, who spoke to the Editor at 12.45 pm on Thursday 3rd January.
We cannot reveal the identity of this source, but the source is of
course identified in our retained note of the conversation. At the time
it was thought that the attack on Kimmitt, who speaks fluent German and
is/was a long-term Bush aide, may have occurred on 2nd January; but the
shooting is now believed to have occurred in the same timeframe as the
shooting of Paulson.
INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES ASK COTTRELL
IF THE OFFICIAL KILLED WAS KIMMITT
On 3rd January, US operatives telephoned Michael C. Cottrell, M.S.,
with the request that Mr Story should not publish anything further on
that date, following our report dated 2nd January, as the 2nd January
report ‘was getting in the way of efforts to complete the Settlement
information is exceptionally significant here. Why, if our report dated
2nd January, updated to report Paulson’s death, was impeding
settlement, is it nevertheless maintained that our report that Paulson
died was the product of as ‘sting’ to discredit the Editor of this
Presumably the CIA and Cheney are ‘on the same page’: or are they not?
In the same conversation with Mr Cottrell, the Agency operative who
called him, in Mr Cottrell’s own words, ‘asked me if it was Kimmitt who
was killed yesterday’, implying: (a) that our suspicion that Kimmitt
may have been killed could be true and (b) that the Kimmitt shooting or
assassination did actually take place on 2nd January, and not on
the CIA was deceiving Mr Cottrell, the record stands that on 3rd
January, a CIA operative asked Mr Cottrell whether the official who had
been killed on the preceding day was Kimmitt.
Given such FACTS, it seems to the Editor to be somewhat premature for everyone to assume that the ‘Paulson’ who surfaced, for instance, at the Westin Hotel on 7th January and on CNBC on the 8th, was actually Paulson himself and not a double, as forensics are telling us was the case.
STATE DEPARTMENT CONFIRMS THAT PAULSON DIED
At 4.50pm on Wednesday 2nd January 2006, this source informed the
Editor by telephone that ‘the State Department have confirmed that
Paulson died on 2nd January’. On 5th January, the same source informed
us as follows: ‘The State Department confirmed that Paulson is dead’.
At the time, we again thought that the death occurred, if it did occur,
on 2nd January.
However it was subsequently believed that Paulson may have died on 31st
December. On 7th January, the Editor demanded of the same source
(verbatim): ‘Did the State Department confirm Paulson’s death on 2nd
January, yes or no?’, to which the answer was an emphatic YES.
At 11.40pm UK time on 5th January, the Editor again spoke with this
‘connected’ source, and asked for the identities of two other
distinguished sources that had confirmed that Paulson had died. In this
conversation, the source indicated that it was now believed that
Paulson may have died on New Year’s Eve. Certainly, during the final
weekend of the year, the Editor became aware that it was thought that
Paulson might not make it into 2008.
The two distinguished sources for the information that Paulson had died were revealed to be:
• Former Federal Reserve Governor Oscar Meyer.
• An Ambassador (identity known to the Editor,
who has been asked to withhold his identity from this report).
We have telephone contact back-up for this information. As indicated
above, the Gold Badges who read our report on 2nd January 2008
did not dispute any fact contained therein.
OTHER SOURCES FOR THE SHOOTING DATA
Other sources for these events included the following:
1. An email dated 30th December 2007 and timed as having been received
by the Editor at 5:56pm. from a high-level US source who, again, has
been in contact with the Editor of this service from some months. He
cannot be identified but the email is of course in our files. In any
public airing of these events, the email message in question (as with
all our email traffic and underlying notes) will necessarily confirm
everything that is stated here with reference to our sources.
It contained the following statement:
‘Chris, I was told that Paulson took a bullet either late Friday or
early Saturday. That came from my US intel, with two confirmations.
Then today my [reference to a foreign power] intel also confirmed it
with an odd reply to the question, saying: “Well, sometimes people take
it in the chest’.
Initially, the Editor thought that the phrase ‘took a bullet’ (not used
in England), may have been a figure of speech, and asked for
clarification. He asked whether it was a figure of speech or that that
the phrase should be interpreted literally, applicable also to the
foreign intelligence source’s elaboration. The answer was that it
should be taken literally.
INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION OF PAULSON DEATH REPORT
At 17.59 UK time on 2nd January 2008, following the publication of our
report that Paulson had been shot (updated to incorporate the report
that he died), the Editor received an email message from a separate
‘connected’ correspondent, under the heading: ‘Henry M. Paulson,
Secretary of the US Treasury, died today from his gunshot wounds’:
‘This is true. I have it confirmed from a source of mine. Thanks again
Christopher for all you do and your amazing courage to carry through
On 3rd January 2008, the website www.fourwinds10.com carried a ‘Casper Update’ which contained the following passage:
BUSH was confronted today with the death of PAULSON.
“That’s a lie” says he.
“Well, produce him”, says he.
“I can’t, says he, “he’s sick”.
“Yes, dead men are usually sick before they die”, says we.
“Can you produce the FIVE CHENEY ASSISTANTS who have been shot?!
Before we complete this passage from www.fourwinds10.com, consider the following:
• If our report that Paulson had died is a
‘lie’, WHY DID THE TREASURY OR THE U.S. GOVERNMENT NOT ISSUE A
CATEGORICAL DENIAL OF IT, given that such a report might be considered
a problem for the financial markets? The President’s verbal statement
that it was a ‘lie’ should have been followed up by a categorical
official denial of the report.
Or was it simply that, since the report appeared in a despised
‘alternative media’ source, it could not be expected to affect the
financial markets at all?
• Why did White House spokesman Tony Fratto have nothing to say about the report?
• But of course acknowledging that it was
a ‘lie’ was out of the question, wasn’t it, because the report was
based upon a confirmation from the US State Department (backed, we can
reveal, by statements by an Ambassador and a former distinguished
Governor of the Federal Reserve) that Paulson had died. So the President was not only contradicting the State Department, but was also saying that the State Department had lied! Did he warn Condoleeza Rice that he would contradict the State Department’s confirmation? Apparently not.
• Note that Bush 43 stated that he could
not ‘produce’ Paulson, because ‘he is sick’. On the basis that the
shooting was ‘pass-through’, Henry Paulson would have been ‘sick’
because he was still recovering from the shooting, which was not fatal.
That would account for the appearance of an almost motionless Paulson
‘cadaver’ at the staged appearance that took place in the White House
on 4th January (even though the Treasury’s website had explicitly
stated that no appearances by Treasury officials had been scheduled for
between 22nd December and 4th January). Alternatively, he was ‘sick’
because he was dead, and his subsequent choreographed appearances have
indeed been performances by a hired doppleganger.
• Observe that ‘Casper’ referenced FIVE Cheney aides who had been shot (whereas we only knew of ONE).
Since the President did NOT dispute the information contained in the
question (namely that FIVE Cheney aides had been shot), we believe that
this information has to be correct. Instead of disputing that FIVE
Cheney aides had been shot, the Criminal President simply said that he
could not produce them. Obviously not, because they had been shot.
The ‘Casper’ passage concluded:
The three administration people arrested per STORY Update were taken to The Hague.
BUSH mumbled something about an instant recession “IF”.
Allow us to elaborate here:
• The first statement provides
confirmation that the three who were arrested as we stated in our
report dated 2nd January were Administration officials (as we thought),
not bankers. These officials were transferred to the jurisdiction of
the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Like the two Americans
held by the Israelis pending payment of the funds that Paulson
double-crossed them over (see the same report), these three US officials can be considered hostages pending the necessary settlements. Very interesting.
• The Criminal President’s mumble about an ‘instant recession “IF”'
was clearly a reference to his perverse stance that “IF” Basel II is
implemented and applied in the United States, the corrupt banks’
on-the-books finances ‘will be’ severely constrained, tipping the
country into recession at once (which is happening anyway).
Being interpreted, what he was trying to say but didn’t,...... was that
his repeated interferences with the settlements represented an
operation to frustrate and jeopardise or destroy Basel II, so that
corrupt ‘business as usual’, could continue as though nothing had
By extension, the desperate giga-thefts that took place under cover of
the ‘Paulson obfuscation’ .......represented a frantic response by
these cornered financial criminals to grab back as much of the stolen
loot as they can, just in case they fail to frustrate the
implementation of the new Basel II on-the-books banking regime,
precluding corrupt ‘business as usual’.
At 5.20pm on Saturday 5th January, an authoritative source in the
Southwest of the United States was reported to the Editor to have
stated, with reference to Paulson: ‘He’s gone’. He added that ‘no-one
is not accessible’.
This email, too, is resident, of course, in our files.
MILITARY CONTACTS OF INDEPENDENT SOURCE CONFIRM THE DEATH
On 4th January 2008, Patrick J Bellringer posted the following comments
in response to this message (typical of many that we also received in
similar vein) on the www.fourwinds10.com website: ‘I saw Paulson on CNBC at 2pm EST sitting next to Bush. This should put an an end to this Paulson death nonsense’.
Like so many others, this ‘helpful’ correspondent revealed his naivety
and failure to understand that an image on a TV screen nowadays can
lie, and may even have no meaning. The information on the screen may be
entirely ‘virtual’, which these critics appear for some weird reason
not to understand.
Bellringer responded inter alia as follows:
‘I have been slammed with email from doubters like you about the US
Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson’s death being a hoax, and that
I am a liar from claiming that Henry is now dead because you saw him on
TV sitting with President G W Bush and VP Cheney. I ask: What did you
see? Did Henry move? Did he speak? Did you see his eyes move? Were you
looking at a video made by the CIA in their Hollywood studio? Were you
looking at a lookalike (double), a holographic image or even a solid
‘Is Henry Paulson dead? My military sources, some of whom participated
in the incident in which Paulson was killed, say this is true. I have
been informed that the Henry Paulson family are now making funeral
arrangements. Why is this so, if he were alive?’
‘You must choose whom you are willing to believe. As Christopher Story
has said: “You cannot have it both ways. Make up your mind which
sources you trust, but don’t, please, burden us with your unbelief”’.
In a ‘Casper’ Update posted on www.fourwinds10.com on 4th January, the reporter commented:
‘We have at least as many sources as STORY claiming he is deceased and
today’s video a fraud. One source says the family acknowledged his
passing the day it happened, US military sources, banking sources, even
WIKIPEDIA, said it’s true. The WIKIPEDIA obit, right below his picture,
was removed within hours of posting. Another source said the family was
making funeral arrangements. Others speak of a “stand-in”. Fox News and
all present at the meeting of economic advisers would have to be in on
SOME CLOSING FORENSIC OBSERVATIONS
Separately, on 3rd January, a correspondent drew our attention to the fact that the Wikipedia entry for Henry M. Paulson
suddenly contained the phrase ‘Died: 2 January 2008’ beneath the Library photograph of this criminal operative.
the text in that segment of a Wikipedia page is always blue. The date
of death was shown in black. When the Editor checked the site
(immediately after receiving the correspondent’s email), the date of
death was missing.
The correspondent later confirmed that he had verified that the date of
death had been there, but that it had been removed within hours of
Forensic examinations of all the relevant tapes are in progress, and copies of all the ‘post-mortem appearances’ of Paulson have been acquired. This subject is getting too complicated to elaborate here, but a number of odd findings are worth adding
• Newsday.com, which had carried a report
of the hastily convened meeting at the White House ostensibly between
Bush Jr., ‘Paulson;, Bernanke and Leazar (Chairman, Council of Economic
Advisers), had removed this report by 6th January, so that the listing
jumped from articles published on 3rd January, to 5th January, with
nothing listed for 4th January at all.
• A supposed photograph of the meeting,
shown on the Treasury website, has Bush Jr., ‘Paulson, Bernanke and
Lazear in that order with Mr Lazear furthest from the camera, the only
problem being that a portion of Bernanke’s head, which is further from
the camera than ‘Paulson’s’, intrudes over Paulson’s head.
• A Treasury Department photograph monitored on 8th January supposedly of the staged event on 4th January, had been changed.
‘Paulson’ was standing to one side.
An expert points out that this picture was suspiciously ‘identical’ to
a known photograph of Paulson speaking at Georgetown Law School.
• Official pictures about the meeting on
4th January included one shot of President Bush and ‘Paulson’, with
Cheney, who was not mentioned anywhere as participating at the meeting.
Some reports on ‘Paulson’s supposed video appearance at the staged
event on 4th January suggested that the person in question was under
• If the Paulson video appearance at the
staged meeting on 4th January was bogus, certain preliminary forensic
findings support such a conclusion.
For instance, in video insertion and manipulation of Paulson headshot
and hands took place, this would explain bizarre movements and
expressions, with ‘Paulson’s’ shirt collar remaining still most of the
time despite the head movement.
The basic software being used for such fakery
is the same, presumably, as that used in the fraudulent videos still
concocted by the CIA purporting to be the updated ruminations of Osama
Bin Laden, who actually died in Minnesota on 26th December 2001.
• FACT: The late John Chambers, who died
in 2001, was the key makeup-to-go expert for the CIA. The current
leading experts in making up doubles are believed to be Hollywood’s
Rick Baker and Robert Sidell, a former colleague of Chambers.
Forensic examinations of video footage of the ‘post-mortem appearances’
are reliably reported to contain curious anomalies. Explanations of
these will have to wait until later, or they appear in the Editor’s
Wantagate book, in preparation.
THE ACTUAL SHOOTINGS HAVE NOT BEEN COVERED UP
The main point to take away from this report is that PART of the
Paulson matter MAY have been an attempted ‘Black Ops’ discrediting
operation. It impressed a small proportion of gullible people,
augmented by paid Cheney Psy-Ops hacks who have bombarded the Editor
with abusive emails as a consequence. After a few were examined, these
were all trashed unread.
But the shootings were real (as the ‘death may still turn out to be’:
it may be too early to be sure) and have NOT BEEN COVERED UP.
Therefore, to attempt a ‘sting’ operation against the Editor of this
service on the back of the shootings, was an act of desperation by the
Dark Forces who have been exposed by Wantagate through this website.
The ‘sting’ was also a diversion, to redirect attention away from what
was happening – giga-theft on a gargantuan scale, a.k.a. corrupt
‘business as usual’. As should soon become clear, this massive criminal
and diversionary 'Psy-Ops' operation has crumbled.
TOUCH AND GO AGAIN: WILL THE CATASTROPHE BE
While vast amounts of the stolen funds were quickly recovered – the four PROMIS teams monitoring these illicit financial thefts and movements 24/7 have had no rest
– the issue that matters is whether the tiny cabal of World Class
criminals will finally be stopped, by means which this Editor has no
right to speculate about, or whether the financial and economic crash
that we predicted on 2nd September 2006 and again in the summer of 2007
– will be allowed, thanks to the satanic intransigence of these
ruthless madmen, simply to occur because the relevant powers inside the
US structures fail to take whatever action they might consider
appropriate in the circumstances.
As this report was being closed, we were being told that Citigroup has had all its assets, as well as its gold, frozen.
This information was provided to the Editor by email at 2:12pm on 8th
January. It could not be confirmed at this closing: but the very
surfacing of such a report indicates ‘where we’re at’ – which the
redirected Paulson diversion does not.
INCREMENTAL MILITARY PROGRESS (COULD BE TOO SLOW)
One final point. As indicated above, the belated response of the
‘counterforce’ within the US military plus the relevant elements of the
Military Power, are operating ‘incrementally’. We have this information
from TWO separate military sources. Therefore, events such as those
that have taken place in recent weeks, and others that we don’t yet
know much about, are, by definition, having incremental consequences.
If you haven’t yet understood what is going on as these forces come to the rescue of the Republic at the last moment, bear that important fact in mind. And it’s not
one minute to midnight. It’s five o’clock in the morning, in case those who have been fast asleep hadn’t noticed.
(1) The source's email dated 6th January 2008 and
timed at 05:47 am UK time, stated: 'I called the Department of the
Treasury and they acted very strange. The man I spoke to refused to
identify himself and would only answer questions with questions
ridiculing my willingness to believe alternative news sources. He was
totaly insolent and rude and hung up on me'.
(2) An experienced businessman and traveller known to the Editor of this service, who has had extensive business in Hungary, informs us that Hungarian crooks are among the most ruthless and dangerous category of mobsters in the world.